Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Exclusive Interview with "CBS This Morning," Attorney General William Barr....
May 31, 2019 11:01:39   #
WNYShooter Loc: WNY
 
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/william-barr-interview-full-transcript-cbs-this-morning-jan-crawford-exclusive-2019-05-31/

Reply
May 31, 2019 11:21:24   #
trainspotter Loc: Oregon
 
I got sleepy reading this....(need more coffee)

Reply
May 31, 2019 14:20:48   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
I have a Barr question. If Barr was not satisfied with the report and felt that Meuller should make a determination as to whether or not a crime was committed, and considering that Barr was and still is Meuller's boss at the time of the release. Why didn't Barr send the report back to Meuller with that instruction prior to releasing it?

Reply
 
 
May 31, 2019 16:40:36   #
McKinneyMike Loc: Texas
 
Frank T wrote:
I have a Barr question. If Barr was not satisfied with the report and felt that Meuller should make a determination as to whether or not a crime was committed, and considering that Barr was and still is Meuller's boss at the time of the release. Why didn't Barr send the report back to Meuller with that instruction prior to releasing it?


HAHAHAHA!!!!! Because he is Trump's Battering Ram and Chief Spin Doctor! He is incapable of being honest!

William Barr is Trump's Heinrich Himmler.......

Reply
May 31, 2019 20:04:01   #
btbg
 
McKinneyMike wrote:
HAHAHAHA!!!!! Because he is Trump's Battering Ram and Chief Spin Doctor! He is incapable of being honest!

William Barr is Trump's Heinrich Himmler.......


Clearly you didn't bother to read the transcript of Crawford's interview with Barr.

It is very telling. He makes it clear that there is reason to believe there was wrongdoing and he spells out as much as he can during an investigation what kinds of things look wrong.

If you read the whole thing Barr comes out looking much better than Comey, McCabe, and Mueller. He also comes right out and says that the entire Russian collusion investigation against Trump is bogus. If you look at the evidence he is clearly correct.

They used information that they already knew to be false, or at the very least couldn't prove to be true in the application for the FISA warrant. Most damning of all is that Comey wrote confirmed about the allegations on the top of the FISA application when the timeline indicates that he knew at least part of the information was not true.

You guys are barking up the wrong tree. The real questions should be 1) Why did the Obama administration do nothing to stop the interference when they knew it was happening? (Barr made it clear that they are currently working to make sure it doesn't happen in 2020). It would have been much easier to stop the interference than to investigate Trump in the hope that he might be involved.
2) Why was only Trump investigated when the Ukranian government says that they attempted to interfere to help Hillary?
3) Why did they spy on Trump when it looks like they knew the basis for the spying was false?
4) Why did they then cover up the fact that they got the FISA warrant under false pretenses?
5) Who was involved in the spying? 6) Who knew about the spying, and when did they know about it?
6) Why are Democrats and the press trying so hard to keep Barr from declassifying documents?

Those are the questions that you should be asking yourself. Attacking Barr, who everyone agreed was non-partisan just months ago is a strange reaction. Why attack the messenger who is saying that something hinky happened? And finally why are Nagler, Comey, Schiff, and others still doubling down on things when Barr has just plain come out and said that the investigation is bogus. That should be more than enough said.

Reply
May 31, 2019 20:26:50   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
Frank T wrote:
I have a Barr question. If Barr was not satisfied with the report and felt that Meuller should make a determination as to whether or not a crime was committed, and considering that Barr was and still is Meuller's boss at the time of the release. Why didn't Barr send the report back to Meuller with that instruction prior to releasing it?


Because that would be tampering with the investigation.

Reply
May 31, 2019 20:27:56   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
btbg wrote:
Clearly you didn't bother to read the transcript of Crawford's interview with Barr.

It is very telling. He makes it clear that there is reason to believe there was wrongdoing and he spells out as much as he can during an investigation what kinds of things look wrong.

If you read the whole thing Barr comes out looking much better than Comey, McCabe, and Mueller. He also comes right out and says that the entire Russian collusion investigation against Trump is bogus. If you look at the evidence he is clearly correct.

They used information that they already knew to be false, or at the very least couldn't prove to be true in the application for the FISA warrant. Most damning of all is that Comey wrote confirmed about the allegations on the top of the FISA application when the timeline indicates that he knew at least part of the information was not true.

You guys are barking up the wrong tree. The real questions should be 1) Why did the Obama administration do nothing to stop the interference when they knew it was happening? (Barr made it clear that they are currently working to make sure it doesn't happen in 2020). It would have been much easier to stop the interference than to investigate Trump in the hope that he might be involved.
2) Why was only Trump investigated when the Ukranian government says that they attempted to interfere to help Hillary?
3) Why did they spy on Trump when it looks like they knew the basis for the spying was false?
4) Why did they then cover up the fact that they got the FISA warrant under false pretenses?
5) Who was involved in the spying? 6) Who knew about the spying, and when did they know about it?
6) Why are Democrats and the press trying so hard to keep Barr from declassifying documents?

Those are the questions that you should be asking yourself. Attacking Barr, who everyone agreed was non-partisan just months ago is a strange reaction. Why attack the messenger who is saying that something hinky happened? And finally why are Nagler, Comey, Schiff, and others still doubling down on things when Barr has just plain come out and said that the investigation is bogus. That should be more than enough said.
Clearly you didn't bother to read the transcript o... (show quote)


πŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌ

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2019 01:03:01   #
btbg
 
I notice that asking liberals pointed questions ends their involvement in a post. Not one attempt to answer questions. Just disappear from the conversation.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.