This ruling is in direct opposition to a recent Federal Court ruling in Virginia where the concept of Fair Use was expanded to allow reproduction of copywritten works without compensation.
http://copyright.nova.edu/photographs/
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
This ruling is in direct opposition to a recent Federal Court ruling in Virginia where the concept of Fair Use was expanded to allow reproduction of copywritten works without compensation.
http://copyright.nova.edu/photographs/As explained in the article, the Virginia ruling is absolute idiocy and is not precedent or binding in any case, since it is not an appellate decision
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.