Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why go Mirrorless when I have a Canon 5d mK IV?
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
Jun 25, 2019 20:21:23   #
DavidPhares Loc: Chandler, Arizona
 
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move up” to the new full frame mirrorless camera.

I have been advised by several of those in the know that the sensor on the new mirrorless is no better than the Mk IV. Keep in mind I have four (4) Canon EF “L” lenses to support the Mk IV.

I shoot mostly portraits in my personal studio, which is equipped with a full set of ceiling mounted pull-down lights, and free standing lights.

Why should I “move up” given the significant expense?

I am open to opinions on both sides. 😄

David

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 20:27:58   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
No reason to make a change based on what you told us.

--

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 20:31:17   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
It is not a move up. It is a move to different capabilities.

Mirrorless offers some unique features like being able to see what your going to get before you get it. Try long exposures with a 10 stop ND filter. Mirrorless can be silent. It can also be more compact.

But, if you love your Mk IV, you don't need a mistress.

Reply
 
 
Jun 25, 2019 20:36:47   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
David, you - and only you - can decide what sort of cameras will best fit your professional needs. If you were a photographic amateur, an experienced photo enthusiast, or - like myself - an elderly enthusiast now hobbled by arthritis, heart congestion and cancer, the best recommendation would be different in each case. Enjoy your fine Canon 5D iv, the Mammas And The Papas were spot on.

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 20:45:53   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
DavidPhares wrote:
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move up” to the new full frame mirrorless camera.

I have been advised by several of those in the know that the sensor on the new mirrorless is no better than the Mk IV. Keep in mind I have four (4) Canon EF “L” lenses to support the Mk IV.

I shoot mostly portraits in my personal studio, which is equipped with a full set of ceiling mounted pull-down lights, and free standing lights.

Why should I “move up” given the significant expense?

I am open to opinions on both sides. 😄

David
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move... (show quote)


No sound or vibration from the flopping mirror. See difficult lighting/exposure results in the EVF ( unless using flash)
.

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 21:30:23   #
carl hervol Loc: jacksonville florida
 
It sound like your friends are trying to spend your money save it use it on glass.

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 21:36:25   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
imagemeister wrote:
No sound or vibration from the flopping mirror. See difficult lighting/exposure results in the EVF ( unless using flash)
.


I routinely use live view or mirror lock up on my 5D.

Mike

Reply
 
 
Jun 25, 2019 21:41:15   #
Vietnam Vet
 
bsprague wrote:
It is not a move up. It is a move to different capabilities.

Mirrorless offers some unique features like being able to see what your going to get before you get it. Try long exposures with a 10 stop ND filter. Mirrorless can be silent. It can also be more compact.

But, if you love your Mk IV, you don't need a mistress.


When I look in my viewfinder I see what I am going to get before I take a picture. So what is all the hype about going mirrorless so that you can see what you are going to get before you take the picture?

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 22:05:28   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
"I" definitely would not!
I'd stay with the 5D IV.

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 22:19:37   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
I have the same body and a bunch of EF “L” lenses and see no compelling reason to move. My camera is very familiar, having owned a 7D and a 5D3, and does everything I want (it’s a better camera than I am a photographer), so not a limiting factor. The only reason I would move is for silent shooting in weddings if I were a pro, which I’m not. If I were buying new, maybe, but since, like you, I’m invested, no desire to “have the latest thing” with minimal advantage.

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 22:34:29   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
imagemeister wrote:
No sound or vibration from the flopping mirror. See difficult lighting/exposure results in the EVF ( unless using flash)
.


Smaller, lighter, cheaper, sharper wide angle lenses - IF - you use them.....
.

Reply
 
 
Jun 25, 2019 22:35:05   #
bleirer
 
I think you have an amazing camera and I don't think you will get better images with an R for example. When the 5d is long in tooth the 'pro R' will be on the shelves. https://www.canonrumors.com/a-couple-of-eos-r-cameras-that-can-be-considered-pro-are-in-the-pipeline-cr1/

Reply
Jun 25, 2019 22:52:59   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
DavidPhares wrote:
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move up” to the new full frame mirrorless camera.

I have been advised by several of those in the know that the sensor on the new mirrorless is no better than the Mk IV. Keep in mind I have four (4) Canon EF “L” lenses to support the Mk IV.

I shoot mostly portraits in my personal studio, which is equipped with a full set of ceiling mounted pull-down lights, and free standing lights.

Why should I “move up” given the significant expense?

I am open to opinions on both sides. 😄

David
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move... (show quote)


No reason to change if you like what you have. Anyway, the 5D probably looks much more impressive to your portrait subjects than a camera that is half the size and it makes those cool clicking and mirror slapping sounds.

Reply
Jun 26, 2019 02:33:30   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
DavidPhares wrote:
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move up” to the new full frame mirrorless camera.

I have been advised by several of those in the know that the sensor on the new mirrorless is no better than the Mk IV. Keep in mind I have four (4) Canon EF “L” lenses to support the Mk IV.

I shoot mostly portraits in my personal studio, which is equipped with a full set of ceiling mounted pull-down lights, and free standing lights.

Why should I “move up” given the significant expense?

I am open to opinions on both sides. 😄

David
A good friend of mine has been bugging me to “move... (show quote)


My 2 cents:

You should only "move up" because you want the mirrorless advantages. If you do not see any advantages don't waste money.

You should only do things because YOU want to. Not because someone says you should.

Reply
Jun 26, 2019 05:32:37   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
The EOS R comes with an EF to RF lens adapter so your EF L series lenses will work. The EOS R has a superior AF system, a touch tilt screen and a digic 8 processor. The EOS R is smaller and lighter and its EVF is way better than the OVF in the mk IV.
These are some reasons to get an EOS R, is you have two grand to spare.
I have a 5D mk IV and a whole bunch of L series lenses and although there are plenty of great features on the EOS R, it's bleeding edge technology and since it won't really take exceptionally better images than the camera it shares an image sensor with, I don't plan on acquiring a new body until at least the EOS R mk II is available. Now if you need a new body, the EOS R is less expensive than the 5D mk IV.

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.