Everypixel aesthetics test: I found this site through another forum and find it fascinating and addictive. I guess it's not quite infallible as it rated one of Ansel Adam's photos at...

buckwheat Loc: Clarkdale, AZ and Belen NM

I found this site through another forum and find it fascinating and addictive. I guess it's not quite infallible as it rated one of Ansel Adam's photos at 11%. Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
Here's the link: https://www.dpreview.com/news/8594541449/everypixel-aesthetics-uses-neural-networks-to-judge-your-photographs

I am pleased that it rated this on at 99.5%

BassmanBruce Loc: Middle of the Mitten

Nice shot, I'd rate it that high or higher.

Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana

buckwheat wrote:

I found this site through another forum and find it fascinating and addictive. I guess it's not quite infallible as it rated one of Ansel Adam's photos at 11%. Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
Here's the link: https://www.dpreview.com/news/8594541449/everypixel-aesthetics-uses-neural-networks-to-judge-your-photographs

I am pleased that it rated this on at 99.5%

I can see where it would be addictive. It could be used as a good keyword generator (I suck at keywording). My question though, is what they do with the images that you drag to the screen. They now have a copy of them, and could probably turn around and sell them without you knowing about it. Very nice shot by the way.

St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet

buckwheat wrote:

... Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
...

I wouldn't feel too bad, it rated one of mine at 0.0%. How does anything get 0.0%? LAF

- See another discussion here Discuss: Everypixel

rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA

I dunno, one of mine got 79%; I kinda liked that. However, the next one got 0.0%; didn't like that. I agree about the keywording aspect.

BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA

Well, it rated one AA at 13%, an HCB at 33% and a professional portrait of Annie Leibovitz (photographer unknown, but she uses it as her primary portrait) at 9%. Granted that third generation of such shots are of inferior quality, I still think the range indicates that the program needs a bit of fine tuning. And no, I didn't try one of my shots; no guts.

rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA

Surprisingly, it rated my uploaded image at 99.6%. Although I do quite like the image, I still think the score is a bit too high for it.

GeoJB

subscribed

Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC

buckwheat wrote:

I found this site through another forum and find it fascinating and addictive. I guess it's not quite infallible as it rated one of Ansel Adam's photos at 11%. Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
Here's the link: https://www.dpreview.com/news/8594541449/everypixel-aesthetics-uses-neural-networks-to-judge-your-photographs

I am pleased that it rated this on at 99.5%

My image got a good rating.

(Download)

fergmark Loc: norwalk connecticut

It seems to like some of my black and white images. Mark

(Download)

dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida

You think for a minute I will put my toe into that dark purple wavering hole... yikes... That is "self image" suicide!!! well maybe later.... the test is at:
https://everypixel.com/aesthetics

fergmark Loc: norwalk connecticut

easy come easy go.

fergmark Loc: norwalk connecticut

with too much help like this, and apps that tell us what our crying baby needs, the human race will find itself on the endangered species list.

speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho

buckwheat wrote:

I found this site through another forum and find it fascinating and addictive. I guess it's not quite infallible as it rated one of Ansel Adam's photos at 11%. Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
Here's the link: https://www.dpreview.com/news/8594541449/everypixel-aesthetics-uses-neural-networks-to-judge-your-photographs

I am pleased that it rated this on at 99.5%

I tried 3, the first was 96.9, second 92.9 and third 89.6

Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana

fergmark wrote:

easy come easy go.

That's a great image. Maybe it doesn't take composition into account.