Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Just starting out in macro
Apr 18, 2012 10:16:09   #
grhound Loc: Maine
 
I'm new to shooting macro and am limited in my equipment. I just got a Marumi +3 to attach to any of my 58mm lens so I do not have an actual macro lens yet. I just wanted to see if it was something that I could do before I invested any real money. Let me know what you think. I am shooting with a Canon T2i 18-55 and 55-250 IS lens. All these were shot handheld at about 8 inches.

This was from my first attempt
This was from my first attempt...

Bee on a Grape Hycinth (hopefully the correct spelling)
Bee on a Grape Hycinth (hopefully the correct spel...

Hornet
Hornet...

The same hornet
The same hornet...

Beetle on wire fence
Beetle on wire fence...

Ladybug with wings out
Ladybug with wings out...

Crop of the Ladybug
Crop of the Ladybug...

Reply
Apr 18, 2012 11:37:30   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
I appreciate your desire to do macro-photography, and that you have a limited budget.

That said, attaching a +3 lens to a zoom lens is like putting knobby tires on a station wagon because you want to go off-roading. Can be done, but you won't particularly like the results.

The only "macros" that you posted above are radical crops of close-up photographs (wasp & ladybird beetle). Are you willing to settle for poor resolution & uncontrolled DOF?

Reply
Apr 20, 2012 21:31:01   #
grhound Loc: Maine
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
I appreciate your desire to do macro-photography, and that you have a limited budget.
That said, attaching a +3 lens to a zoom lens is like putting knobby tires on a station wagon because you want to go off-roading. Can be done, but you won't particularly like the results.
The only "macros" that you posted above are radical crops of close-up photographs (wasp & ladybird beetle). Are you willing to settle for poor resolution & uncontrolled DOF?
Actually the only pic that was cropped was the ladybug. All the others were the original pictures with some basic edits in photoshop, but I agree that they are probably not as good as they could have been but under the circumstances I was trying to get a critique on the pics not the equipment that I was using. I am wonder if I said I had a 100mm Canon Macro would you have had a different opinion of the pictures instead of focusing on what I was using to take the pictures.

Reply
 
 
Apr 20, 2012 22:18:13   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
grhound wrote:
Actually the only pic that was cropped was the ladybug. All the others were the original pictures with some basic edits in photoshop, but I agree that they are probably not as good as they could have been but under the circumstances I was trying to get a critique on the pics not the equipment that I was using. I am wonder if I said I had a 100mm Canon Macro would you have had a different opinion of the pictures instead of focusing on what I was using to take the pictures.
Your wasp photos exhibit extremely narrow DOF. That is not a lens characteristic, but directly related to choice of aperture. Same aperture with a 100-mm lens would produce same problem.

Your ladybird beetle image demonstrated spherical aberration, which occurs when you force a lens beyond its capability. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_aberration ). You will not have this problem with a dedicated true macro lens, whether 60-mm, 100-mm, or 200-mm, regardless of manufacturer.

Reply
Apr 20, 2012 23:12:32   #
grhound Loc: Maine
 
Thank you for your response, I am just trying to see if this is something that I might be able to do. I really enjoy the details in all the small things that we usually do not try to seek out. Hopefully things will change in the near future and I will be able to take real macros.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.