Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
...taking a photo undermines your memory
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
Aug 30, 2018 08:51:33   #
dumbo
 
Pray tell what those initials mean. Please. Thanks.

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 09:01:35   #
twillsol Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
ppage wrote:
Rubbish. The very act of recognizing the scene or the object and focusing on recording it, imprints the memory in your brain. I not only recall the scenes clearly, I can remember the various efforts I put into photographing it like how I climbed that hill, got wet in the surf, waited forever for the animal to look at me, how I raced to the scene so I wouldn't miss the sunrise or sunset light. I remember the scenes and objects vividly because
I was intensely engaged. I also have the added bonus of a photographic record of it to enjoy repeatedly for all time and to share the moment with others.
Rubbish. The very act of recognizing the scene or... (show quote)


I agree!

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 09:14:29   #
jwest Loc: South Dakota
 
DWHart24 wrote:
I agree with that article to a certain degree. I shoot a lot of airshows and at times I find myself thinking what it would be like to just watch the show without worrying about getting the shot. It is hard to "take it all in" when you are concentrating on "getting the shot".


I agree that in an action event you lose the perspective of what is happening around you. I shoot dog shows and completely miss the action, judging, and winners because I’m concentrating on specific dogs and shots. Landscape or static shots I think it works the other way.

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2018 09:18:10   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Writers get paid to write, regardless of the validity of the article.

Personally, I find myself more engaged with what I photograph than that which I just observe.
--Bob
kjfishman wrote:
We get magazine called Bottom Line. What do you think about the small article...taking a photo undermines your memory ? My wife suggested I take too many photos.

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 09:18:26   #
DWHart24 Loc: Central Florida
 
jwest wrote:
I agree that in an action event you lose the perspective of what is happening around you. I shoot dog shows and completely miss the action, judging, and winners because I’m concentrating on specific dogs and shots. Landscape or static shots I think it works the other way.


Yes, I agree, it does depend on the subject and what you're are shooting.

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 09:29:54   #
donrosshill Loc: Delaware & Florida
 
Well said Jerry.
Don

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 09:30:09   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Strong memories are associated with emotion. You will remember things that you're emotionally attached to. The goal in making a great photo is to be able to show the emotion you had and evoke that emotion in the viewer. The distraction of photographic technique and processes will be minimal in a scene that you're emotionally attached to. You'll remember it.

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2018 10:04:12   #
shangyrhee Loc: Nashville TN to Sacramento CA
 
BS for the serious photography but half truth for a snapper like me Hahaha. Shang

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 10:06:24   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
My experience has been just the opposite. As I organize photos after a trip my memory is reinforced as I think about where and when a certain shot was taken. My wife agrees: My slide shows reinforce or even help her realize where we have been and what we have seen.

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 10:10:40   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
You make two assertions:

(1) there is a great deal of truth in the fact that snapshots detract from the memory of an experience

(2) But those who take 1000’s of pictures of travel experiences definitely lose the depth of experience.

Please provide Web-links or citations to other sources which support your assertions.
dumbo wrote:
Despite all the responses of “rubbish”, there is a great deal of truth in the fact that snapshots detract from the memory of an experience. My wife actually takes far fewer photos than I do. But when she does, she has the eyes of an artist.
Her photographs going back 50 years are simply worthy of professional enlargements. I have graduated from a Rollieflex to Nikons to the SONY mirrorless. A picture can unquestionably help one recall a wonderful moment. But those who take 1000’s of pictures of travel experiences definitely lose the depth of experience.
When we examine contact sheets going back 50 years, it’s hard to relive the experience. However when a UHH photographer works very hard to capture an excellent reproduction of a single experience, their photos can approach the museum-worthy quality of the experience. Many of our UHH friends have to deny the reality of in-depth experience.
One is always entitled to what they feel and believe.
Despite all the responses of “rubbish”, there is a... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 10:20:40   #
cr1218
 
“Seventy-five years ago, tourism was about experience-seeking. Now it’s about using photography and social media to build a personal brand. In a sense, for a lot of people, the photos you take on a trip become more important than the experience.”
article about "overtourism": https://centralnewsnow.com/2018/08/overtourism-worries-europe-how-much-did-technology-help-get-us-there/

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2018 10:21:08   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
It may reduce my memory but Photography keeps my mind sharp and alert to the world around me.

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 10:59:07   #
tommystrat Loc: Bigfork, Montana
 
I had a comment but I forgot what it was...

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 11:10:45   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Impossible: "The goal in making a great photo is to be able to show the emotion you had and evoke that emotion in the viewer."

As photographers, we cannot put ourselves in the shoes of another to know what touches and moves him or her. But yes, the content of a photograph may affect the mood of the viewer beyond visual pleasure, yet the photographer cannot control this response.

As well, time and circumstance negate this platitude of photography; for example, who after a hundred years will know with any confidence what intention you had in mind when you released the shutter? It is more likely that the social environment of the time and place will influence the perception of the viewer, not something remote to him or her.

Trying to mold a photograph to function as a conduit for felt personal emotion from one to another both limits and distorts the singular purpose of photography as a visual medium of human expression.
gvarner wrote:
Strong memories are associated with emotion. You will remember things that you're emotionally attached to. The goal in making a great photo is to be able to show the emotion you had and evoke that emotion in the viewer. The distraction of photographic technique and processes will be minimal in a scene that you're emotionally attached to. You'll remember it.

Reply
Aug 30, 2018 11:11:17   #
Stephan G
 
anotherview wrote:
You make two assertions:

(1) there is a great deal of truth in the fact that snapshots detract from the memory of an experience

(2) But those who take 1000’s of pictures of travel experiences definitely lose the depth of experience.

Please provide Web-links or citations to other sources which support your assertions.


It comes down to one term. "Sensory Overload". There are many tomes, some centuries old, that speak of it. And many in the field of Psychology. (And a few in the field of Espionage along with sense deprivation.)

We need to define "memory of experience". It is too broad of a term. One may enjoy the minute of the experience just as one enjoying the expanse of the experience. The particulars of the memory vary.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.