I swallowed a dictionary.
It gave me thesaurus throat I've ever had.
woodworkerman wrote:
I swallowed a dictionary.
It gave me thesaurus throat I've ever had.
That was a really bad(good) pun. Bill
melismus wrote:
May your dick shun nary a lady.
THAT IS DISGUSTING! YOU ARE SICK!!!
woodworkerman wrote:
THAT IS DISGUSTING! YOU ARE SICK!!!
Oh, get over yourself. I thought it was really clever!
woodworkerman wrote:
I swallowed a dictionary.
It gave me thesaurus throat I've ever had.
Cute! Thanks for my morning laugh!
Hal81
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
Well! Ive never been more homognized in all my life.
woodworkerman wrote:
THAT IS DISGUSTING! YOU ARE SICK!!!
That was uncalled for. Thinking maybe you did not mean to be offensive and trite, I went to the dictionary. Disgusting means acutely repugnant, loathsome,or repellant. That fit none of those, It only fits sick in the forth sense,weary, tired. Maybe he was making a statement about your lame and infantile puns. So, I ask you to qualify your statements. Please do not reference me to a dictionary, or a Bible, I read both. Do not feel the need to answer, because a non answer will, in this case be an answer.But I am interested in how you, in this day and age, justify that statement. Now, if if was opinion, please, before you make a statement, let one know, I mean, heck an opinion is one of many things we all have. Thank you
I'll be clear. The so called joke by melismas was repulsive. Anyone who thinks this kind of sexual humor is acceptable, please be certain to never read my "infantile puns." AND, whether you like it or not, I DO BELIEVE the Bible and respect it, it's principles and our Creator. It is your choice to not believe it. I can't influence that.
I like clean humor, puns or otherwise. That is the only kind I would ever post.
I have seen others post some 'blue' humor and have just ignored it and NOT posted criticisms to them. But when someone takes my little bit of a joke and responds with filth, I will criticize whether you like it or not. Our society and the quality in our culture is never enhanced by gutter humor. That just drags us down.
So get over yourself.
woodworkerman wrote:
I'll be clear. The so called joke by melismas was repulsive. Anyone who thinks this kind of sexual humor is acceptable, please be certain to never read my "infantile puns." AND, whether you like it or not, I DO BELIEVE the Bible and respect it, it's principles and our Creator. It is your choice to not believe it. I can't influence that.
I like clean humor, puns or otherwise. That is the only kind I would ever post.
I have seen others post some 'blue' humor and have just ignored it and NOT posted criticisms to them. But when someone takes my little bit of a joke and responds with filth, I will criticize whether you like it or not. Our society and the quality in our culture is never enhanced by gutter humor. That just drags us down.
So get over yourself.
I'll be clear. The so called joke by melismas was ... (
show quote)
Do not deny bible. Decry biased, uncalled for comments. And that wasn't much of a qualification. Just a reaffirmation of your dogma
newtoyou wrote:
Do not deny bible. Decry biased, uncalled for comments.
I AM biased against filth. When anyone "attaches" filth to a post of mine, my criticism of that attachment IS CALLED FOR and will be delivered.
woodworkerman wrote:
I AM biased against filth. When anyone "attaches" filth to a post of mine, my criticism of that attachment IS CALLED FOR and will be delivered.
My point,sir, was that I did not find it to be filth. Bad taste, but not filth. So, I see our difference of opinion. I want to know why you think the pun was "filth"
newtoyou wrote:
Do not deny bible. Decry biased, uncalled for comments. And that wasn't much of a qualification. Just a reaffirmation of your dogma
Deny deny deny deny...blech in this day and age to hold up the bible as a beacon of saintly righteousness is disgusting
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.