Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Waterfalls
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 5, 2019 09:53:30   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
Went out yesterday to practice on waterfalls and getting the water to fog. Nikon d500, tamron 16-300 with a cpl filter, remote trigger and on a tripod. Ok now that I have the gear....can I get the water to fog....I think I did good! I metered for the highlights so they were not blown out, so then had to edit the blacks and shadows to bring out the rocks.

All critiques welcome .... could I have done better with composition or settings or even processing?

1st Waterfall, 1/10, f5.6 16mm iso 100
1st Waterfall, 1/10, f5.6 16mm iso 100...
(Download)

1st Waterfall, 1/10, f9, 22mm iso 100
1st Waterfall, 1/10, f9, 22mm iso 100...
(Download)

2nd Waterfall, 1/10, f16, 22mm iso 100
2nd Waterfall, 1/10, f16, 22mm iso 100...
(Download)

2nd Waterfall, 1/10, f13, 18mm iso 100
2nd Waterfall, 1/10, f13, 18mm iso 100...
(Download)

2nd Waterfall, 1/10, f14, 35mm iso 100
2nd Waterfall, 1/10, f14, 35mm iso 100...
(Download)

Reply
May 5, 2019 09:58:00   #
Tomfl101 Loc: Mount Airy, MD
 
I like them. The 10th sec shutter shows the motion of the water in a natural way. Really long exposures look cool but are far from realistic. Great job!

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:05:51   #
SpyderJan Loc: New Smyrna Beach. FL
 
I think you have achieved your goal on the first try Cindy. I like these more than the way overdone ones I have seen.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2019 10:12:05   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
In the last three the Shutter speed is too high. Decreasing it will increase the volume of water in the picture strengthening the subject (which is the water after all) and the composition.

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:21:50   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Looks to be about the right amount of silkiness for my tastes.
(I dislike it overdone, but for the blur extent a lot depends on the falls also.)

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:35:57   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
Fotoartist wrote:
In the last three the Shutter speed is too high. Decreasing it will increase the volume of water in the picture strengthening the subject (which is the water after all) and the composition.


What speed would you have used? Would you have used a higher shutter since there isn't much water flowing yet? I can go back to that location and play again. I see from your post how silky you got the water to be....may I ask what shutter speed you used on these....https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-590404-1.html

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:36:07   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
Tomfl101 wrote:
I like them. The 10th sec shutter shows the motion of the water in a natural way. Really long exposures look cool but are far from realistic. Great job!


Thanks!

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2019 10:36:19   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
SpyderJan wrote:
I think you have achieved your goal on the first try Cindy. I like these more than the way overdone ones I have seen.


Thank you!

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:36:43   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
Longshadow wrote:
Looks to be about the right amount of silkiness for my tastes.
(I dislike it overdone, but for the blur extent a lot depends on the falls also.)


Thanks!

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:42:25   #
mtbear
 
Where are these falls?

Reply
May 5, 2019 10:54:03   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
mtbear wrote:
Where are these falls?


1st one is at the Hungry Horse Damn in Hungry Horse Mt and the 2nd one is along Hwy 2 in the Middle Fork going towards Marias Pass in MT.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2019 12:05:07   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
CindyHouk wrote:
What speed would you have used? Would you have used a higher shutter since there isn't much water flowing yet? I can go back to that location and play again. I see from your post how silky you got the water to be....may I ask what shutter speed you used on these....https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-590404-1.html


Glad you asked. My first waterfall shot was a 3 seconds exposure. A little more than I had wished for but judging from the back of my camera it supplied enough water to make the picture interesting so I went with it. Shot at ISO 200, f 16. As you can see I could have increased the water flow by going to f 22 and a lower ISO but chose not to as even though there was not that much water I was losing too much texture in it.

My second waterfall shot was of a smaller falls that was flowing more strongly and visibly so I had to adjust the F stop and shutter speed to not lose texture in the water. This one was shot at about 1 second shutter speed. The size of the waterfall and amount of water showing and flowing are the main determinates for me. And, as is always the case, don't blow out detail in the whites. I push the boundary as far as I can by checking the LCD image and checking the Histogram.





Reply
May 5, 2019 14:34:52   #
CindyHouk Loc: Nw MT
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Glad you asked. My first waterfall shot was a 3 seconds exposure. A little more than I had wished for but judging from the back of my camera it supplied enough water to make the picture interesting so I went with it. Shot at ISO 200, f 16. As you can see I could have increased the water flow by going to f 22 and a lower ISO but chose not to as even though there was not that much water I was losing too much texture in it.

My second waterfall shot was of a smaller falls that was flowing more strongly and visibly so I had to adjust the F stop and shutter speed to not lose texture in the water. This one was shot at about 1 second shutter speed. The size of the waterfall and amount of water showing and flowing are the main determinates for me. And, as is always the case, don't blow out detail in the whites. I push the boundary as far as I can by checking the LCD image and checking the Histogram.
Glad you asked. My first waterfall shot was a 3 se... (show quote)


Thanks for the explanation! I will be going back and playing again with high shutter speeds to see what outcome I get....appreciate the help.

Reply
May 5, 2019 18:31:26   #
mtbear
 
CindyHouk wrote:
1st one is at the Hungry Horse Damn in Hungry Horse Mt and the 2nd one is along Hwy 2 in the Middle Fork going towards Marias Pass in MT.


Thanks

Reply
May 5, 2019 18:33:14   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Lower shutter speeds, lower ISOs, plus higher F stops.
Sometimes you can use a polarizer to lower shutter speed or a Neutral density filter too.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.