RAW and JPEG question
Jun 12, 2019 10:56:43 #
Picture Taker
Loc: Michigan Thumb
What is your point? Do what? Take pictures and just print a sell? (I'v done that but not usually)
Jun 12, 2019 11:03:18 #
Post processing a digital image brings out its potential, justifying the involved effort.
Streets wrote:
Post processing jpegs is a pain in the ass. The one good thing about film was that post processing was not an option for all but the pros. Processing raw images is an even bigger pain in the ass as well as a greater time waster. If I'm the only one on the planet that feels this way, so be it.
Jun 12, 2019 11:12:52 #
sueyeisert
Loc: New Jersey
Do you like sitting and post processing?
I have a Fuji camera and most of the time shoot jpeg. With my infrared camera I shoot raw.
I have a Fuji camera and most of the time shoot jpeg. With my infrared camera I shoot raw.
Jun 12, 2019 11:14:51 #
Speed, practicality for simple adjustment in PhotoShop, smaller files for emailing - printing up to 8"x10" suggests JPEG.
For special attention, large printing and increased sharpnes, RAW would be my choice.
I shoot both.
For special attention, large printing and increased sharpnes, RAW would be my choice.
I shoot both.
Jun 12, 2019 11:18:47 #
Streets wrote:
Post processing jpegs is a pain in the ass. The one good thing about film was that post processing was not an option for all but the pros. Processing raw images is an even bigger pain in the ass as well as a greater time waster. If I'm the only one on the planet that feels this way, so be it.
Only pros post processed film? You are wrong. There were, and still are some amateurs who processed and printed their own film in a darkroom. It is an important part of getting the best out of film photography, if you didn't want to use an expensive custom lab.
Jun 12, 2019 11:40:15 #
Paul J. Svetlik wrote:
Speed, practicality for simple adjustment in PhotoShop, smaller files for emailing - printing up to 8"x10" suggests JPEG.
For special attention, large printing and increased sharpnes, RAW would be my choice.
I shoot both.
For special attention, large printing and increased sharpnes, RAW would be my choice.
I shoot both.
Post processing a jpeg to an 8x10? Here's a jpeg that would make a nice 40x60. It was P.P.d using the free version of Fotor. Would a raw image have looked better? Use double download.
Jun 12, 2019 11:43:40 #
davyboy
Loc: Anoka Mn.
kmpankopf wrote:
That is so true. I have never heard anyone say I wish I had shot that in JPG.
Still lovin’ my jpegs!
Jun 12, 2019 11:45:17 #
Jun 12, 2019 11:45:48 #
What can be accomplished in raw is truly amazing. Almost 90% of anything you would want to do can be done and raw. By pressing k you can get into advanced RAW tools seldom necessary but they come in handy sometimes when you’re desperate
Jun 12, 2019 11:47:48 #
photoman022
Loc: Manchester CT USA
RAW gives you more latitude in the changes you would like to make.
If you shoot in JPEG and edit that photo be sure to use the "Save As" feature in your File menu. Change the name of the file. I usually just add an "A" to it. By using "Save As" you do not change the original JPEG file.
If you shoot in JPEG and edit that photo be sure to use the "Save As" feature in your File menu. Change the name of the file. I usually just add an "A" to it. By using "Save As" you do not change the original JPEG file.
Jun 12, 2019 11:48:44 #
davyboy
Loc: Anoka Mn.
JohnSwanda wrote:
Try asking them for some better quality ground beef.
Their beef is just fine!
Jun 12, 2019 11:51:04 #
davyboy
Loc: Anoka Mn.
imagemeister wrote:
- and less expense and less resources ! Yes, you can PP JPEGS to your heart's content - just like I do .....
.
- and less expense and less resources ! Yes, you can PP JPEGS to your heart's content - just like I do ......
Amen brother!
Jun 12, 2019 11:59:20 #
davyboy
Loc: Anoka Mn.
JohnSwanda wrote:
Neither is as good as a hamburger you cook yourself at home.
Why? I’m lovin’ it🤠
Jun 12, 2019 12:01:15 #
davyboy
Loc: Anoka Mn.
billnikon wrote:
I shoot nothing but JPEG. And I post process with photoshop and lightroom. I create 16X24 show prints. My prints sell well. I have no issues. My exposures are usually spot on so changes in exposure in photoshop is a non issue. As far as color balance, I shoot outside with the sun behind me. Again, no issues with color balance.
Now some folks love RAW, shoot nothing but RAW. And the RAW folks love there results. And, so do I in using JPEG.
Now some folks love RAW, shoot nothing but RAW. And the RAW folks love there results. And, so do I in using JPEG.
Did I tell you that I love ya 😉
Jun 12, 2019 12:05:48 #
davyboy wrote:
Why? I’m lovin’ it🤠
Well, the fast food places depend on people with low standards.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.