Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Sorry If You’re Offended, but Socialism Leads to Misery and Destitution
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 28, 2019 15:22:17   #
EyeSawYou
 
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/07/27/sorry-if-youre-offended-but-socialism-leads-to-misery-and-destitution/

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 16:03:14   #
lenben Loc: Seattle
 
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 18:00:43   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


These guys won’t get past your first sentence. They have no advocacy towards anything leaning left.
Thanks for the distinction.

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2019 18:32:50   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


taxing a business to death is just one more form of taking them over!!!!!!!

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 19:42:39   #
EyeSawYou
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
These guys won’t get past your first sentence. They have no advocacy towards anything leaning left.
Thanks for the distinction.


You didn’t even read the “article” did you?

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 19:44:52   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
EyeSawYou wrote:
You didn’t even read the “article” did you?


Not this time.

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 19:53:43   #
EyeSawYou
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


The distinction was clearly made in the article if you have read it.

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2019 09:45:34   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


I usually stay away from these discussions but I wonder how Democratic Socialist governments in Europe would look today had we not been shouldering a large part of the cost of defending Western Europe since the end of WW II.

Reply
Jun 29, 2019 10:21:53   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
BobHartung wrote:
I usually stay away from these discussions but I wonder how Democratic Socialist governments in Europe would look today had we not been shouldering a large part of the cost of defending Western Europe since the end of WW II.


This would be their song:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U06jlgpMtQs

Reply
Jun 29, 2019 11:11:19   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


Good distinction. They take from businesses and give to ens***ed underachievers and deadbeats.
Good for them.
Socialism is still a dirty filthy word...

Reply
Jun 29, 2019 13:05:07   #
One Rude Dawg Loc: Athol, ID
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


Socialism, c*******m, one and the same. They have done so well since the revolution in Russia back in the day. Great modern examples, Cuba a thriving bustling economy, North Korea, Venezuela, just to name a few. These snot nose punk millenials etc. don't have a clue what they are flirting with.

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2019 13:36:08   #
Angmo
 
One Rude Dawg wrote:
Socialism, c*******m, one and the same. They have done so well since the revolution in Russia back in the day. Great modern examples, Cuba a thriving bustling economy, North Korea, Venezuela, just to name a few. These snot nose punk millenials etc. don't have a clue what they are flirting with.



Reply
Jun 29, 2019 15:05:17   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
lenben wrote:
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism. It is a system in which private enterprise is taken over by governments. The governments of many countries in Europe are incorrectly described as socialist but they are in fact 'democratic socialistic' in which many benefits accrue to the population but businesses are not incorporated in the government and function the same as businesses in the US. These countries seem quite successful using this type of governance. Most office holders and candidates described as socialists in fact have no advocacy towards taking over business interests. Please honor this distinction.
Let us be clear about the definition of socialism.... (show quote)


Does taking over 20% of the entire American economy count?

Reply
Jun 29, 2019 15:06:48   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
LWW wrote:


Not easy to dance to, I give it a one.

Reply
Jun 29, 2019 17:25:15   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
These guys won’t get past your first sentence. They have no advocacy towards anything leaning left.
Thanks for the distinction.


Medicare for all sure sounds like a take over of an industry, so does free college education for all.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.