`
Chris T wrote:
I don't mind EVFs - all of my SLTs have
'em. Not sure I like MILCs, tho'.
Now THAT is a rather puzzlesome remark.
Never seen anything along that line, prolly
cuz SLT users are a not very numerous.
Neville the lesch, it do puzzle me that you
would self identify as an SLT user but are
"not sure I like MILCs tho" cuz in my mind
you are already happily using one.
With the SLT you are already using an EVF
so the Big Bugaboo is no issue here. I use
"MILC"s sometimes with the LAE4 A-mount
AF drive adapter which includes a complete
SLT PDAF unit ... ignores the CDAF unit in
the camera body. So, I'm as much an SLT
user as you are, except my camera looks a
bit weird.
Now you are offered an SLR shaped body
with dual/hybrid AF systems, immune to
AF micro-errors, minus the delicate mirror,
and I can't really fathom how you draw the
line between"SLT" and "MILC". Especially
since my own cameras easily transmogrify
back and forth between the two as easily
swapping a lens. Pray tell whuzzup widdat ?
Taking a wild WILD guess, the new Canon
appears to be quite perfectly designed just
for you so it triggers an "it's too good to be
true" reaction ... which IS a healthy dose of
cautiousness in all things ... and it therefor
leads you to doubt the obvious choice. Just
a wild guess ...
.