Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
HDR Photography -- Before and After
Auraura and NIK HDR Efex Pro 2
Mar 9, 2018 13:11:26   #
Pdeblieck Loc: Northern California
 
I'm curious which everyone prefers and why. I just purchase Aurora and I like it. But, I find NIK provides a little more detail and Less noise.

Created using eleven 1 E.V. brackets, with a Canon T5i. Everyone's comments are appreciated.

Aurora - Hartstone Lodge - City Scape Plugin
Aurora - Hartstone Lodge - City Scape Plugin...
(Download)

NIK HDR Efex Pro 2 - Hartstone Lodge - Structureized 2 Plugin
NIK HDR Efex Pro 2 - Hartstone Lodge - Structureiz...
(Download)

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 13:19:33   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
I prefer the color palate in the Nix version. It is realistic without being too "HDR." The first image, IMHO, is too subdued.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 13:24:13   #
Pdeblieck Loc: Northern California
 
I tend to agree with you. My aim is realism. NIK seems to do a better job. Only draw back, doesn’t work with RAW files.

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2018 13:26:22   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
I don’t use either one but couldn’t you have opened the first to equal the results in the second example?

Dennis

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 13:31:12   #
Pdeblieck Loc: Northern California
 
Not sure what you mean? I could have opened them in GIMP or Luminar and done some added editing. What I want is reactions right out of these two programs prior to additional editing.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 13:55:36   #
rdgreenwood Loc: Kennett Square, Pennsylvania
 
Pdeblieck wrote:
I tend to agree with you. My aim is realism. NIK seems to do a better job. Only draw back, doesn’t work with RAW files.

First of all, when you’re responding to someone, hit “Quote Reply” so we know to whom you’re responding. Second, and more important, Nik will work with RAW files.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 14:09:54   #
Pdeblieck Loc: Northern California
 
rdgreenwood wrote:
First of all, when you’re responding to someone, hit “Quote Reply” so we know to whom you’re responding. Second, and more important, Nik will work with RAW files.


You are correct. NIK will work as a plug-in for Lightroom and GIMP. But it does not work with RAW files as a stand-alone program.

Please excuse my mistakes in replying, I am new to Ugly Hedgehog.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2018 19:53:40   #
ImageCreator Loc: Northern California
 
I prefer #2. I sometimes have used NIK, but prefer Photomatix. Still, the end result is what's important, not so much how you get there. Will be looking to see some more of your creations.

Reply
Sep 11, 2020 17:31:12   #
brent46 Loc: Grand Island, NY
 
It will open tiff files

Reply
Sep 14, 2020 10:46:26   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
I like the second better. But I suspect you could get the same result with a single RAW image. Can you post the single images?

Reply
Jan 16, 2021 13:49:30   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
Second. I love the kick of the colors😢💕

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
HDR Photography -- Before and After
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.