3D - In the Blue of the Night.
May 15, 2019 09:51:16 #
You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view in 3D.
2D converted to 3D.
2D converted to 3D.
May 15, 2019 09:58:29 #
May 15, 2019 10:19:22 #
May 15, 2019 11:05:14 #
Good job, Gaylord.
Can we see the image pair? Or just the original image?
Dave
Can we see the image pair? Or just the original image?
Dave
May 15, 2019 11:45:45 #
Uuglypher wrote:
Good job, Gaylord.
Can we see the image pair? Or just the original image?
Dave
Can we see the image pair? Or just the original image?
Dave
***
Original reduced to 800px per forum rules.
May 15, 2019 15:37:53 #
SoHillGuy wrote:
You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view in 3D.
2D converted to 3D.
2D converted to 3D.
Outstanding conversion, particularly since you dealt with so many overlapping elements.
I hope it's clear that the 3D was accomplished with only left/right displacement.
May 15, 2019 16:32:18 #
selmslie wrote:
Outstanding conversion, particularly since you dealt with so many overlapping elements.
I hope it's clear that the 3D was accomplished with only left/right displacement.
I hope it's clear that the 3D was accomplished with only left/right displacement.
***
What do you refer to when you said left/right displacement?
May 15, 2019 17:25:01 #
SoHillGuy wrote:
***
What do you refer to when you said left/right displacement?
What do you refer to when you said left/right displacement?
Although it is less obvious in this image than in other conversions you have done, if you look closely at the overlapping red and cyan images, each element that is not on the display surface is primarily displaced to the right or left of its counterpart. The effect is clearer in this image of yours.
This is also true of all of the 3D images thatyou and I have created using two separate captures. However, when the two images are not equally level, there may be some slight vertical displacement which is usually too little to detract from the 3D effect. This image of mine shows the left/right displacement more clearly because the 3D is more pronounced. The same is true of your image here.
The same principle is clear in the article you recommended, How To Create Anaglyph 3D Images That Really Work!.
It's clear that you understand and rely on this left/right principle whether you follow it instinctively or deliberately.
Anyone who fails to grasp the significance of left/right displacement is bound to have a very low success rate, as we have seen.
May 15, 2019 17:37:08 #
selmslie wrote:
Although it is less obvious in this image than in ... (show quote)
***
Thanks for the follow-up. I was thinking you were referring to two separate adjacent photos to make this image, left and right rather than being a 2D to 3D conversion.
May 15, 2019 18:08:05 #
SoHillGuy wrote:
***
Thanks for the follow-up. I was thinking you were referring to two separate adjacent photos to make this image, left and right rather than being a 2D to 3D conversion.
Thanks for the follow-up. I was thinking you were referring to two separate adjacent photos to make this image, left and right rather than being a 2D to 3D conversion.
Like you, I am not a fan of free viewing.
As you read this text your eyes are comfortably crossed so that you see a single image, at least on the early side of a few Margaritas. The 3D that we can easily recognize in an anaglyph is the result of only a small deviation from that position.
The challenge of free viewing is that it requires a large deviation from that position, something that is difficult and uncomfortable for most and not worth the effort for many.
Anyone who deliberately avoids anaglyph and insists only on free viewing is at best mistaken and at worst trying to hide something.
May 16, 2019 08:51:35 #
I don't have 3D glasses and I still like it in 2D.....very nice and attractive piece.
May 21, 2019 16:20:57 #
May 21, 2019 17:57:14 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.