Upgrade from D7100 to D750 or D500?
May 31, 2017 08:46:10 #
May 31, 2017 09:00:53 #
GrandmaG wrote:
Good to know. I was planning to get the body only; but, I was wondering if the 16-80mm f/2.8-4 would be better than the 24-70mm f/2.8 that I already own because the 16-80 is a DX lens.
Thoughts anyone?
Thoughts anyone?
If you stay with DX (and you have no reason not to), sell the 24-70 and get a Sigma or Tamron 17-50 2.8. You be able to get wider and have cash left over for a couple of nice primes! I have a D500 and D7200. Both are great, depending on what I'm shooting. Yes, the D500 is mostly used for sports, but that tilt screen sure helps my old knees for landscapes. I think the new D7500 could fit the bill for what you want to do if you find the D500 too much. Personally, I'm considering selling or trading the D7200 for a used D800e for one reason, night skies. But then I'll have to get new glass too! Cha-ching! Argh!
May 31, 2017 09:13:53 #
I used my 50MM f1.8 for our granddaughter's baptism, enlarging and cropping. I moved up close, shot at f1.8-2.5 with an ISO of 1600 and it worked out nicely.
I was very reluctant to use my flash during such a service.
I was very reluctant to use my flash during such a service.
GrandmaG wrote:
I have many flashes, including the 900; but I may have to get a commander-type flash for when I'm using multiple flashes for portraits since the D500 doesn't have that feature.
EDIT:
Which flash did you buy?
EDIT:
Which flash did you buy?
May 31, 2017 09:17:41 #
The D7500 won't be using XQD cards either! It has the new processor, but I don't believe it has the same auto focus or metering system that makes the D500 so prominent if you're into wildlife/sports.
May 31, 2017 09:21:26 #
DaveO wrote:
The D7500 won't be using XQD cards either! It has the new processor, but I don't believe it has the same auto focus or metering system that makes the D500 so prominent if you're into wildlife/sports.
Other than the D5, the focusing system of the D500 is without peer in my humble opinion.
May 31, 2017 09:36:45 #
I took the leap from D7000 to a D750 and have never looked back! I also purchased a Sigma 50mm Art lens as well and already owned the 24-70mm f/2.8. You WILL NOT regret it if this is the decision you make. I also considered the D500; however, I rented both prior to purchase and the D750 (for my purposes) was the winner. I kept my D7000 as a back-up along with my DX lenses. Look forward to seeing images from your new purchase!
May 31, 2017 09:54:20 #
An answer to your concerns is not that difficult. I have one question for you, how often do you photograph in a light similar to that you encountered when you photographed your granddaughter? If you do so often and your D7100 did not do the job you need a new camera. Were you using a fast lens? Are you sure your technique was appropriate for the lighting? Were you using RAW files?
I do not own a D7100 I use a D7000 and when confronted with using such a high shutter speed with a slow lens I edit with a noise reduction software and I use Topaz Denoise.
Evaluate your options. I have no experience with the D500 so I cannot give you any advise but make sure first that the D7100 is not capable of doing the job if indeed you shoot often in low light. Perhaps a faster lens or an improvement in your techniques is all that is needed.
I do not own a D7100 I use a D7000 and when confronted with using such a high shutter speed with a slow lens I edit with a noise reduction software and I use Topaz Denoise.
Evaluate your options. I have no experience with the D500 so I cannot give you any advise but make sure first that the D7100 is not capable of doing the job if indeed you shoot often in low light. Perhaps a faster lens or an improvement in your techniques is all that is needed.
May 31, 2017 09:58:32 #
Jim Bob wrote:
Other than the D5, the focusing system of the D500 is without peer in my humble opinion.
There is no question in my mind,particularly when I was able to understand and utilize some of the features.
May 31, 2017 10:28:52 #
NJphotodoc
Loc: Now in the First State
Like you, I moved up from a D5000 to a D7000. After a while I did my research and found that the D7200 better fits my needs so sold the 7000 and got the D7200 (BTW all were bought as Nikon refurb through Cameta so sticker shock was less of an issue and the equipment has never let me down).
Since you already have a DX lens investment, you have to ask the question what advantages for the kind of photos you are taking would a FF camera bring you? Also the cost diffential of a D500 vs a D7200 can be substantial and while the D500 does have advantages for sports photos, is this something you are or are planning to do a lot of?
Might be time to sit down with a piece of paper and outline for yourself what you plan to use your new camera for and how each camera you are considering weighs in. As folks pointed out, a great photo is determined by the camera, the glass and most importantly the photographer.
Since you already have a DX lens investment, you have to ask the question what advantages for the kind of photos you are taking would a FF camera bring you? Also the cost diffential of a D500 vs a D7200 can be substantial and while the D500 does have advantages for sports photos, is this something you are or are planning to do a lot of?
Might be time to sit down with a piece of paper and outline for yourself what you plan to use your new camera for and how each camera you are considering weighs in. As folks pointed out, a great photo is determined by the camera, the glass and most importantly the photographer.
May 31, 2017 11:02:31 #
Greenmachine
Loc: Chicago, IL
GrandmaG wrote:
Ever since I bought the D7100, I have been questio... (show quote)
You may have already made your decision by now, but I'll toss my 3 cents in anyway! :) I have both the FX750 AND the DX7200, so I feel like I have two GREAT cameras: Yes the DX500 has a few more
bells and whistles but my DX7200 is a fantastic all-around camera with 24MPs and the in-camera flash and better for indoor and low light photography. But the 500 is much better for video capabilities and
outdoor/action/wildlife photography, I am told. No sense getting into a testosterone contest about the 750 vs. the 810, but the 24 MP 750 is lighter, with in-camera flash if needed and great for low light, high ISO
That being said, I hear that new versions of BOTH these FF cameras are on the way, and are expected to have more MP s and be more expensive, of course!
Best of luck and keep us all posted on your final choice, OK?
May 31, 2017 11:08:21 #
I own a D500 plus two other FX cameras. There are two big reasons I think the D500 would be a better choice for you personally. The first is that you already have the lenses and/or may not need to purchase FX lenses. The second reason is that the D500 is a superior camera having some of the latest, and most important features, of the D5. A separate processor for focusing and an expeed 5 processor being very important. No other current Nikon has either of these two features. For the next few days you can obtain the D500 at a $200 savings AND get a battery grip thrown in for free. That's a great deal. Check out the B&H site. Best of luck. Please make you decision before this, and other, deals pass.
May 31, 2017 11:09:21 #
Greenmachine wrote:
You may have already made your decision by now, bu... (show quote)
From another member of the Green Machine! 
May 31, 2017 12:23:00 #
Kissel vonKeister
Loc: Georgia
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I borrowed 2 D500's recently.
Shot our university graduation with them and the D810.
The D500 images were as good for my purposes.
With the right (fast) lenses, I don't see the need for a full frame camera any more. I used the 17-55 and the 70-200 with the D500.
The button layout is different than what you are used to, but I think it's easier to use.
Shot our university graduation with them and the D810.
The D500 images were as good for my purposes.
With the right (fast) lenses, I don't see the need for a full frame camera any more. I used the 17-55 and the 70-200 with the D500.
The button layout is different than what you are used to, but I think it's easier to use.
Good points. After using a Fujifilm X series camera, I don't see the need for full frame cameras or their bulky and expensive lenses either. I own Nikon stuff too, and I have some FF Nikon lenses that I adapt successfully to the Fujifilm X-E2. The X-E2 is no longer in production, but I bought that body just to make an entry into the Fuji system. I may soon have some items for sale.
May 31, 2017 15:34:21 #
StanRP
Loc: Ontario Canada
GrandmaG wrote:
Ever since I bought the D7100, I have been questio... (show quote)
re:The church was poorly lit and even at ISO 5000, the pictures of the Bishop and my granddaughter were mostly unusable. Still, a picture is better than NO picture.
This was taken in a church setting using a Nikon D500
Exposure 1/15 Sec f/5.0 and ISO 5000
May 31, 2017 15:50:17 #
Greenmachine
Loc: Chicago, IL
StanRP wrote:
re:The church was poorly lit and even at ISO 5000, the pictures of the Bishop and my granddaughter were mostly unusable. Still, a picture is better than NO picture.
This was taken in a church setting using a Nikon D500
Exposure 1/15 Sec f/5.0 and ISO 5000
This was taken in a church setting using a Nikon D500
Exposure 1/15 Sec f/5.0 and ISO 5000
Don't be so hard on yourself: This is a nice shot considering the high ISO and slow shutter speed! The noise is negligible, and almost looks a tripod was used:
U make us fellow D750 owners proud!!
Thanks for sharing... ---Greenmachine
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.