For now, this is my only worthy boudoir shot that I can post -- because the model cannot be identified. She struck this pose on her own. She seemed like a natural.
As I said elsewhere, I stopped doing this kind of photography because of the excessive arrangements and preparation involved. I do like the results, though.
anotherview wrote:
For now, this is my only worthy boudoir shot that I can post -- because the model cannot be identified. She struck this pose on her own. She seemed like a natural.
As I said elsewhere, I stopped doing this kind of photography because of the excessive arrangements and preparation involved. I do like the results, though.
This is a very beautiful shot of a very beautiful Model!
Though the B&W works pretty well, Sometimes I think there is just not enough contrast in people shots to make the B&W really strong. Either way it works very well.
I really like it. The simplicity of it helps a lot.
Nice job!!
SS
Bret
Loc: Dayton Ohio
Yes nice capture. For me the B&W versions are even harder. Like SS said...the contrast makes or breaks it. This photo takes me back to the 60's era....well done.
trc
Loc: Logan, OH
anotherview wrote:
For now, this is my only worthy boudoir shot that I can post -- because the model cannot be identified. She struck this pose on her own. She seemed like a natural.
As I said elsewhere, I stopped doing this kind of photography because of the excessive arrangements and preparation involved. I do like the results, though.
I really like the simplicity, yet the symmetry of this shot - WOW! Her legs seem to be just about perfect! The B&W seems to work quite well, perhaps just a tad more contrast between the lights and the darks - what do you think? Then again, maybe not. Did you do a slight dark vignetting around the corners? Also, I just wonder what it would look like in color - just my own curiosity?
Best Regards,
Tom
P.S. I also think you did a great job offsetting her knees and her head direction in opposite directions - very cool balance!
Great use of light in this shot. Her skin tone has a warmth that isn't normally found in B&W shots; she's well posed too!
Thank you for your kind comment.
SharpShooter wrote:
This is a very beautiful shot of a very beautiful Model!
Though the B&W works pretty well, Sometimes I think there is just not enough contrast in people shots to make the B&W really strong. Either way it works very well.
I really like it. The simplicity of it helps a lot.
Nice job!!
SS
Thank you for your kind comment. Yes, I struggled here to achieve an accurate skin tone of the model. So I went black-and-white with this photograph of her. I kept the look simple, using only two lights. Maybe this approach had something to do with the photograph conjuring an earlier era.
Bret wrote:
Yes nice capture. For me the B&W versions are even harder. Like SS said...the contrast makes or breaks it. This photo takes me back to the 60's era....well done.
Tom: Thanks for your critique of my boudoir shot. I just read it. I missed it earlier.
Sometimes things come together, as they did here. Yes, the simplicity plays a part, and I do try for it on principle. Experienced photographers advise it, and I follow their advice.
The symmetry of this shot arises from its triangles -- a powerful compositional element, here made more so due to its coming from a natural configuration.
Yes, I agree on the need for more contrast. I used two umbrellas for lighting, one on each side, both set at the same power output. I might've set one a stop lower for improving the contrast. I excuse myself because this boudoir shoot was only my second try, and I was learning its demands and skills.
Yes, I did put vignetting in all four corners; in general, I use vignetting for all portraits. The subject then tends to bang out more.
As to a choice between color and B&W, you may agree that this shot emphasizes shape and structure although of a natural subject. Its makeup calls for B&W.
Let me close by giving credit to the model for choosing this pose. She is also most photogenic, too.
Thank you again for taking the time to comment on my photo.
Have a good day.
trc wrote:
I really like the simplicity, yet the symmetry of this shot - WOW! Her legs seem to be just about perfect! The B&W seems to work quite well, perhaps just a tad more contrast between the lights and the darks - what do you think? Then again, maybe not. Did you do a slight dark vignetting around the corners? Also, I just wonder what it would look like in color - just my own curiosity?
Best Regards,
Tom
P.S. I also think you did a great job offsetting her knees and her head direction in opposite directions - very cool balance!
I really like the simplicity, yet the symmetry of ... (
show quote)
Is this the last entry? Posted on may 27, 2016? Tell me it isn't so.
I believe the comments simply petered out. I did receive some kind and useful comments, though, for which I'm thankful.
RCJets wrote:
Is this the last entry? Posted on may 27, 2016? Tell me it isn't so.
I like. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I like a photograph because it "makes my eyes happy." I can direct all the technical stuff but I still come back to "does it make my eyes happy?" This one does so "I like."
Yes, on second look, the symmetry of this photograph adds to its visual impact. I had in mind more the composition at the time Thanks for appreciation..
trc wrote:
I really like the simplicity, yet the symmetry of this shot - WOW! Her legs seem to be just about perfect! The B&W seems to work quite well, perhaps just a tad more contrast between the lights and the darks - what do you think? Then again, maybe not. Did you do a slight dark vignetting around the corners? Also, I just wonder what it would look like in color - just my own curiosity?
Best Regards,
Tom
P.S. I also think you did a great job offsetting her knees and her head direction in opposite directions - very cool balance!
I really like the simplicity, yet the symmetry of ... (
show quote)
Definitely, this photograph has eye appeal, if I may enjoy my own work. Thanks for comment.
vertigo wrote:
I like. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I like a photograph because it "makes my eyes happy." I can direct all the technical stuff but I still come back to "does it make my eyes happy?" This one does so "I like."
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
I wish I had taken this photograph, which is my highest compliment for your beautiful work.
Thank you for liking my photograph. I agree the result counts most because the viewer sees it, not all the technical sides.
Interestingly, this photograph has lain dormant for 2 or 3 years, and only now has gained a new life here. Frankly, I'd forgotten all about it.
vertigo wrote:
I like. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I like a photograph because it "makes my eyes happy." I can direct all the technical stuff but I still come back to "does it make my eyes happy?" This one does so "I like."
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.