New poll shows 48% of Americans don't believe the government's conspiracy theory of 9/11 #2
amadjuster wrote:
What was Dan Patrick convicted of? You said he was a criminal.
Patrick wasn't indicted because bankruptcy laws allowed him to screw his creditors. When he later made $26 million by selling his radio stations, he still refused to pay his debts.
He may not be a convicted criminal, but he is a criminal in my book, same as the banksters who took all of us for a bundle in 2008.
Read all his sordid adult history:
http://www.texasmonthly.com/story/here-comes-trouble
larrypayne wrote:
Patrick wasn't indicted because bankruptcy laws allowed him to screw his creditors. When he later made $26 million by selling his radio stations, he still refused to pay his debts.
He may not be a convicted criminal, but he is a criminal in my book, same as the banksters who took all of us for a bundle in 2008.
Read all his sordid adult history:
http://www.texasmonthly.com/story/here-comes-troubleSo you pick and choose who is a criminal, not a factual based matter of a conviction in a criminal court of law. At least no one can accuse you of being judgemental.
Quote:
James Shaw wrote:
So, Larry, it must have been the plane that hit the Pentagon and not your drummed up and absurd idea of a "missile." What happened to the black box of the airplane that hit the Pentagon?
Larry lives in a demon's world with absurd and non-verifiable fiction stories to fit his need for attention and support for his hatred.
larrypayne wrote:
The black box data for Flight 77 released by NTSB reveals Flight 77 never got below 273 ft in altitude:
"Another astonishing discovery is that the data also confirms that the last figure of altitude given was 273 feet above ground level. (The pentagon is 71 feet tall). This is from radio altitude so its accurate to within just several feet.
The VOR (A data entry figure that is used to determine the distance from an object, in this case a t***smitter at the Airport near the Pentagon) gives a last distance of 1.5 miles from F77 to the t***smitter. Combine this information with the last figure of given altitude and also with speed of the plane (530 mph) and simply something just doesnt add up.
At the speed the plane was moving this puts Flight 77 2 seconds away from the face of the Pentagon. At that point the height was such that the plane could NOT have nosedived fast enough to have hit the face of the building where that hole was seen: the gravity forces at the acceleration required would buckle and simply cause an airframe to break up."http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/240607Data2.htmWhat this indicates is . . . Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon as the missile struck the building.
The black box data for Flight 77 released by NTSB ... (
show quote)
If they found the black box, then where did they find the black box? If the plane disappeared then how come they found the black box?
You are weird Larry, very, very weird. When you try to make sense you make nonsense, and that is why no one believes you and why you are not credible. And, as your absurdities continue, they make you ever more weird. Your twisted mind works against you, and it is doing you in.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77
James Shaw wrote:
If they found the black box, then where did they find the black box? If the plane disappeared then how come they found the black box?
You are weird Larry, very, very weird. When you try to make sense you make nonsense, and that is why no one believes you and why you are not credible. And, as your absurdities continue, they make you ever more weird. Your twisted mind works against you, and it is doing you in.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77They found the black box in Flight 77 after it landed at Stewart AFB after it flew over the Pentagon instead of into it.
"Lauder, president of the Jewish National Fund and former chairman of New York Governor George Pataki's Commission on Privatization, is the key individual who pushed the privatization of the WTC and former Stewart AFB, where the flight paths of the two planes that hit the twin towers oddly converged. Ronald Lauder played a significant, albeit unreported, role in the pr********n for 9/11."http://www.rense.com/general64/moss.htm
amadjuster wrote:
So you pick and choose who is a criminal, not a factual based matter of a conviction in a criminal court of law. At least no one can accuse you of being judgemental.
Criminal behavior is how I judge criminals.
Many of the worst criminals in the world have not been convicted.
George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and all the other 9/11 perps come to mind first.
larrypayne wrote:
Criminal behavior is how I judge criminals.
Many of the worst criminals in the world have not been convicted.
George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and all the other 9/11 perps come to mind first.
What is Dan Patrick's specific criminal behavior? Is it the fact he filed for bankruptcy? Is it the fact he did not offer to pay back debts that were forgiven due to bankruptcy and for which he had no legal obligation? How, exactly, is that criminal?
amadjuster wrote:
What is Dan Patrick's specific criminal behavior? Is it the fact he filed for bankruptcy? Is it the fact he did not offer to pay back debts that were forgiven due to bankruptcy and for which he had no legal obligation? How, exactly, is that criminal?
A non-criminal mentality would have seen the moral correctness of paying off their bankruptcy debts after coming into a $26 million windfall.
If you had been one of the victim's of Patrick's bankruptcy and you saw him become a multi-millionaire and still refuse to pay his debts to you, wouldn't you consider him to be a criminal?
larrypayne wrote:
A non-criminal mentality would have seen the moral correctness of paying off their bankruptcy debts after coming into a $26 million windfall.
If you had been one of the victim's of Patrick's bankruptcy and you saw him become a multi-millionaire and still refuse to pay his debts to you, wouldn't you consider him to be a criminal?
Well, if he went through bankruptcy and then became a multi-millionaire afterwards, he has no legal obligation to pay anything before his bankruptcy. Criminality has nothing to do with it. Your logic is not normal. You just don't like the guy because he doesn't believe like you do, but he wil now be your Lt. Governor! Isn't life great?
You just v**e for losers.
amadjuster wrote:
Well, if he went through bankruptcy and then became a multi-millionaire afterwards, he has no legal obligation to pay anything before his bankruptcy. Criminality has nothing to do with it. Your logic is not normal. You just don't like the guy because he doesn't believe like you do, but he wil now be your Lt. Governor! Isn't life great?
You just v**e for losers.
Your morals and mine are extreme opposites.
When Patrick is elected, he's going to screw you along with everyone else.
larrypayne wrote:
Your morals and mine are extreme opposites.
When Patrick is elected, he's going to screw you along with everyone else.
How can an atheist have morals? What would they be based on?
amadjuster wrote:
How can an atheist have morals? What would they be based on?
Common sense and common decency along with human compassion for all living things.
larrypayne wrote:
They found the black box in Flight 77 after it landed at Stewart AFB after it flew over the Pentagon instead of into it.
"Lauder, president of the Jewish National Fund and former chairman of New York Governor George Pataki's Commission on Privatization, is the key individual who pushed the privatization of the WTC and former Stewart AFB, where the flight paths of the two planes that hit the twin towers oddly converged. Ronald Lauder played a significant, albeit unreported, role in the pr********n for 9/11."http://www.rense.com/general64/moss.htmThey found the black box in Flight 77 after it lan... (
show quote)
Not what I read Larry. You said before the plane disappeared. What a wacko you are, indeed.
"The conclusion of the evidence is indisputable."
"To accept as a reasonable possibility that flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, one would have to first directly confront the evidence concluding that it did. It is inconceivable that out of the 136 reported eyewitnesses, or the other few hundred people within a clear vicinity of the Pentagon, not *one* eyewitness reported then or even to this day that they saw something other then a commercial airplane hit the Pentagon. Nor is there a reasonable hypothesis to how the pieces of flight 77 including its black box found its way to the impact zone if it did not crash there. And the DNA evidence concludes that Flight 77 was the only possible airplane which may have been responsible for the damage. The evidence tells a clear and consistent story."
"If flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon then something else did. In over a decade after 9/11 no one has been able to provide evidence supporting any coherent alternative to the official story."
http://www.debate.org/debates/It-is-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-that-flight-77-hit-the-Pentagon/1/And that is why you, Larry, are a wacko.
larrypayne wrote:
Common sense and common decency along with human compassion for all living things.
But in order to have "common" sense and decency, one must have a belief system to anchor it to. The alternative is for everyone to have their own set of absolute beliefs, their own private set of "Common" sense and decency. What makes your ideas better than anyone else's?
Quote:
larrypayne wrote:
Common sense and common decency along with human compassion for all living things.
amadjuster wrote:
But in order to have "common" sense and decency, one must have a belief system to anchor it to. The alternative is for everyone to have their own set of absolute beliefs, their own private set of "Common" sense and decency. What makes your ideas better than anyone else's?
"Larry Payne does not have common sense, common decency along with human compassion for all living things." Larry is a h**e monger with a convoluted mind that distorts issues to feed his h**e, and he promotes his hatred with the hope that he will convince others to h**e as he does.
PNagy
Loc: Missouri City, Texas
larrypayne: Patrick wasn't indicted because bankruptcy laws allowed him to screw his creditors. When he later made $26 million by selling his radio stations, he still refused to pay his debts.
He may not be a convicted criminal, but he is a criminal in my book, same as the banksters who took all of us for a bundle in 2008.
Read all his sordid adult history:
http://www.texasmonthly.com/story/here-comes-troubleamadjuster: So you pick and choose who is a criminal, not a factual based matter of a conviction in a criminal court of law. At least no one can accuse you of being judgmental.
Nagy: You need to learn the meaning of criminal. It is not just a person who has been convicted of a crime; it is any person who has committed a crime. By your narrow and incorrect definition, all the people who perpetrated KKK lynchings, but were excused for it by r****t courts, were not criminals.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.