Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sharp, small, cheap telephoto for Nikon FX
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 18, 2017 12:27:25   #
Pilot 6 Loc: Eugene, OR
 
Impossible? Perhaps not. A 55-200 4.0/5.6 GII VR kit lens (DX), on my D750 is just (well, almost) such a combination. With image area on 1.5 (DX) crop factor and field of view of 300mm there is no vignetting as expected. But on 1.2 crop factor, there still is no vignetting but with a slight darkening in the corners, and an effective FOV of 240mm. On FX, full frame, there is vignetting out to about 110mm. The rest of the way to 200mm is clear. Not bad for a kit lens IMHO!

Comments?

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 12:34:02   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Pretty much standard operating procedure for most APS lenses (DX)....

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 12:41:19   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
A good used AF-S 70-300mm VR lens built for an FX camera can be bought for $300. If you can't afford an FX lens then your lens will work in a pinch, no other reason to use the lens mentioned.....

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2017 12:53:21   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
You can always go Nikon manual Vintage zoom lenses. Or, you could go with a full frame format, aftermarket lens.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 13:00:27   #
Pilot 6 Loc: Eugene, OR
 
martinfisherphoto wrote:
A good used AF-S 70-300mm VR lens built for an FX camera can be bought for $300. If you can't afford an FX lens then your lens will work in a pinch, no other reason to use the lens mentioned.....


There is another reason:SMALL (read, LIGHT). When you get older, You'll understand.
Bob

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 13:07:46   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
UMMMMMM then why buy a Full Frame Camera, they tend to be larger and weigh more, especially when FX lens applied. Not a Good argument.....
Pilot 6 wrote:
There is another reason:SMALL (read, LIGHT). When you get older, You'll understand.
Bob

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 13:16:16   #
BebuLamar
 
It's a very poor combination. You have fewer megapixels than on a less expensive DX camera like the D7200.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2017 13:42:41   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Pilot 6 wrote:
Impossible? Perhaps not. A 55-200 4.0/5.6 GII VR kit lens (DX), on my D750 is just (well, almost) such a combination. With image area on 1.5 (DX) crop factor and field of view of 300mm there is no vignetting as expected. But on 1.2 crop factor, there still is no vignetting but with a slight darkening in the corners, and an effective FOV of 240mm. On FX, full frame, there is vignetting out to about 110mm. The rest of the way to 200mm is clear. Not bad for a kit lens IMHO!

Comments?


Is using a DX lens any different that using the crop tool in post processing? Not really. But the edges and corners of a DX lens will be less than crisp compared to a FX lens, even on a 1.2 crop.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 14:00:01   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
BebuLamar wrote:
It's a very poor combination. You have fewer megapixels than on a less expensive DX camera like the D7200.


But the pixels are usually a little larger, therefore less noise.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 14:03:55   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Pilot 6 wrote:
Impossible? Perhaps not. A 55-200 4.0/5.6 GII VR kit lens (DX), on my D750 is just (well, almost) such a combination. With image area on 1.5 (DX) crop factor and field of view of 300mm there is no vignetting as expected. But on 1.2 crop factor, there still is no vignetting but with a slight darkening in the corners, and an effective FOV of 240mm. On FX, full frame, there is vignetting out to about 110mm. The rest of the way to 200mm is clear. Not bad for a kit lens IMHO!

Comments?


Actually the mid 80s 75-150 mm f/3.5 Nikon Series E Zoom is quite good, if you don't mind manual focus. But being a one ring zoom-focus lens makes it a lot faster to use than one would think. . . Just sayin'

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 15:26:00   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
Two suggestion that can be found on eBay. 24 -80 mm that came on Nikon auto focus film cameras. It's sharp, light, and cheap. $20 -$35. 70 - 210 mm f/4 Nikon film camera zoom. Only draw back it is a little heavy. The run around $200. - dave

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2017 15:39:50   #
Pilot 6 Loc: Eugene, OR
 
martinfisherphoto wrote:
UMMMMMM then why buy a Full Frame Camera, they tend to be larger and weigh more, especially when FX lens applied. Not a Good argument.....

It's not an argument---rather a position. The photography that interests me is best captured in the middlle range: roughly 24-180mm and doesn't involve sports or birds. I have excellent primes in this range that, at 91, I'm still able to heft around, and that still relate to many years of film---no crop-censor calculating: a 35 is a 35 not a 52.5, etc.

Reply
Nov 19, 2017 06:46:10   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Pilot 6 wrote:
Impossible? Perhaps not. A 55-200 4.0/5.6 GII VR kit lens (DX), on my D750 is just (well, almost) such a combination. With image area on 1.5 (DX) crop factor and field of view of 300mm there is no vignetting as expected. But on 1.2 crop factor, there still is no vignetting but with a slight darkening in the corners, and an effective FOV of 240mm. On FX, full frame, there is vignetting out to about 110mm. The rest of the way to 200mm is clear. Not bad for a kit lens IMHO!

Comments?




https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-55-200mm-4-5-6G-Vibration-Reduction/dp/B000O161X0

Reply
Nov 19, 2017 09:08:05   #
Jesterman
 
Nikon 28-300 is within reason

Reply
Nov 19, 2017 10:17:17   #
BebuLamar
 
An old 200mm f/4 AI would give the same focal length and reasonable sharp and cheap.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.