Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Filter for the lens
Aug 24, 2011 04:40:38   #
Ugly Hedgehog Newsletter
 
Hi,

Just got a nikon d80 with tamron lens.
What kind of filter lens should I get, to protect my investment???

Thanks. Henri.

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 05:45:12   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Typically people use a UV filter to prevent lens scratches or other damage. Usually these are sandwich glass/film/glass and so are like old auto safety glass and absorb a hit without flying apart. UV are not expensive and are standard stock.
Enjoy that new camera.

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 09:03:16   #
Anthony Charles Loc: Santa Maria
 
i PERSONALLY PREFER A LENS HOOD AS A FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2011 10:19:06   #
Randyb1969 Loc: Armpit of California
 
I agree with Anthony. Everything I've read actually goes against using a filter solely for protecting the lens. First off, lenses are surprisingly sturdy and as long as you're not banging it around a lot it will be fine. If you are banging it around a lot, the filter isn't going to help nearly as much as being more careful. Secondly, I've read every level of glass added to the front changes the quality of the photo so unless the filter is serving a purpose artistically, it's getting in the way.

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 13:47:53   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
I agree that each glass detracts, but how much, for most takes, not much.

The question asked was an IF I, THEN WHICH question. It appears that the writer wants to protect his lens.

I personally, and probably Henri, would much rather wipe off dirt, or lens coating etching baby spit finger print, in the field from a filter than chance my lens -- once the D-80 lens is damaged then ouch $ tragic,,, if filter is damaged then throw it over your left shoulder and put on a new one.

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 14:55:46   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
Randyb1969 wrote:
I agree with Anthony. Everything I've read actually goes against using a filter solely for protecting the lens. First off, lenses are surprisingly sturdy and as long as you're not banging it around a lot it will be fine. If you are banging it around a lot, the filter isn't going to help nearly as much as being more careful. Secondly, I've read every level of glass added to the front changes the quality of the photo so unless the filter is serving a purpose artistically, it's getting in the way.


I humbly disagree. The UV filter DOES have a purpose and you could call it artistic if you want. It filters UV and under close scrutiny you can see the effect in an A-B comparison. The UV filtered result has a cleaner crisper look by removing a certain haze that is UV related and colors seem more saturated and pure. I've kept one on every lens of every film and digital camera I've owned since the 1970s.

Secondly, I'd rather have a thrown baby toy, golf ball, burning ash from a nearby bonfire, or somebody knocking over a light stand hit a UV filter than the front glass of my lens any day of the week compared to what a minimalist might think is a possible, but never proven, negative effect of a UV filter. Twice I've had a UV filter ring hit and the outer threads were bent enough so nothing else could be screwed into it. If that was my lens threads instead, that could have been fatal or I couldn't use "artistic" filters ever again. With a UV filter it was $5.00 to replace it.

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 18:40:27   #
brandy sanders Loc: louisiana
 
i shoot thru fences alot for baseball and to shoot without the fence in the shot you have to put it against the fence. i did buy a u v filter and it has saved my len.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2011 18:44:30   #
Johnny Loc: Shreveport, La
 
I actually dropped my brand new 50D and had a 18-200 lense on it as my strap got hung and yanked it out of my hand inevitably it is going to fall lense first and did. When I picked it up it was cracked like a car window and I had a deep pit in my stomach. As I further investigated the situation and painfully removing the damaged filter by sawing it in half as I couldn't unscrew it. I realized it had only damaged my filter. Needless to say I own lots of filters and will never not have that protection on my lenses. I have learned through my own recklessness any filter is better than non at all. FILTER UP GUYS

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 19:33:38   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Well, I am not alone in liking the world of filters;glad to see that. I standardized on 58mm for my Fuji-9000, Kodak z15-10 (hot glued a ring to the lens body ) and even adapted filters, and additional lenses to my Panasonic (glued to my hip) TZ-3. Oops, for got to mention my Canon G-2 that I converted to IR. E-Bay filter prices are right (low) and delivery from China has been fast and usually free !!!

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 19:45:04   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
One of the "uglyhedgehog" supporting ads above is quite a good source of information on filters. Check it out.
http://www.singh-ray.com

Reply
Aug 24, 2011 21:49:51   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
dpullum wrote:
Well, I am not alone in liking the world of filters;glad to see that. I standardized on 58mm for my Fuji-9000, Kodak z15-10 (hot glued a ring to the lens body ) and even adapted filters, and additional lenses to my Panasonic (glued to my hip) TZ-3. Oops, for got to mention my Canon G-2 that I converted to IR. E-Bay filter prices are right (low) and delivery from China has been fast and usually free !!!


You seem to be quite liberal with your glue. Isn't it hard to see the viewfinder with the Panasonic glued to your hip?

:lol:

Reply
 
 
Aug 25, 2011 06:36:13   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Indeed hard to see glued to the hip, in fact, screens are not good at all in the sunny out of doors. The Fuji and Kodak both have eye view as well as screen. If I were to design a digital camera, I would keep the screen only for menu. The ideal would be like the basic 35mm I had; focus ring, ring for f and a knob for speed and ISO, needle for amount of light ,,, like the old Pentax K-1000. What do you think?

Reply
Aug 25, 2011 12:48:53   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
dpullum wrote:
Indeed hard to see glued to the hip, in fact, screens are not good at all in the sunny out of doors. The Fuji and Kodak both have eye view as well as screen. If I were to design a digital camera, I would keep the screen only for menu. The ideal would be like the basic 35mm I had; focus ring, ring for f and a knob for speed and ISO, needle for amount of light ,,, like the old Pentax K-1000. What do you think?


I think that with that mindset we'd be sending Selectric typed messages to each other by USPS mail to have this forum!

:wink:

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.