Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Help with Neutral Density filters
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 10, 2016 11:18:29   #
Triplets Loc: Reading, MA
 
Hoggers,

I'm having difficulty making sense of the numbers on an ND filter.

In one article I read ( http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2015/11/13/how-and-when-to-use-nd-filters-and-what-the-numbers-mean-2/ ), it says ND128 is a 7-stop reduction. But when I search ND filters at B & H, I see B+W ND110 that is listed as a 10-stop reduction ( http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/752927-REG/B_W_1066177_77mm_110_Solid_Neutral.html ).

Can anyone shed light on this for me?

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:25:01   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
There is a useful chart here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral-density_filter

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:29:33   #
Triplets Loc: Reading, MA
 
bsprague wrote:


Thanks...I guess there is no "standard" system. Chart is somewhat helpful.

Regards,

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2016 11:37:47   #
big-guy Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
 
For every stop, the amount of light either increases or decreases by a factor of 2. When using a ND the light is reduced.

1 is the base exposure (no filter)
2 is 1 stops difference, twice or ½ the light (from base)
4 is 2 stops difference, 4 times or ¼ the light (from base)
8 is 3 stops difference, 8 times or 1/8 the light (from base)
16 is 4 stops difference, 16 times or 1/16 the light (from base)
32 is 5 stops difference, 32 times or 1/32 the light (from base)
64 is 6 stops difference, 64 times or 1/64 the light (from base)
128 is 7 stops difference, 128 times or 1/128 the light (from base)
continue as you wish...

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:41:14   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Dennis,

The answer is in the chart. It is more than "somewhat" helpful! ND filters are used in so many applications like microscopes, telescopes, movie cameras and on, there are different numbering or rating systems. The easiest for photographers is the f-stop reduction.

One rating system states that an ND128 will give a 7 stop reduction. A different rating system says an ND 110 (notice the space) is 10 stops.

The charts shows how an ND128 is equal to a ND 107.

To make it worse, the various brands will use different systems.

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:43:02   #
Triplets Loc: Reading, MA
 
big-guy wrote:
For every stop, the amount of light either increases or decreases by a factor of 2. When using a ND the light is reduced.

1 is the base exposure (no filter)
2 is 1 stops difference, twice or ½ the light (from base)
4 is 2 stops difference, 4 times or ¼ the light (from base)
8 is 3 stops difference, 8 times or 1/8 the light (from base)
16 is 4 stops difference, 16 times or 1/16 the light (from base)
32 is 5 stops difference, 32 times or 1/32 the light (from base)
64 is 6 stops difference, 64 times or 1/64 the light (from base)
128 is 7 stops difference, 128 times or 1/128 the light (from base)
continue as you wish...
For every stop, the amount of light either increas... (show quote)


That part I understand. My confusion is determining the difference in the number of stops. As I stated earlier, one article stated ND128 = 7 stops while a vendor's description stated ND110 = 10 stops.

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:44:46   #
Triplets Loc: Reading, MA
 
bsprague wrote:
Dennis,

The answer is in the chart. It is more than "somewhat" helpful! ND filters are used in so many applications like microscopes, telescopes, movie cameras and on, there are different numbering or rating systems. The easiest for photographers is the f-stop reduction.

One rating system states that an ND128 will give a 7 stop reduction. A different rating system says an ND 110 (notice the space) is 10 stops.

The charts shows how an ND128 is equal to a ND 107.

I guess the best way is to ask the salesperson at the time of purchase.

To make it worse, the various brands will use different systems.
Dennis, br br The answer is in the chart. It is ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2016 11:51:54   #
DGStinner Loc: New Jersey
 
Triplets wrote:
That part I understand. My confusion is determining the difference in the number of stops. As I stated earlier, one article stated ND128 = 7 stops while a vendor's description stated ND110 = 10 stops.

There's a space between ND and 110 which helps differentiate it from something like ND128 which don't have a space. When there's a space between ND and the number, the last two digits are the number of stops. For something like ND128, it's a matter of what power of 2 would equal 128. 2^7=128 so ND128 is a 7 stop filter.

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:55:33   #
Triplets Loc: Reading, MA
 
DGStinner wrote:
There's a space between ND and 110 which helps differentiate it from something like ND128 which don't have a space. When there's a space between ND and the number, the last two digits are the number of stops. For something like ND128, it's a matter of what power of 2 would equal 128. 2^7=128 so ND128 is a 7 stop filter.


Thank you...that makes sense to me.

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 11:57:02   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Triplets wrote:
Hoggers,

I'm having difficulty making sense of the numbers on an ND filter.

In one article I read (http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2015/11/13/how-and-when-to-use-nd-filters-and-what-the-numbers-mean-2/), it says ND128 is a 7-stop reduction. But when I search ND filters at B & H, I see B+W ND110 that is listed as a 10-stop reduction (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/752927-REG/B_W_1066177_77mm_110_Solid_Neutral.html).

Can anyone shed light on this for me?


Having, and being knowledgeable in its use, a Capt. Midnight Secret Decoder Ring, will help immensely.
--Bob
8-)

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 13:14:28   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
I suggest getting a variable ND filter equal to the largest filter size of the largest lens you intend to have. Then, with simple, cheap step down rings you have an array of neutral density for all your lenses without having to adorn each lens separately.

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2016 13:15:46   #
Triplets Loc: Reading, MA
 
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
I suggest getting a variable ND filter equal to the largest filter size of the largest lens you intend to have. Then, with simple, cheap step down rings you have an array of neutral density for all your lenses without having to adorn each lens separately.


That has been suggested to me in the past and I find it to be good advice.

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 13:52:28   #
big-guy Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
 
It is called a step-UP ring which, as an example, allows you to use a large 72mm filter on a small 49mm lens. (step up to the filter)

A step down ring (very little use these days) allows you to use, following the above example, a small 49mm filter on a large 72mm lens and yes that will involve vignetting. (step down to the filter)

PhotoArtsLA wrote:
I suggest getting a variable ND filter equal to the largest filter size of the largest lens you intend to have. Then, with simple, cheap step down rings you have an array of neutral density for all your lenses without having to adorn each lens separately.

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 14:20:17   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
I suggest getting a variable ND filter equal to the largest filter size of the largest lens you intend to have. Then, with simple, cheap step down rings you have an array of neutral density for all your lenses without having to adorn each lens separately.


Variable ND filters can cause a myriad of issues, mostly a cross pattern in the image. They apparently work at particular f-stops, but not all f-stops.

Prior to purchasing one, I called Schneider and spoke with one of their personnel. They were very forth coming in stating the issue exists in all, including theirs. I decided to purchase the fixed ND filters instead.
--Bob

Reply
Feb 10, 2016 14:27:11   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
I think most only need two simple ND filters.

My kit contains a 3 stop for shooting in the brightest of sunlight when I want to open the aperture a little or slow the shutter speed a little, especially for video. I also have a 10 stop for "creative" water flowing and motion scenes. I don't think the variable versions are worth the price or that good at the higher settings.

For the graduated density versions, they split the image at the middle and make composition a PITA. It is better and easier to get the dynamic range of a RAW capture and make the adjustments in software like Lightroom.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.