Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon Upgrade
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Nov 14, 2017 12:05:23   #
skornfeld
 
Wingpilot wrote:
There might be some terrific Black Friday sales, and often the closer it gets to Christmas, deals start showing up. You might not need to wait as long as you think to pick up a D810.


YEA!!!

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 18:19:01   #
ecurb1105
 
petercbrandt wrote:
Flash changes the mood of the environment, even if you bounce light. Flash ruins the idea of shooting available light.


I disagree, Flash is just another light you have available to you.

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 18:33:10   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
skornfeld wrote:
I've had a 7200 for about 2 years and think I've improved quite a bit during that time. I am an obsessed amateur and retired so I have time to shoot. I shoot mainly landscape and grandkids. Lately I've become enamored with daytime black and white landscape but think I'm somewhat restricted with the dynamic range and also the low light performance of interior grandkids photos. Usually handheld no flash since they don't pose or stay still. Would I notice a difference with the 810? I already have the nikon 24-70 and 70-200, both 2.8's so I already have fx lenses but would have to buy a new 50.
I've had a 7200 for about 2 years and think I've i... (show quote)


I think you would be very happy with the D810. But if you already have a 24-70 why would you need to buy a new 50? Isn't 50 represented with the 24-70? Or are you just wanting a 50mm for a prime lens?

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2017 18:58:37   #
skornfeld
 
dennis2146 wrote:
I think you would be very happy with the D810. But if you already have a 24-70 why would you need to buy a new 50? Isn't 50 represented with the 24-70? Or are you just wanting a 50mm for a prime lens?

Dennis


I like having the prime 50 even though the zoom covers it. The 1.8 comes in handy for birthday cakes and Xmas trees etc

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 18:59:47   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
skornfeld wrote:
I like having the prime 50 even though the zoom covers it. The 1.8 comes in handy for birthday cakes and Xmas trees etc


Thanks. I was just curious.

Dennis

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 20:11:45   #
Rdhalste
 
orrie smith wrote:
In my opinion, the d810 or d850 would both be excellent choices. That said, I feel the d750 would fit your needs just as well, and at a lower cost. The higher mp's of the d810 is great if you are printing larger that 8x10 photos, but is not necessary for normal printing. The d750 is very similar in it's layout to the d7200, so a smaller learning curve. I know that a lot of users will disagree with my opinion, but I have owned the d750 for a while now and find the photos to be excellent and the camera to be sturdy and reliable. Good luck with whichever camera you choose.
In my opinion, the d810 or d850 would both be exce... (show quote)


Don't forget the D800 used. Some can be found that are still like new for substantially less than a new D850. Look used cameras over carefully. There are gems, but some were used as work horses.
I use the D800 as my primary camera, but I find an old D300 works just fine indoors with available light. If you make prints no larger than 8 X 10 you should be able to do "some" cropping.
As has already been said, if your 7200 has a problem with available light, just up the ASA/ISO to what ever proves to work. Unlike faster films, I've never noticed a degradation when going faster with digital, although I've not gone to extremes.

Having said that, the full frame sensors will let you do a lot of cropping, but those cameras are noticeably heavier than those with DX sensors. When on the road, or storm chasing I use the DX format only because it weighs less.
For me, weight is a problem as I've been relegated to one hand shooting and the D800 gets heavier quickly.

Reply
Nov 14, 2017 20:46:04   #
skornfeld
 
Rdhalste wrote:
Don't forget the D800 used. Some can be found that are still like new for substantially less than a new D850. Look used cameras over carefully. There are gems, but some were used as work horses.
I use the D800 as my primary camera, but I find an old D300 works just fine indoors with available light. If you make prints no larger than 8 X 10 you should be able to do "some" cropping.
As has already been said, if your 7200 has a problem with available light, just up the ASA/ISO to what ever proves to work. Unlike faster films, I've never noticed a degradation when going faster with digital, although I've not gone to extremes.

Having said that, the full frame sensors will let you do a lot of cropping, but those cameras are noticeably heavier than those with DX sensors. When on the road, or storm chasing I use the DX format only because it weighs less.
For me, weight is a problem as I've been relegated to one hand shooting and the D800 gets heavier quickly.
Don't forget the D800 used. Some can be found tha... (show quote)


Thank you for the input - I don't feel the weight will be an issue at this point and hopefully by that time nikon will have come out with a good FF mirrorless that can use these lenses.

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2017 21:13:47   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
skornfeld wrote:
Thank you for the input - I don't feel the weight will be an issue at this point and hopefully by that time nikon will have come out with a good FF mirrorless that can use these lenses.


Nikon's proposed mirrorless camera's will not except the current Nikon DSLR lenses. An adapter will have to be used, if someone makes one for it.

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 12:28:38   #
scaltony
 
I agree with the above. I have a D7100 and a D750 and the size, layout_weight are almost identical. Unless you are shooting murals or semi truck ads the D750 would fit your needs at a much lower cost.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.