Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Duplicate .NEF files
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 5, 2016 21:13:58   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
Nikon D7000. What setting caused this duplicate nef files. It doesn't seem like raw + jpeg as all the files are listed as nef and are the same size.
Screenshot attached. Thanks



Reply
Mar 5, 2016 21:15:53   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
bsmith52 wrote:
Nikon D7000. What setting caused this duplicate nef files. It doesn't seem like raw + jpeg as all the files are listed as nef and are the same size.
Screenshot attached. Thanks

By any chance do you have the backup setup for the second drive? If so that is likely why.

Reply
Mar 5, 2016 21:28:23   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
That list is from my hard drive file structure loaded from one disk. Would my drive auto load them that way if from 2 different cards?

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2016 21:51:58   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
bsmith52 wrote:
That list is from my hard drive file structure loaded from one disk. Would my drive auto load them that way if from 2 different cards?

I have no clue but when you select to have a backup the numbering looks like that hence my guess.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 12:56:57   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
bsmith52 wrote:
That list is from my hard drive file structure loaded from one disk. Would my drive auto load them that way if from 2 different cards?


That can happen when the same files are downloaded twice to the same directory.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 13:19:52   #
brucewells Loc: Central Kentucky
 
bsmith52 wrote:
Nikon D7000. What setting caused this duplicate nef files. It doesn't seem like raw + jpeg as all the files are listed as nef and are the same size.
Screenshot attached. Thanks


Typically, if files are duplicated in the same folder, Windows will add a (2) to the end of the file name. (Is this an Apple PC?) There must be some software you're using that is adding the '-001'.

So, what software are you using to migrate from camera to hard drive? If you look at the contents of the memory card, does the file exist only once, or is it there twice as your image indicates?

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 16:37:09   #
Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
 
Rongnongno wrote:
By any chance do you have the backup setup for the second drive? If so that is likely why.

I just set my D7000 to use the second drive for backup and fired off a couple of shots. The filenames were the same on both cards. Interesting...

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2016 19:18:54   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
brucewells wrote:
Typically, if files are duplicated in the same folder, Windows will add a (2) to the end of the file name. (Is this an Apple PC?) There must be some software you're using that is adding the '-001'.

So, what software are you using to migrate from camera to hard drive? If you look at the contents of the memory card, does the file exist only once, or is it there twice as your image indicates?


Windows PC. Sometimes I would use the windows default loader, other times open with Picasa. That does make sense that somehow the software/downloader would duplicate and add the .oox number.

Currently reorganizing my 30K+ pictures and migrating to LR CC. Going to take a while but once I get done, worth the work I'm sure.

Thanks to all for the responses

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 19:22:57   #
brucewells Loc: Central Kentucky
 
bsmith52 wrote:
Windows PC. Sometimes I would use the windows default loader, other times open with Picasa. That does make sense that somehow the software/downloader would duplicate and add the .oox number.

Currently reorganizing my 30K+ pictures and migrating to LR CC. Going to take a while but once I get done, worth the work I'm sure.

Thanks to all for the responses


:thumbup: Good luck. Lotsa work, but as you say, it'll be worth it.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 19:41:58   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
bsmith52 wrote:
...Currently reorganizing my 30K+ pictures and migrating to LR CC. Going to take a while but once I get done, worth the work I'm sure...


Don't try to do it quickly. Take the time to do it right. In particular, be as complete as possible with the keywords. It will pay off later.

I just went through my pictures because I had neglected things for so long. I had about 55K in my catalog. I split the catalog up into years and went through one year at a time. There were dupes from the early days when I didn't really know what I was doing, there were bursts, there were junk shots, all sorts of problems. The early years took about a day a year (not so many pix). The later years when I had higher frame rates and larger cards took several days per year. A lot of the pictures were pretty skimpily keyworded. In particular I had to add as many names to the keywords as I could. The whole process took me 6 weeks. I then combined the years into a master catalog. (I'm pretty free in the winter. If I had a job it would have taken longer). I got the catalog down to 18K. I did it in two steps: (1) delete junk; (2) complete keywording.

But now I have a fairly well organized catalog. Much better than before. I just have to keep disciplined when adding new images.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 20:03:10   #
Macronaut Loc: Redondo Beach,Ca.
 
Erik_H wrote:
I just set my D7000 to use the second drive for backup and fired off a couple of shots. The filenames were the same on both cards. Interesting...
So, let me see if I have this right. In your camera, you had one card slot set for raw and the other slot set for back up, also raw? And then, did you upload straight from your camera? If so, then this makes perfect sense to me. The 001 would distinguish between two identical files.

Or, did I completely miss something?

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2016 20:04:44   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
I'm doing pretty much the same...organizing, deleting junk on my hard drive, going by year then subfoldering into occasions.
Then will import and export in LR.

You're right...whew, exhausting/time consuming.

And to top it all off, when that is done, I plan on making a family Smug Mug site for posterity. Gonna be at this for a while

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 20:07:23   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
Macronaut wrote:
So, let me see if I have this right. In your camera, you had one card slot set for raw and the other slot set for back up, also raw? And then, did you upload straight from your camera? If so, then this makes perfect sense to me. The 001 would distinguish between two identical files.

Or, did I completely miss something?


I don't remember ever backing up straight from camera, usually insert my sd cards.

But as you have been reading, my work flow process has been all over the map. Could have happened. Correcting that issue now.

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 20:20:29   #
Macronaut Loc: Redondo Beach,Ca.
 
bsmith52 wrote:
I don't remember ever backing up straight from camera, usually insert my sd cards.

But as you have been reading, my work flow process has been all over the map. Could have happened. Correcting that issue now.
Well, I suppose that if the camera was set to back duplicate on both SD cards, it might not matter whether you inserted the cards one at a time or straight from camera.

If your work flow is all over the place, we may never know what happened :wink: :-)

Reply
Mar 6, 2016 22:26:00   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Macronaut wrote:
Well, I suppose that if the camera was set to back duplicate on both SD cards, it might not matter whether you inserted the cards one at a time or straight from camera.

If your work flow is all over the place, we may never know what happened :wink: :-)


Yep mystery explained. He inserted both cards which had duplicate files and thus duplicated the files on the hard drive.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.