Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Advice from the Pros
Recommended resizing parameters for digital images
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Aug 14, 2020 15:00:18   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
Thanks much, very helpful

Reply
May 1, 2021 12:51:44   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
As DSLRs increase in MegaPixels (MP), larger high quality prints can be made from the larger and larger files created by these cameras. However, these larger files make it more difficult for the photographer to electronically share their images due to these ever larger file sizes. Big is good, but bigger is not always better when working with digital images. This post explains the process of resizing digital images specifically for online display and file sharing.

The documented limit to a single attachment in UHH is 20MB (MegaByte). The high-quality JPEG files created by sensors such as the Nikon D850 now exceed the UHH limit where the photographer will need to use software tools to resize their image under the 20MB size limit. Sharing these images via email to family and friends requires even more action to create files that can be sent using popular email systems such as GMail, YahooMail, etc.

Consider the pixel / megapixel dimensions of a few popular models based on a 3x2 aspect ratio:

Nikon

D850 - 8,256 × 5,504 (45.4 MP)
D7200 - 6000 × 4000 (24 MP)

Canon

5DIV - 6720 × 4480 (30.1 MP)
80D - 6000 × 4000 (24 MP)

This post was developed with input from several UHH experts. The topic is organized with background on the pixel resolution of digital images and high-resolution wide-angle displays. We've collected instructions for popular photo-editing software to demonstrate how to resize digital images for electronic sharing. Special thank you's to members jerryc41, Gene51, Bob Yankle, TheDmann and Rongnongno for help in pulling this together.

Display resolution of your monitor

Many of us are now using "Full High-Definition" monitors. These "FHD1080" screens display at 1920x1080-pixels based on a 16x9 ratio. An image cropped to exactly 1920x1080px will exactly fill the dimensions of the FHD1080 screen when viewed at 100%. Your 1920x1080 image on your 16x9 screen will display "full screen" at a 100% zoom.

But, what about your 3x2 images? The 3x2 image is the traditional ratio of a frame of 35mm film in landscape orientation. As shown for the DSRL models above, 3x2 is the native ratio of images coming from the sensors in these cameras.

The screen resolution determines how the digital image is displayed. The FHD1080 screen will automatically scale a "large" image to fit the shorter side of the display. If you maintain the 3x2 ratio and use editing software to resize the long-side of your image to 2048-pixels, the "long-size" is wider than the width of the FHD1080 monitor (2048px > 1920px). The "short-side" is also greater than the height of the FHD1080 screen, (1365px > 1080px).

Your 3x2 image, when resized to 2048x1365, will be dynamically resized to 1620x1080 when displayed on your FHD1080. Your 3x2 image "fills" the vertical dimension with some unused margins on the left and right sides (1620px < 1920px). At this point the image is slightly less than 100% as the shorter-side (1365-pixels) has been resized to fit the screen height of 1080px. Clicking on the image to zoom to 100% will "expand" the image to fill the left and right margins of the 1920px display, using a 100% crop of size 1920x1080 from within the larger image having dimensions of 2048x1365.

The example below shows a 3x2 image on the left and a 16x9 crop of the same image on the right, both shown on a 1920x1080 Full High-Definition monitor.

Dynamic Resize Example


Sharing Images on photo sites such as Facebook, UHH, Flickr, etc

When you've completed your edits on an image from your Nikon D7200 and now want to share the image, this is where resizing the image comes into play. How you resize the image depends on the intended use. You can crop the image to 1920x1080 for use on "modern" FHD1080 displays (modern as in circa 2018). When you select a crop using a 16x9 ratio, your crop will maintain the width of your original 3x2 image, but the top and bottom will be cropped from the landscape-oriented image. See the portions of the image “lost” from above and below the cat in the examples above.

An easier approach is to simply maintain the original 3x2 ratio and specify a length on the long-side that matches (or slightly exceeds) the FHD1080 display that uses 1920-pixels on the long-side. The left version of the cat with the "margins" shows a 3x2 image that nearly fills the FHD1080 screen using an image sized 2048px on the long-side. Although you've "oversized" the image, the 2048-pixel long-side is much closer to the screen dimensions for people viewing your image than attempting to send them a file with dimensions 6000x4000-pixels. Unless zooming into a crop of the image, the 6000x4000 image displays like the cat above on the left exactly the same as a file at 2048x1365.

Digital images on image-sharing sites are intended for full-screen display on high-resolution monitors. This usage applies equally to UHH attachments as well as high-resolution uploads to Facebook, Flickr, 500px and similar social media and image sharing sites. Facebook now supports a maximum of 2048-pixels on the long-side. Using 2048-pixels on the long-side allows some "zoom" into the details when viewed at 100% on an FHD1080 monitor. Using 2048px creates a file around 1MB to 3MB when saved to disk, depending on the source camera, whether the image is cropped from the original, and assuming 100% JPEG quality.

Resizing your display files to a standard 2048-pixels on the long-side is intended for general use and for all crop ratios, 4x3, 1x1, 16:9, and so forth.

Sharing images via email

Continuing to use the 2048-pixel length on the long-side, one can begin to adjust the JPEG quality. The goal is to lower the JPEG quality to reduce the file size as an attachment without lowering the quality of the image when viewed by the email recipients. Your friends / family using FHD1080 displays should receive an image that fills (or nearly fills) their screen when viewed.

Sharing a single image as a 1.5MB attachment should not cause undo delay for the email sender nor receiver. But, if you have multiple files to share, you should lower the JPEG quality to reduce the file size. Differences in the quality values from 99% to 80% typically cannot be seen by the human eye when displayed full-screen on an FHD1080 screen. The lower the quality value, the more compression is applied to the JPEG image creating a much smaller file. Below 80% one can begin to see degradation of the image when viewed full-screen on an FHD1080 display.

Creating images for other digital uses

Website design seeks to maximize the viewing experience for the site. Larger images render slower. The page / site Design Lead will specify the exact dimensions and quality settings for images on their site.

If you're interested in image-size recommendations for popular social media sites, visit Always Up-to-date Guide to Social Media Sizes using the link below in the section "Reference Links".

Is 80% Quality the best for all software?

The How-To samples, below, specify a common 80% quality. However, the compression engine specific to each software may differ from the results of others. Consider adjusting the quality value if your results differ when viewed full-screen on your display screen. Consider 5% changes in the JPEG Quality such as 85% or 90% or 95% until you determine the value best for your needs. You might also continue to lower the quality below 80%, again, as needed.

Impact of changes to JPEG Quality


What are DPI / PPI?

Q: Does DPI / PPI affect the image display?
ANS: No

DPI - Dots Per Inch
PPI - Pixels Per Inch

A digital image has only a pixel dimension. The image file may report a DPI value of 72 / 96 / 250 / 300 / etc when the file properties are viewed from the operating system. The DPI value has no impact on how the file is displayed electronically. In the ReSize dialog of many softwares, the DPI does impact the image dimensions when resampling the image. However, for a given pixel size, changing the DPI / PPI value has no effect on the display of the image nor the file size when creating a JPEG. Note the pixel dimensions and DPI values for the files below.

DPI Examples


Images that appear larger when zoomed to 100% simply have a pixel dimension that exceeds the size of the display. This zoom effect is the result of the pixel dimensions, not the number of pixels per inch. Take an image with dimension 5760x3840-pixels, say a JPEG straight from a 22MP camera. If you zoom the original image to 100% on your FHD1080 display, you're simply viewing an 1920x1080 crop of the entire 5760x3840 image. The DPI value has no impact on the image as displayed. DPI values of 1, 10, 72, 96, 300, etc all display exactly the same. The DPI / PPI value has no effect on the display of the image nor the file size when created as a JPEG as long as you don't resample the image.

Why recommend 2048px for 1920px wide screens?

Simplicity. The 2048px image will fill / nearly fill today's popular screen sizes, regardless of device type, including phones, HD TVs, tablets, Macs and PCs. The idea is to pick an easy standard to create a single image file with the widest possible display-uses on current equipment. The 2048 recommendation is based to Facebook's current maximum size. Whether you use Facebook or not, the 2048 recommendation is useful as a general practice for current technology.

Although this write-up considers "Full High-Definition" to be 1920x1080, the vendors use a range of screen sizes covering similar sizes from 1920x1050 to 2560x1600. Using 2048-pixels as a general-purpose size, you've covered all expected display-uses on current technology.

More details are provided below in topic Why 2048 is the recommended size? in the section "Reference Links".

Where are the file dimensions specified in my software?

Below are resize steps for popular edit programs to specify the long-side of the image and the JPEG image quality.

1. Lightroom

The Export Dialog controls the image parameters, where highlighted.

Lightroom Classic Export


2. PhotoShop / PhotoShop Elements

Depending on the version of PhotoShop, you use either menu commands = File / Export / Save for Web or simply File / Save for Web. This approach is different than the Resize command.

Save For Web


3. On1

Use the Resize module and Filter>Export to specify the pixel dimensions and JPEG quality.

On1 Resize and Export


4. Infraview

Infraview Resize



Reference Links

FAQ: What is PPI, DPI, XMP, EXIF, Etc.? A Brief Primer on Digital Photos

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-286738-1.html

Resize vs Resample

https://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/resizing-vs-resampling/

JPEG quality

https://sirv.com/help/resources/jpeg-quality-comparison/

Always Up-to-date Guide to Social Media Sizes

https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-image-sizes-guide/

Why 2048 is the recommended size?

https://photographylife.com/how-to-properly-resize-images-for-facebook
As DSLRs increase in MegaPixels (MP), larger high ... (show quote)


Thanks for the info CHG. Recently I have been arbitrarily sizing my UHH images to 2200 ppi on the long side, mainly so that the image will be noticeably larger when double clicked. I will change that to 2048 ppi on future posts.

Reply
May 1, 2021 12:56:46   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
jackm1943 wrote:
Thanks for the info CHG. Recently I have been arbitrarily sizing my UHH images to 2200 ppi on the long side, mainly so that the image will be noticeably larger when double clicked. I will change that to 2048 ppi on future posts.


Thank you jackm1943! We're beginning to see the 4K monitor grow into the population. That's a screen that is typically 3840 x 2160 pixels. You can see how things change, but at least this May Day 2021, 2048px remains a useful default standard for 1 output file to be used for all likely digital display devices, phone on up.

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2021 12:40:31   #
gener202002
 
Wow, this is really useful information and something I am not at all familiar with and have not used in the past. I was using the image/resize menu in photoshop and it was creating some problems. My new camera is taking photos at around 180m and in order to use them in hedgehog I have to resize them down to a 5 by 7. Everything else still leaves too many megapixels.

It will take a while to absorb this new information and resize correctly for uglyhedgehog and other things. And this way I can check and make sure it is correctly sRGB as well.

Thanks very much for this.

Gene

Reply
May 4, 2021 17:06:02   #
gener202002
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
As DSLRs increase in MegaPixels (MP), larger high quality prints can be made from the larger and larger files created by these cameras. However, these larger files make it more difficult for the photographer to electronically share their images due to these ever larger file sizes. Big is good, but bigger is not always better when working with digital images. This post explains the process of resizing digital images specifically for online display and file sharing.

The documented limit to a single attachment in UHH is 20MB (MegaByte). The high-quality JPEG files created by sensors such as the Nikon D850 now exceed the UHH limit where the photographer will need to use software tools to resize their image under the 20MB size limit. Sharing these images via email to family and friends requires even more action to create files that can be sent using popular email systems such as GMail, YahooMail, etc.

Consider the pixel / megapixel dimensions of a few popular models based on a 3x2 aspect ratio:

Nikon

D850 - 8,256 × 5,504 (45.4 MP)
D7200 - 6000 × 4000 (24 MP)

Canon

5DIV - 6720 × 4480 (30.1 MP)
80D - 6000 × 4000 (24 MP)

This post was developed with input from several UHH experts. The topic is organized with background on the pixel resolution of digital images and high-resolution wide-angle displays. We've collected instructions for popular photo-editing software to demonstrate how to resize digital images for electronic sharing. Special thank you's to members jerryc41, Gene51, Bob Yankle, TheDmann and Rongnongno for help in pulling this together.

Display resolution of your monitor

Many of us are now using "Full High-Definition" monitors. These "FHD1080" screens display at 1920x1080-pixels based on a 16x9 ratio. An image cropped to exactly 1920x1080px will exactly fill the dimensions of the FHD1080 screen when viewed at 100%. Your 1920x1080 image on your 16x9 screen will display "full screen" at a 100% zoom.

But, what about your 3x2 images? The 3x2 image is the traditional ratio of a frame of 35mm film in landscape orientation. As shown for the DSRL models above, 3x2 is the native ratio of images coming from the sensors in these cameras.

The screen resolution determines how the digital image is displayed. The FHD1080 screen will automatically scale a "large" image to fit the shorter side of the display. If you maintain the 3x2 ratio and use editing software to resize the long-side of your image to 2048-pixels, the "long-size" is wider than the width of the FHD1080 monitor (2048px > 1920px). The "short-side" is also greater than the height of the FHD1080 screen, (1365px > 1080px).

Your 3x2 image, when resized to 2048x1365, will be dynamically resized to 1620x1080 when displayed on your FHD1080. Your 3x2 image "fills" the vertical dimension with some unused margins on the left and right sides (1620px < 1920px). At this point the image is slightly less than 100% as the shorter-side (1365-pixels) has been resized to fit the screen height of 1080px. Clicking on the image to zoom to 100% will "expand" the image to fill the left and right margins of the 1920px display, using a 100% crop of size 1920x1080 from within the larger image having dimensions of 2048x1365.

The example below shows a 3x2 image on the left and a 16x9 crop of the same image on the right, both shown on a 1920x1080 Full High-Definition monitor.

Dynamic Resize Example


Sharing Images on photo sites such as Facebook, UHH, Flickr, etc

When you've completed your edits on an image from your Nikon D7200 and now want to share the image, this is where resizing the image comes into play. How you resize the image depends on the intended use. You can crop the image to 1920x1080 for use on "modern" FHD1080 displays (modern as in circa 2018). When you select a crop using a 16x9 ratio, your crop will maintain the width of your original 3x2 image, but the top and bottom will be cropped from the landscape-oriented image. See the portions of the image “lost” from above and below the cat in the examples above.

An easier approach is to simply maintain the original 3x2 ratio and specify a length on the long-side that matches (or slightly exceeds) the FHD1080 display that uses 1920-pixels on the long-side. The left version of the cat with the "margins" shows a 3x2 image that nearly fills the FHD1080 screen using an image sized 2048px on the long-side. Although you've "oversized" the image, the 2048-pixel long-side is much closer to the screen dimensions for people viewing your image than attempting to send them a file with dimensions 6000x4000-pixels. Unless zooming into a crop of the image, the 6000x4000 image displays like the cat above on the left exactly the same as a file at 2048x1365.

Digital images on image-sharing sites are intended for full-screen display on high-resolution monitors. This usage applies equally to UHH attachments as well as high-resolution uploads to Facebook, Flickr, 500px and similar social media and image sharing sites. Facebook now supports a maximum of 2048-pixels on the long-side. Using 2048-pixels on the long-side allows some "zoom" into the details when viewed at 100% on an FHD1080 monitor. Using 2048px creates a file around 1MB to 3MB when saved to disk, depending on the source camera, whether the image is cropped from the original, and assuming 100% JPEG quality.

Resizing your display files to a standard 2048-pixels on the long-side is intended for general use and for all crop ratios, 4x3, 1x1, 16:9, and so forth.

Sharing images via email

Continuing to use the 2048-pixel length on the long-side, one can begin to adjust the JPEG quality. The goal is to lower the JPEG quality to reduce the file size as an attachment without lowering the quality of the image when viewed by the email recipients. Your friends / family using FHD1080 displays should receive an image that fills (or nearly fills) their screen when viewed.

Sharing a single image as a 1.5MB attachment should not cause undo delay for the email sender nor receiver. But, if you have multiple files to share, you should lower the JPEG quality to reduce the file size. Differences in the quality values from 99% to 80% typically cannot be seen by the human eye when displayed full-screen on an FHD1080 screen. The lower the quality value, the more compression is applied to the JPEG image creating a much smaller file. Below 80% one can begin to see degradation of the image when viewed full-screen on an FHD1080 display.

Creating images for other digital uses

Website design seeks to maximize the viewing experience for the site. Larger images render slower. The page / site Design Lead will specify the exact dimensions and quality settings for images on their site.

If you're interested in image-size recommendations for popular social media sites, visit Always Up-to-date Guide to Social Media Sizes using the link below in the section "Reference Links".

Is 80% Quality the best for all software?

The How-To samples, below, specify a common 80% quality. However, the compression engine specific to each software may differ from the results of others. Consider adjusting the quality value if your results differ when viewed full-screen on your display screen. Consider 5% changes in the JPEG Quality such as 85% or 90% or 95% until you determine the value best for your needs. You might also continue to lower the quality below 80%, again, as needed.

Impact of changes to JPEG Quality


What are DPI / PPI?

Q: Does DPI / PPI affect the image display?
ANS: No

DPI - Dots Per Inch
PPI - Pixels Per Inch

A digital image has only a pixel dimension. The image file may report a DPI value of 72 / 96 / 250 / 300 / etc when the file properties are viewed from the operating system. The DPI value has no impact on how the file is displayed electronically. In the ReSize dialog of many softwares, the DPI does impact the image dimensions when resampling the image. However, for a given pixel size, changing the DPI / PPI value has no effect on the display of the image nor the file size when creating a JPEG. Note the pixel dimensions and DPI values for the files below.

DPI Examples


Images that appear larger when zoomed to 100% simply have a pixel dimension that exceeds the size of the display. This zoom effect is the result of the pixel dimensions, not the number of pixels per inch. Take an image with dimension 5760x3840-pixels, say a JPEG straight from a 22MP camera. If you zoom the original image to 100% on your FHD1080 display, you're simply viewing an 1920x1080 crop of the entire 5760x3840 image. The DPI value has no impact on the image as displayed. DPI values of 1, 10, 72, 96, 300, etc all display exactly the same. The DPI / PPI value has no effect on the display of the image nor the file size when created as a JPEG as long as you don't resample the image.

Why recommend 2048px for 1920px wide screens?

Simplicity. The 2048px image will fill / nearly fill today's popular screen sizes, regardless of device type, including phones, HD TVs, tablets, Macs and PCs. The idea is to pick an easy standard to create a single image file with the widest possible display-uses on current equipment. The 2048 recommendation is based to Facebook's current maximum size. Whether you use Facebook or not, the 2048 recommendation is useful as a general practice for current technology.

Although this write-up considers "Full High-Definition" to be 1920x1080, the vendors use a range of screen sizes covering similar sizes from 1920x1050 to 2560x1600. Using 2048-pixels as a general-purpose size, you've covered all expected display-uses on current technology.

More details are provided below in topic Why 2048 is the recommended size? in the section "Reference Links".

Where are the file dimensions specified in my software?

Below are resize steps for popular edit programs to specify the long-side of the image and the JPEG image quality.

1. Lightroom

The Export Dialog controls the image parameters, where highlighted.

Lightroom Classic Export


2. PhotoShop / PhotoShop Elements

Depending on the version of PhotoShop, you use either menu commands = File / Export / Save for Web or simply File / Save for Web. This approach is different than the Resize command.

Save For Web


3. On1

Use the Resize module and Filter>Export to specify the pixel dimensions and JPEG quality.

On1 Resize and Export


4. Infraview

Infraview Resize



Reference Links

FAQ: What is PPI, DPI, XMP, EXIF, Etc.? A Brief Primer on Digital Photos

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-286738-1.html

Resize vs Resample

https://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/resizing-vs-resampling/

JPEG quality

https://sirv.com/help/resources/jpeg-quality-comparison/

Always Up-to-date Guide to Social Media Sizes

https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-image-sizes-guide/

Why 2048 is the recommended size?

https://photographylife.com/how-to-properly-resize-images-for-facebook
As DSLRs increase in MegaPixels (MP), larger high ... (show quote)



Canon

When I looked in file room under the color space, it did say sRGB. So I am still a little confused. Also, this picture was accepted by stock agencies, so that confuses me also.

Thanks, Gener

Reply
May 22, 2021 16:25:34   #
no12mo
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
As DSLRs increase in MegaPixels (MP), larger high quality prints can be made from the larger and larger files created by these cameras. However, these larger files make it more difficult for the photographer to electronically share their images due to these ever larger file sizes. Big is good, but bigger is not always better when working with digital images. This post explains the process of resizing digital images specifically for online display and file sharing.

The documented limit to a single attachment in UHH is 20MB (MegaByte). The high-quality JPEG files created by sensors such as the Nikon D850 now exceed the UHH limit where the photographer will need to use software tools to resize their image under the 20MB size limit. Sharing these images via email to family and friends requires even more action to create files that can be sent using popular email systems such as GMail, YahooMail, etc.

Consider the pixel / megapixel dimensions of a few popular models based on a 3x2 aspect ratio:

Nikon

D850 - 8,256 × 5,504 (45.4 MP)
D7200 - 6000 × 4000 (24 MP)

Canon

5DIV - 6720 × 4480 (30.1 MP)
80D - 6000 × 4000 (24 MP)

This post was developed with input from several UHH experts. The topic is organized with background on the pixel resolution of digital images and high-resolution wide-angle displays. We've collected instructions for popular photo-editing software to demonstrate how to resize digital images for electronic sharing. Special thank you's to members jerryc41, Gene51, Bob Yankle, TheDmann and Rongnongno for help in pulling this together.

Display resolution of your monitor

Many of us are now using "Full High-Definition" monitors. These "FHD1080" screens display at 1920x1080-pixels based on a 16x9 ratio. An image cropped to exactly 1920x1080px will exactly fill the dimensions of the FHD1080 screen when viewed at 100%. Your 1920x1080 image on your 16x9 screen will display "full screen" at a 100% zoom.

But, what about your 3x2 images? The 3x2 image is the traditional ratio of a frame of 35mm film in landscape orientation. As shown for the DSRL models above, 3x2 is the native ratio of images coming from the sensors in these cameras.

The screen resolution determines how the digital image is displayed. The FHD1080 screen will automatically scale a "large" image to fit the shorter side of the display. If you maintain the 3x2 ratio and use editing software to resize the long-side of your image to 2048-pixels, the "long-size" is wider than the width of the FHD1080 monitor (2048px > 1920px). The "short-side" is also greater than the height of the FHD1080 screen, (1365px > 1080px).

Your 3x2 image, when resized to 2048x1365, will be dynamically resized to 1620x1080 when displayed on your FHD1080. Your 3x2 image "fills" the vertical dimension with some unused margins on the left and right sides (1620px < 1920px). At this point the image is slightly less than 100% as the shorter-side (1365-pixels) has been resized to fit the screen height of 1080px. Clicking on the image to zoom to 100% will "expand" the image to fill the left and right margins of the 1920px display, using a 100% crop of size 1920x1080 from within the larger image having dimensions of 2048x1365.

The example below shows a 3x2 image on the left and a 16x9 crop of the same image on the right, both shown on a 1920x1080 Full High-Definition monitor.

Dynamic Resize Example


Sharing Images on photo sites such as Facebook, UHH, Flickr, etc

When you've completed your edits on an image from your Nikon D7200 and now want to share the image, this is where resizing the image comes into play. How you resize the image depends on the intended use. You can crop the image to 1920x1080 for use on "modern" FHD1080 displays (modern as in circa 2018). When you select a crop using a 16x9 ratio, your crop will maintain the width of your original 3x2 image, but the top and bottom will be cropped from the landscape-oriented image. See the portions of the image “lost” from above and below the cat in the examples above.

An easier approach is to simply maintain the original 3x2 ratio and specify a length on the long-side that matches (or slightly exceeds) the FHD1080 display that uses 1920-pixels on the long-side. The left version of the cat with the "margins" shows a 3x2 image that nearly fills the FHD1080 screen using an image sized 2048px on the long-side. Although you've "oversized" the image, the 2048-pixel long-side is much closer to the screen dimensions for people viewing your image than attempting to send them a file with dimensions 6000x4000-pixels. Unless zooming into a crop of the image, the 6000x4000 image displays like the cat above on the left exactly the same as a file at 2048x1365.

Digital images on image-sharing sites are intended for full-screen display on high-resolution monitors. This usage applies equally to UHH attachments as well as high-resolution uploads to Facebook, Flickr, 500px and similar social media and image sharing sites. Facebook now supports a maximum of 2048-pixels on the long-side. Using 2048-pixels on the long-side allows some "zoom" into the details when viewed at 100% on an FHD1080 monitor. Using 2048px creates a file around 1MB to 3MB when saved to disk, depending on the source camera, whether the image is cropped from the original, and assuming 100% JPEG quality.

Resizing your display files to a standard 2048-pixels on the long-side is intended for general use and for all crop ratios, 4x3, 1x1, 16:9, and so forth.

Sharing images via email

Continuing to use the 2048-pixel length on the long-side, one can begin to adjust the JPEG quality. The goal is to lower the JPEG quality to reduce the file size as an attachment without lowering the quality of the image when viewed by the email recipients. Your friends / family using FHD1080 displays should receive an image that fills (or nearly fills) their screen when viewed.

Sharing a single image as a 1.5MB attachment should not cause undo delay for the email sender nor receiver. But, if you have multiple files to share, you should lower the JPEG quality to reduce the file size. Differences in the quality values from 99% to 80% typically cannot be seen by the human eye when displayed full-screen on an FHD1080 screen. The lower the quality value, the more compression is applied to the JPEG image creating a much smaller file. Below 80% one can begin to see degradation of the image when viewed full-screen on an FHD1080 display.

Creating images for other digital uses

Website design seeks to maximize the viewing experience for the site. Larger images render slower. The page / site Design Lead will specify the exact dimensions and quality settings for images on their site.

If you're interested in image-size recommendations for popular social media sites, visit Always Up-to-date Guide to Social Media Sizes using the link below in the section "Reference Links".

Is 80% Quality the best for all software?

The How-To samples, below, specify a common 80% quality. However, the compression engine specific to each software may differ from the results of others. Consider adjusting the quality value if your results differ when viewed full-screen on your display screen. Consider 5% changes in the JPEG Quality such as 85% or 90% or 95% until you determine the value best for your needs. You might also continue to lower the quality below 80%, again, as needed.

Impact of changes to JPEG Quality


What are DPI / PPI?

Q: Does DPI / PPI affect the image display?
ANS: No

DPI - Dots Per Inch
PPI - Pixels Per Inch

A digital image has only a pixel dimension. The image file may report a DPI value of 72 / 96 / 250 / 300 / etc when the file properties are viewed from the operating system. The DPI value has no impact on how the file is displayed electronically. In the ReSize dialog of many softwares, the DPI does impact the image dimensions when resampling the image. However, for a given pixel size, changing the DPI / PPI value has no effect on the display of the image nor the file size when creating a JPEG. Note the pixel dimensions and DPI values for the files below.

DPI Examples


Images that appear larger when zoomed to 100% simply have a pixel dimension that exceeds the size of the display. This zoom effect is the result of the pixel dimensions, not the number of pixels per inch. Take an image with dimension 5760x3840-pixels, say a JPEG straight from a 22MP camera. If you zoom the original image to 100% on your FHD1080 display, you're simply viewing an 1920x1080 crop of the entire 5760x3840 image. The DPI value has no impact on the image as displayed. DPI values of 1, 10, 72, 96, 300, etc all display exactly the same. The DPI / PPI value has no effect on the display of the image nor the file size when created as a JPEG as long as you don't resample the image.

Why recommend 2048px for 1920px wide screens?

Simplicity. The 2048px image will fill / nearly fill today's popular screen sizes, regardless of device type, including phones, HD TVs, tablets, Macs and PCs. The idea is to pick an easy standard to create a single image file with the widest possible display-uses on current equipment. The 2048 recommendation is based to Facebook's current maximum size. Whether you use Facebook or not, the 2048 recommendation is useful as a general practice for current technology.

Although this write-up considers "Full High-Definition" to be 1920x1080, the vendors use a range of screen sizes covering similar sizes from 1920x1050 to 2560x1600. Using 2048-pixels as a general-purpose size, you've covered all expected display-uses on current technology.

More details are provided below in topic Why 2048 is the recommended size? in the section "Reference Links".

Where are the file dimensions specified in my software?

Below are resize steps for popular edit programs to specify the long-side of the image and the JPEG image quality.

1. Lightroom

The Export Dialog controls the image parameters, where highlighted.

Lightroom Classic Export


2. PhotoShop / PhotoShop Elements

Depending on the version of PhotoShop, you use either menu commands = File / Export / Save for Web or simply File / Save for Web. This approach is different than the Resize command.

Save For Web


3. On1

Use the Resize module and Filter>Export to specify the pixel dimensions and JPEG quality.

On1 Resize and Export


4. Infraview

Infraview Resize



Reference Links

FAQ: What is PPI, DPI, XMP, EXIF, Etc.? A Brief Primer on Digital Photos

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-286738-1.html

Resize vs Resample

https://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/resizing-vs-resampling/

JPEG quality

https://sirv.com/help/resources/jpeg-quality-comparison/

Always Up-to-date Guide to Social Media Sizes

https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-image-sizes-guide/

Why 2048 is the recommended size?

https://photographylife.com/how-to-properly-resize-images-for-facebook
As DSLRs increase in MegaPixels (MP), larger high ... (show quote)


Then there is FastStone where you can tweak the compression to as much as 10% without an appreciable loss of quality. First you decide what pixal size you want and then you tweak with the compression. As long as you are working with JPGs.

Nice exhaustive presentation.

Reply
Jun 26, 2021 15:17:55   #
danniel Loc: North Port, Florida
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Wes, I'd suggest the following:

1. Create a 2048px export at 100% quality based on the settings / examples in this UHH post creating a JPEG file.

2. Test the various email option of the same image, just email to yourself. Detach the files from the emails and compare to the 2048px JPEG. Use the 'file properties' from an OS window looking at the files to see the pixel resolution and / or make notes about the JPEG quality.

3. You should be able to determine the differences, both visually and from the pixel resolution. Open a new thread (or PM me directly) if you are unsure of the technical properties to be reviewed.

4. When you arrive to the best mix of export parameters to your needs, create your own custom Export preset. You can even do this for an Email export. Again, we can discussed the detailed process of 'how' via a 1 on 1 discussion, if needed.
Wes, I'd suggest the following: br br 1. Create a... (show quote)


actually my question was more in the line of how does UHH downsize/resample images you upload ? How do I maintain as much IQ considering that process ?

You may have answered that question in all that, but it would have gone over my head lol, sorry.

I was under the impression the dimension limit was 1400 px width.

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2021 16:07:55   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Many thanks for a great and useful reference!

Reply
Jun 26, 2021 18:39:49   #
danniel Loc: North Port, Florida
 
this will take me some time to even read, no less comprehend lol, but I am one of the less knowledgeable blokes here
for sure. I have copied it so I will have it offline.
The more I try, the more I will succeed.

Reply
Jun 26, 2021 19:13:29   #
no12mo
 
danniel wrote:
actually my question was more in the line of how does UHH downsize/resample images you upload ? How do I maintain as much IQ considering that process ?

You may have answered that question in all that, but it would have gone over my head lol, sorry.

I was under the impression the dimension limit was 1400 px width.


I am not aware of a 1400 pixel limit. There may be a file size limit but I have already addressed that subject in this thread. Again, FastStone and other utilities can compress a JPG down to as much as one tenth the original file size without an appreciable reduction in quality. For practicality the image only needs to fill the average serious photographer's monitor screen unless the purpose of the upload is to draw attention to part of a larger image.

Reply
Jun 26, 2021 19:17:46   #
danniel Loc: North Port, Florida
 
Well then I will have to review that software I just use Photoshop and keep it as high as possible I haven't even looked at the file size of my image but yes that's certainly something to look into which I will do later tonight I'm working off my phone right now because I'm obviously not sitting up there's a lot of downtime with this condition and sitting is not one of the things I'm not allowed to do freely LOL

But I certainly do appreciate your knowledge and not only to help you giving me but all the help you've given everyone else it surprised me today that I think this last post I made had inspired someone to get out there tubes which I'm thrilled about a good macro shots and find what a what a joy it is so back when I was at the rookery I was teaching people how to be successful photographing birds in flight and I ended up with a little Entourage people following me around but they quickly got bored of doing Virgin flight I never get bored of photographing anything I didn't think I could ever get bored to go to dropping cricket spiders albatross osprey airplanes it wouldn't make a difference I just love photographing

And please forgive the horrible apparent run on sentences with no punctuation I'm speaking to the phone and it's doing the typing and it's frequently wrong and I can't really get the little cursor to go back where I need to make marks so it all looks like one big running on settings three paragraphs long but it's really not intended that way :-)

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2021 19:19:18   #
no12mo
 
You can probably do the compression of JPGs with Photoshop. I just don't know the program

Reply
Jun 26, 2021 20:07:08   #
danniel Loc: North Port, Florida
 
I Photoshop is usually what I use but it's like Photoshop 6 and I'm sure they've made improvements in JPay compression since then and the phone is not very big I mean they're not very small sorry usually one and a half to two and a half I'm not trimmed down I'd have to look I really haven't paid much attention of light but yeah I like I said I'm going to go through the the posting requirements and actually make sure I haven't got this screwed up with another place LOL

Reply
Jun 27, 2021 07:09:14   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Dannie, no12mo - I read two ideas in the recent June 26 questions. First, UHH doesn't do anything to your file attachment regarding the actual attachment. The relevant issue here is the thumbnail width at 800 pixel wide. An image at 800px or less wide displays as-is within the UHH page. An image wider than 800px is compressed as a thumbnail as displayed within the UHH page. When the attached file is opened and displayed (in another browser page or downloaded and displayed locally), the file is the same / unchanged file as the community member uploaded and stored as an attachment.

The 'limit' to UHH attachments is 20MB - megabytes. There is no pixel size limit as long as you can hold the file size under 20MB. Remember there is no 1 to 1 relationship of pixels to bytes in a JPEG file.

The idea presented in the topic of this post is your UHH community members will 'see' your file attachment on screens that range from 1920x1080 (2.1MP) to 3840x2160 (8.1MP), where that larger size is an ultra modern "4K" TV or video monitor. That 4K resolution, aka UHDTV, is still smaller than your circa 2006 10MP Canon Rebel Xti or the 10MP Nikon D80 from the same year (3872×2592).

When you resize your digital image to 2048x1365 (2.8MP), you're filling or nearly filling every most every possible target screen in the community, as well as easily holding the file size on the 20MB file size limit.

Reply
Jun 27, 2021 14:27:03   #
danniel Loc: North Port, Florida
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Dannie, no12mo - I read two ideas in the recent June 26 questions. First, UHH doesn't do anything to your file attachment regarding the actual attachment. The relevant issue here is the thumbnail width at 800 pixel wide. An image at 800px or less wide displays as-is within the UHH page. An image wider than 800px is compressed as a thumbnail as displayed within the UHH page. When the attached file is opened and displayed (in another browser page or downloaded and displayed locally), the file is the same / unchanged file as the community member uploaded and stored as an attachment.

The 'limit' to UHH attachments is 20MB - megabytes. There is no pixel size limit as long as you can hold the file size under 20MB. Remember there is no 1 to 1 relationship of pixels to bytes in a JPEG file.

The idea presented in the topic of this post is your UHH community members will 'see' your file attachment on screens that range from 1920x1080 (2.1MP) to 3840x2160 (8.1MP), where that larger size is an ultra modern "4K" TV or video monitor. That 4K resolution, aka UHDTV, is still smaller than your circa 2006 10MP Canon Rebel Xti or the 10MP Nikon D80 from the same year (3872×2592).

When you resize your digital image to 2048x1365 (2.8MP), you're filling or nearly filling every most every possible target screen in the community, as well as easily holding the file size on the 20MB file size limit.
b Dannie, no12mo - /b I read two ideas in the re... (show quote)


Much appreciated information. I do not know why I thought there was a limit on dimension.
I am sure what I am seeing in the difference in IQ of the thumbnail vs the original. Now I know. Thanks.
I do post on another forum from time to time and I know they have limits, so perhaps I mixed them up.
I tried changing my IQ when saving today, from a 12, the highest, to 11, and saw no difference other than file size.
This will save me some disk space as I have over 72k jpg files, but I always save the Raw anyway.

I am still trying to find the best Fstop for this lens. The camera says its F4, but I think F8.
I need to set up a proper test.

I find with the tubes I do loose depth, so sometimes stacking may be required more often to obtain what I want.
CS6 seems to do Ok for stacking so far.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Advice from the Pros
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.