Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
200-500 lens need a teleconverter?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Feb 26, 2019 17:50:20   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
wolfman wrote:
Better lenses usually cost more. Better build quality, completely weather sealed, sharper, and an extra 100 mm of reach. And further more, the focusing at 6.3 is just as fast as at 5.6.
It also plays very well with the Sigma 1.4 TC.


In theory, focusing at f6.3 will NEVER be as good as f5.6 all things being equal ......especially in lower light.

Reply
Feb 26, 2019 23:53:12   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
Gene51 wrote:
Thanks! There is a lot of confusion coupled with cognitive dissonance preventing people from accepting the truth behind testing, laws of physics and common sense reasoning. Add to that the notion that somehow it is not possible to outdo a Nikkor lens on a Nikon camera - and that's how so many 200-500 mm lenses get sold. I much prefer using my Sigma Sport to anything other than my 600mmF4, other than those times when I can use a lower ISO/faster shutter in crappy light, and don't mind carrying an extra 6 lbs of tripod and head.

That being said, I took my Sport out late last month and got this image, hand-held, in less than ideal light. It's a portrait crop from a landscape image, so it's about 17 mp or a little less than 50% of the original image area:

.
Thanks! There is a lot of confusion coupled with c... (show quote)


Good shot, Gene, If I had a Nikon 600mm f/4 I wouldn't shoot with a 150-600 Sigma for love nor money.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.