Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Idaho Lawmakers Push Bill That Would Treat A******n as Murder
Page 1 of 10 next> last>>
Jan 30, 2019 14:49:14   #
Vietnam Vet
 
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/idaho-lawmakers-push-bill-treat-a******n-really-murder/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2019-01-30&utm_campaign=manualpost

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 14:51:17   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
This will be going to the Supreme Court sometime in the near future.
I look for a******n to become illegal if Pres Trump gets to nominate another justice.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:20:45   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
That's great, does that mean the judges are going to pay for the kids up bring since most single mothers can barely afford to feed themselves?

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2019 15:31:50   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
Kraken wrote:
That's great, does that mean the judges are going to pay for the kids up bring since most single mothers can barely afford to feed themselves?


There is always adoption.................

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:46:13   #
pendennis
 
Kraken wrote:
That's great, does that mean the judges are going to pay for the kids up bring since most single mothers can barely afford to feed themselves?


Typical left canard. Try to turn logic on its head. They're incapable of thinking end-to-end logically.

When a woman gets pregnant, in the vast majority of cases, it has taken two to create the baby. Anyone who engages in sex knows that there's a chance the woman will end up pregnant; and it's incumbent on the parties to insure that the resulting baby is cared for and raised.

The judges didn't get anyone pregnant. Guess those mothers better find the father.

It's murder, pure and simple, to k**l an unborn infant. Science, which I trust far more than judges, has found that the infant's heartbeat is detectable far earlier than once thought. This isn't a religious issue; it's one of morality, and how we treat humans from birth to death.

Oh, it's called free will.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:47:40   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
This law will make a******n illegal for poor people. Rich people and congressmen's girlfriend will always be able to get them.
Why is it that old men are the ones that want to control women's bodies?
Dont like a******n? Dont friggin get one.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:53:49   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
pendennis wrote:
Typical left canard. Try to turn logic on its head. They're incapable of thinking end-to-end logically.

When a woman gets pregnant, in the vast majority of cases, it has taken two to create the baby. Anyone who engages in sex knows that there's a chance the woman will end up pregnant; and it's incumbent on the parties to insure that the resulting baby is cared for and raised.

The judges didn't get anyone pregnant. Guess those mothers better find the father.

It's murder, pure and simple, to k**l an unborn infant. Science, which I trust far more than judges, has found that the infant's heartbeat is detectable far earlier than once thought. This isn't a religious issue; it's one of morality, and how we treat humans from birth to death.

Oh, it's called free will.
Typical left canard. Try to turn logic on its hea... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2019 15:55:35   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
Frank T wrote:
This law will make a******n illegal for poor people. Rich people and congressmen's girlfriend will always be able to get them.
Why is it that old men are the ones that want to control women's bodies?
Dont like a******n? Dont friggin get one.


Well I guess women will be making better choices. Like maybe getting married, finding a responsible man.
Using birth control etc.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:56:12   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
I am really trying hard not to be crude................................

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:56:40   #
jcboy3
 
Vietnam Vet wrote:
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/idaho-lawmakers-push-bill-treat-a******n-really-murder/?utm_source=push&utm_medium=conservativetribune&utm_content=2019-01-30&utm_campaign=manualpost


Maybe pregnant women in idaho will be rushing to the a******n clinics to clear the pipes before the law goes into effect.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 15:57:19   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
Also with that sick law NY passed I am glad someone is going to the extreme in the opposite direction.
Its time someone takes a stand.

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2019 16:44:20   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
pendennis wrote:
Typical left canard. Try to turn logic on its head. They're incapable of thinking end-to-end logically.

When a woman gets pregnant, in the vast majority of cases, it has taken two to create the baby. Anyone who engages in sex knows that there's a chance the woman will end up pregnant; and it's incumbent on the parties to insure that the resulting baby is cared for and raised.

The judges didn't get anyone pregnant. Guess those mothers better find the father.

It's murder, pure and simple, to k**l an unborn infant. Science, which I trust far more than judges, has found that the infant's heartbeat is detectable far earlier than once thought. This isn't a religious issue; it's one of morality, and how we treat humans from birth to death.

Oh, it's called free will.
Typical left canard. Try to turn logic on its hea... (show quote)


The problem here is where do you draw the line. At fertilization? or before. Or at what time in the pregnancy. Roe v wade suggested viability as the marker. How do you descriminate between the mothers right to life and/or the embryo. An arbitrary edict is exactly that. One might argue that it a state issue and none of the feds business. There must be limits, what are they? nThere are no right/wrong positions. Only opinions. The supreme court's decision, is after all an opinion. there is no hard and fact scientific answer to these queestions. Some say morality--That too varies as well. The definition of murder varies as well, when is k*****g justified? Too many questions with no "correct"answers. I have my opinion you have yours- who is correct, who is wrong?

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 16:49:45   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
Making a******n illegal doesnt stop.a******ns. It stops safe a******ns.
Why must you people try to make others live by your rules?
Tell you what, work on priests not sexually abusing children. When you fix that, well talk.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 17:01:34   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Frank T wrote:
Making a******n illegal doesnt stop.a******ns. It stops safe a******ns.
Why must you people try to make others live by your rules?
Tell you what, work on priests not sexually abusing children. When you fix that, we'll talk.



Reply
Jan 30, 2019 17:20:24   #
jcboy3
 
Libertarian party platform:

"1.5 A******n

Recognizing that a******n is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration."

Meaning no government funding, no government restrictions.

Reply
Page 1 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.