A couple for David
Nov 30, 2018 18:02:45 #
I hope these might be suitable for your purposes.
Nov 30, 2018 22:12:32 #
Nov 30, 2018 22:49:49 #
Nov 30, 2018 23:04:58 #
Nov 30, 2018 23:13:53 #
Dec 1, 2018 01:37:50 #
Dec 1, 2018 01:54:47 #
Dec 1, 2018 10:04:50 #
Riverrat2 wrote:
I hope these might be suitable for your purposes.
Nice shots.
Dec 1, 2018 10:06:55 #
Dec 1, 2018 10:43:03 #
Riverrat2 wrote:
I hope these might be suitable for your purposes.
Excellent, Riverrar2!
Dec 1, 2018 11:00:15 #
Dec 1, 2018 12:51:46 #
Riverrat2 wrote:
I hope these might be suitable for your purposes.
Hi, Lloyd,
Thanks for thinking of me!
The osprey image does provide a reasonable, but not an exceptional 3D eff3ct on conversion.
The avocet, on 3D conversion reveals good revelation of contours and mass characterization of the head, neck, breast, and upper left leg, but the left wing, seemingly the one closer to the viewer, is elevated into essentiallythe same plane as occupied by the right wing, so no notable 3D differentiation is evident in regard to the planes of the two wings.
Would you mind, Lloyd, if I posted the 3D conversion of your long-billed curlew image? It exhibits an exceptionally fine example of how an appropriate pose of a subject can contribute to an exceptionally fine 3D effect for those capable of viewing stereo image pairs. It might help other readers of this thread understand a bit more of what we are talking about.
Best regards,
Dave
Dec 1, 2018 14:12:44 #
Dec 2, 2018 11:26:47 #
Riverrat2 wrote:
Sure! Go ahead and post/explain.
Hi, Riverrat2,
Here is the 3D conversion of your long-billed curlew image, arranged for Parallel Gaze viewing as well as for Crossed Gaze viewing.
I am also including some handouts on how to use those two viewing techniques that have proven useful at presentations and workshops. Also, the attendees at BiolCom2018, an international congress at which I presented my techniques of 3D conversion reported that these handouts were particularly helpful to those previously unfamiliar with viewing 3D image pairs.
The relatively wide separation of the bird’s wingtips along the image’s diagonal makes this image a particularly strong candidate for 3D conversion.
In the same way, strong spatial separation of significant foreground detail and significant middle ground and background details across the span of the scene likewise increases the likelihood of a strong 3D effect with 3D conversion.
Note: I had a bit of trouble with the order in which the image were posted.
The last one...”The Blue Dot Test” ...should be the first one. If you can’t pass the Blue dot test...there is no sense trying to view the stereo image pairs; you are among the 10% of our population who are “stereoblind” ...or, at least, should get an appointment with an optometrist or ophthalmologist for an official diagnosis.
All comments are welcomed. I am particularly interested in learning, from those able to successfully view these stereo image pairs for 3D effect, which of the two viewing techniques you prefer.
Dave
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.