In Test, DHS Cuts Through Trump’s Steel Slat Wall With A Saw
Jan 10, 2019 09:54:50 #
Jan 10, 2019 10:13:18 #
dirtpusher wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/01/10/in-test-dhs-cuts-through-trumps-steel-slat-wall-with-a-saw.html
Now is not that the reason of a prototype to be used and tested for integrity? Many prototypes of products dont make it to market. So what is the big deal?
Jan 10, 2019 10:24:44 #
[quote=incognito]Now is not that the reason of a prototype to be used and tested for integrity? Many prototypes of products dont make it to market. So what is the big deal?[/quo
None have passed test
None have passed test
Jan 10, 2019 10:31:33 #
incognito wrote:
Now is not that the reason of a prototype to be used and tested for integrity? Many prototypes of products dont make it to market. So what is the big deal?
Here Israeli wall
Jan 10, 2019 10:33:29 #
incognito wrote:
Now is not that the reason of a prototype to be used and tested for integrity? Many prototypes of products dont make it to market. So what is the big deal?
An there these drug smuggling
https://youtu.be/DLVdi14ECCc
Jan 10, 2019 12:54:31 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Still missing the point of a prototype. I guess you are not a rocket scientist, mechanical engineer, or model maker.
Jan 10, 2019 16:42:42 #
incognito wrote:
Still missing the point of a prototype. I guess you are not a rocket scientist, mechanical engineer, or model maker.
They all failed. An using them to build now today. G yuh protos wat they using in case yuh not noticed. Lol
Jan 10, 2019 16:44:02 #
Jan 10, 2019 16:51:55 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
incognito wrote:
Now is not that the reason of a prototype to be used and tested for integrity? Many prototypes of products dont make it to market. So what is the big deal?
It would at least tend to indicate the current estimate is too low. Tests like that should have been performed before even building the prototypes.
Jan 10, 2019 16:53:43 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
incognito wrote:
Still missing the point of a prototype. I guess you are not a rocket scientist, mechanical engineer, or model maker.
Should have been tested in lab first. Would have been much cheaper than building full size prototypes.
Jan 10, 2019 16:55:41 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
incognito wrote:
Still missing the point of a prototype. I guess you are not a rocket scientist, mechanical engineer, or model maker.
The big deal is he is demanding money to build the wall and we don't have a product to build.
Jan 10, 2019 17:04:18 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
thom w wrote:
The big deal is he is demanding money to build the wall and we don't have a product to build.
That was ONE prototype submitted and was not the concrete requested ... so this entire thread is based on l*****t dishonesty.
Jan 10, 2019 18:41:10 #
That is ok. Just one more spoon fed crap from the media. How bout we just cut thru the sh-t(pun intended)and try for some honesty. Here is what was left out of the headlines. DUH this was direct quote from the NBC news article.!! "While the design currently being constructed was informed by what we learned in the prototypes, it does not replicate those designs," said Waldman. "The steel bollard design is internally reinforced with materials that require time and multiple industrial tools to breach, thereby providing U.S. Border Patrol agents additional response time to affect a successful law enforcement resolution. In the event that one of the steel bollards becomes damaged, it is quick and cost-effective to repair.
"The professionals on the border know that a wall system is intended not only to prevent entry, it is intended to defer and to increase the amount of time and effort it takes for one to enter so that we can respond with limited border patrol agents. Even a wall that is being breached is a valuable tool in that it allows us to respond to the attempted illegal entry."
In response to KPBS, CBP spokesman Ralph DeSio said the prototypes "were not and cannot be designed to be indestructible," but were designed to "impede or deny efforts to scale, breach, or dig under such a barrier, giving agents time to respond."
"The professionals on the border know that a wall system is intended not only to prevent entry, it is intended to defer and to increase the amount of time and effort it takes for one to enter so that we can respond with limited border patrol agents. Even a wall that is being breached is a valuable tool in that it allows us to respond to the attempted illegal entry."
In response to KPBS, CBP spokesman Ralph DeSio said the prototypes "were not and cannot be designed to be indestructible," but were designed to "impede or deny efforts to scale, breach, or dig under such a barrier, giving agents time to respond."
Jan 10, 2019 20:25:04 #
Shutterbug1697
Loc: Northeast
incognito wrote:
Now is not that the reason of a prototype to be used and tested for integrity? Many prototypes of products dont make it to market. So what is the big deal?
Every single prototype that was erected for trump's inspection last year have FAILED their tests!
So just what does he need all that money for, when there's nothing ready to erect?
He can have what he needs to increase border security, hire more border control agents, and improve technology, but that's not good enough for him, so he puts 380,000 out on furlough, and makes another 420,000 work without getting paid.
There have already been 2 court cases filed in Federal Court, and when the vast majority of those 800,000 don't get paid tomorrow, there will be massive lawsuits filed tomorrow.
Those 17 new lawyers that were just hired are going to be really busy starting tomorrow morning!
Jan 10, 2019 20:59:28 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Every single prototype that was erected for trump's inspection last year have FAILED their tests!
Wrong:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-border-wall-test-20180119-story.html%3foutputType=amp
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.