Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Air Line Carry-On baggage Size
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 1, 2019 10:23:01   #
khumiston
 
I checked dimensions and found both the hard-sided case and the soft backpack for my EF 600 1:4 IS II USM exceed airline carry-on luggage dimensions, although I am fairly sure that physically the soft backpack will fit in the overhead compartment as it is 9"X10", but the length of the backpack is 25", whereas the airline spec is 9"X14"X22". so the longest dimension exceeds the airline spec by 3 ". The hard case for the 600 is just over on two of the three dimensions. I am trying to find the dimensions for the hard case and backpack for the EF 500 mm lens to see if it meets the airline spec. If anyoneout there in Hog Land has an EF 500 mm lens and either hard case or soft case (backpack) who could tell me what the dimensions of those cases are I would sincerely appreciate it. I am tempted to try carrying the backpack on, if required to check it I would not want to check the soft backpack. If I knew I would have to check it I'd much prefer checking it in the hard sided case. Much thanks to anyone who has flown with either/or the EF 500 or EF 600 and can tell me what their experience was.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 10:35:38   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
Slightly tangential to your question, but I find it easier to fudge the size limits if you are in some sort of an upgraded seat. It is also worthwhile to try and get early boarding, but I am sure you are aware of this.

These are the reasons, in my retired years I prefer to drive anywhere I go in the Lower 48 & Canada.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 10:46:44   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
It might have to go in long side left-to-right.
The overheads are deeper on the 3-seat isle than the 2-seat isle.
Too many people don't realize that the overheads were designed for the bags to be placed long side front-to-back. (More can be stowed that way.) The size of the compartments dictates the acceptable baggage size. They probably use the smaller of the compartments as standard.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2019 10:51:54   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
khumiston wrote:
I checked dimensions and found both the hard-sided case and the soft backpack for my EF 600 1:4 IS II USM exceed airline carry-on luggage dimensions, although I am fairly sure that physically the soft backpack will fit in the overhead compartment as it is 9"X10", but the length of the backpack is 25", whereas the airline spec is 9"X14"X22". so the longest dimension exceeds the airline spec by 3 ". The hard case for the 600 is just over on two of the three dimensions. I am trying to find the dimensions for the hard case and backpack for the EF 500 mm lens to see if it meets the airline spec. If anyoneout there in Hog Land has an EF 500 mm lens and either hard case or soft case (backpack) who could tell me what the dimensions of those cases are I would sincerely appreciate it. I am tempted to try carrying the backpack on, if required to check it I would not want to check the soft backpack. If I knew I would have to check it I'd much prefer checking it in the hard sided case. Much thanks to anyone who has flown with either/or the EF 500 or EF 600 and can tell me what their experience was.
I checked dimensions and found both the hard-sided... (show quote)


I use a 20" Tamrac Corona 20 Convertible. Not as my "carry on" but as my personal item. I also have a carry on bag for my clothing. The 20" fits under my seat. However, since I get early boarding, I also put it in the overhead.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 11:13:26   #
Haydon
 
I've been using a Gura Gear 22+ for years and it's meets US traveling and adequately accommodates my EF 500F4. Unfortunately, it's no longer in production but it can be found on eBay. It's one of the finest bags out there.

Here's a used bag for $100 on eBay.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Gura-Gear-Kiboko-22L/283532786262?hash=item4203defa56:g:kAEAAOSwV7Nc~Tz8

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 07:51:07   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
I've read that some photographers avoid this kind of problem by renting their gear at their destination. They arrange things in advance.

Meanwhile, DO NOT check your 600mm lens with the airlines. The crime of theft still exists in baggage handling. And the possibility of damage to your lens arises due to rough handling.

You can discipline yourself as well by traveling light.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 08:02:09   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
I have a side bag that works as a personal carry-on in addition to my carry-on suitcase.

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2019 08:13:31   #
wireloose
 
There is always the option to Fedex to your destination, and back, if you are staying in country thats normally not expensive.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 09:52:53   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
I don’t fly a lot but rest assured on every flight, there are at least a handful of people who exceed/abuse the airline carryon size limitations. Airlines realize that and the last few flights (including one last week), the airline requested people check bags at the gate because of limited overhead space. When they didn’t get enough (?), they snagged a couple in the jetway. My sympathy is severely limited for people who don’t play by the rules. Get a conforming bag and you won’t have anything to worry about.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 10:09:56   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Note: When boarding, if you are asked about your bag, explain that the bag contains camera gear with batteries. Batteries seems to be the magic password that gets things on-board.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 10:36:59   #
n4jee Loc: New Bern, NC
 
I have this one on eBay for $30: https://www.ebay.com/itm/192968156181
It was designed for airline travel and was the standard for traveling photographers for years

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2019 11:13:46   #
zcarxrg Loc: Corpus Christi
 
khumiston wrote:
I checked dimensions and found both the hard-sided case and the soft backpack for my EF 600 1:4 IS II USM exceed airline carry-on luggage dimensions, although I am fairly sure that physically the soft backpack will fit in the overhead compartment as it is 9"X10", but the length of the backpack is 25", whereas the airline spec is 9"X14"X22". so the longest dimension exceeds the airline spec by 3 ". The hard case for the 600 is just over on two of the three dimensions. I am trying to find the dimensions for the hard case and backpack for the EF 500 mm lens to see if it meets the airline spec. If anyoneout there in Hog Land has an EF 500 mm lens and either hard case or soft case (backpack) who could tell me what the dimensions of those cases are I would sincerely appreciate it. I am tempted to try carrying the backpack on, if required to check it I would not want to check the soft backpack. If I knew I would have to check it I'd much prefer checking it in the hard sided case. Much thanks to anyone who has flown with either/or the EF 500 or EF 600 and can tell me what their experience was.
I checked dimensions and found both the hard-sided... (show quote)


I use my Sigma 500mm f/4 DG OS HSM Sports Lens canvas backpack for my Canon 600 mm IS II when I am traveling by car. Exterior dimensions 21.5 x 11 x 11 inches. The foam padding at the lens mount end of the backpack is 3 pieces of 8.75 " square foam glued together which are each approximately 1 1/4" thick. I was able to pull one of the 1 1/4 foam pieces off the assembly so the 600 mm lens (WITHOUT LENS HOOD) fits perfectly in the case. The two piece foam part remaining has a circular cutout for the lens mount/cap and 1 1/4 inches of foam pad remaining between the lens mount and case exterior. The other end of the case (bottom as photographed) has about 3/4" of foam padding between the lens and the exterior of the case. I use an Aquatech rubber lens cover when transporting the lens in the backpack. The side of the case is zipperd along 80 percent of its height to allow easy lens insertion in to the case. The backpack also has mid lens support pieces which keep the lens (with arca swiss mount attached) centered during transport. The backpack also has a small zippered pouch at the top. The backpack has a carry strap at the top and adjustable shoulder straps. I have not tried flying with this setup. I am expecting the backpack can be purchased from Sigma. Image is from The-Digital-Picture.com . You might also research the new canvas backpack provided with the Canon 600mm IS III but that lens is marginally shorter and shaped a little differently than the IS II so it may or may not work.



Reply
Jul 2, 2019 11:16:29   #
zcarxrg Loc: Corpus Christi
 
Sorry ,,, the length dimension is actually 22.5 inches as described for my use.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 12:47:06   #
TheShoe Loc: Lacey, WA
 
One word of caution - the size allowances may be different, as defined by the individual airlines, so you need to check the rules for the specific carriers that you are going to use.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 16:11:09   #
Properframe Loc: US Virginia
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Note: When boarding, if you are asked about your bag, explain that the bag contains camera gear with batteries. Batteries seems to be the magic password that gets things on-board.


Lithium batteries specifically. By law they cannot be checked - thus your carryon MUST stay with you as a carry on. They will choose some other passenger to check his bag.

I place all my lenses and gear in two items. A Pelican that meets the carryon specs (can fit up to a Nikon 600mmFLED) and a Manfrotto back pack that meets the personal item specs. I can easily carry a lot of gear this way. I do end up checking the tripod and gimbal. But the other "real money" gear is with me at all times.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.