Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
HDR Photography -- Before and After
HDR photos
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 10, 2017 00:50:42   #
Hank Radt
 
Interesting photos here: https://gurushots.com/article/hdr-gets-a-bad-rap-these-28-images-might-change-your-mind

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 01:24:42   #
neco Loc: Western Colorado Mountains
 
Has anyone joined this organization?

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 05:19:07   #
tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio
 
Very inspirational.

Reply
 
 
Nov 10, 2017 06:51:31   #
Jim-Pops Loc: Granbury, Texas
 
Has me wanting to go out and find some old vacant buildings.

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 07:43:42   #
deer2ker Loc: Nashville, TN
 
These pics are what I love about HDR

Reply
Nov 11, 2017 08:37:15   #
papa Loc: Rio Dell, CA
 
In all the frames on the link I notice that HDR has brought extreme light and shadow (dynamic range) into view without flattening; retaining contrast and exposing detail that brings life to them. HDR gives the photographer a tool to use when the dynamic range is outside the ability of the camera sensor that the photographer wants to record. Neophytes shooting anything and everything with HDR end up with lifeless crap and based on that no wonder there's hubbub. Maybe it's best not to drive a nail with a Crescent wrench.

Reply
Nov 11, 2017 10:04:36   #
Wanderer2 Loc: Colorado Rocky Mountains
 
papa wrote:
In all the frames on the link I notice that HDR has brought extreme light and shadow (dynamic range) into view without flattening; retaining contrast and exposing detail that brings life to them. HDR gives the photographer a tool to use when the dynamic range is outside the ability of the camera sensor that the photographer wants to record. Neophytes shooting anything and everything with HDR end up with lifeless crap and based on that no wonder there's hubbub. Maybe it's best not to drive a nail with a Crescent wrench.
In all the frames on the link I notice that HDR ha... (show quote)


Very well stated!

Reply
 
 
Nov 11, 2017 15:10:23   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 


Thanks for posting to that site. Those were nicely done not over cooked, like some I’ve seen in the past.

Reply
Nov 11, 2017 16:04:09   #
Jim-Pops Loc: Granbury, Texas
 
RichardSM wrote:
Thanks for posting to that site. Those were nicely done not over cooked, like some I’ve seen in the past.


Like MANY I've seen in the past.

Reply
Nov 12, 2017 05:00:40   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
papa wrote:
In all the frames on the link I notice that HDR has brought extreme light and shadow (dynamic range) into view without flattening; retaining contrast and exposing detail that brings life to them. HDR gives the photographer a tool to use when the dynamic range is outside the ability of the camera sensor that the photographer wants to record. Neophytes shooting anything and everything with HDR end up with lifeless crap and based on that no wonder there's hubbub. Maybe it's best not to drive a nail with a Crescent wrench.
In all the frames on the link I notice that HDR ha... (show quote)


"That the photographer wants to record" does not always make for pleasing or natural pictures, although likely to be more informative. Those street scenes do not, for me look natural. They appear basked in light that just is not there and is not believable. I would have preferred to see a few deep shadows, and other shadows perhaps not so deep, more in keeping with an ill-lit street after dark.

Reply
Nov 17, 2017 23:11:10   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
Incredibly beautiful images. This is what HDR is supposed to be. Depth of range only to be gotten through HDR. If only I could do that!

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2017 23:26:35   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
papa wrote:
Maybe it's best not to drive a nail with a Crescent wrench.


Or a 15lb sledge hammer. Most every HDR image I see is so over-processed it's just plain ugly. Not worth a second look. The images on this link are something we all should shoot for.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 03:27:54   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
10MPlayer wrote:
Incredibly beautiful images. This is what HDR is supposed to be. Depth of range only to be gotten through HDR. If only I could do that!


Let us, for a moment, pretend that the dynamic range of our cameras was unlimited. Would we want to make photos taken at night or late evening as bright as day? or would we rather show the gentle light of evening, or the beautiful silver light of a full moon, or the welcoming light of a new dawn? or the light of an approaching storm? or even the inky black shadows cast by a harsh sun, which disappear when you are in that shadow, and the sunlight itself is then blinding?
This thirst for detail at all costs seperates the photographer from the artist - "artists licence" has become "photographers licence" - in other words recording what we cannot see rather than what we do see.

Reply
Nov 18, 2017 20:25:12   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
Delderby wrote:
Let us, for a moment, pretend that the dynamic range of our cameras was unlimited. Would we want to make photos taken at night or late evening as bright as day? or would we rather show the gentle light of evening, or the beautiful silver light of a full moon, or the welcoming light of a new dawn? or the light of an approaching storm? or even the inky black shadows cast by a harsh sun, which disappear when you are in that shadow, and the sunlight itself is then blinding?
This thirst for detail at all costs seperates the photographer from the artist - "artists licence" has become "photographers licence" - in other words recording what we cannot see rather than what we do see.
Let us, for a moment, pretend that the dynamic ran... (show quote)


Agreed. I like my images to look like real life. But there is a place for HDR. It's not realistic, more painterly to me, but some of the images are amazing beautiful. It has its place just like black and white has its place. Or abstract or street. They all have a place they are all photography.

Reply
Nov 19, 2017 03:45:37   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
10MPlayer wrote:
Agreed. I like my images to look like real life. But there is a place for HDR. It's not realistic, more painterly to me, but some of the images are amazing beautiful. It has its place just like black and white has its place. Or abstract or street. They all have a place they are all photography.


I guess HDR as a tool can too easily be overdone - like other tools - sharpeners, saturation, contrast. The Photographers's pics were not overdone in the true sense, and I have resorted to faux HDR myself on occasion. What the photographers achieved was, in fact, pretty clever. But as you say - painterly.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
HDR Photography -- Before and After
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.