Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
My first assignment from Nikonian72
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 6, 2012 00:32:30   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
dirtpusher wrote:
those teeth marks are incredible.. those are intense

Country Mama - What kinda critter?

Reply
Feb 6, 2012 09:12:04   #
Country's Mama Loc: Michigan
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
dirtpusher wrote:
those teeth marks are incredible.. those are intense

Country Mama - What kinda critter?


Probably squirrel. If we want hickory nuts and we are not out there right away picking them up the squirrels will have them gone in a day.

Reply
Feb 6, 2012 09:14:19   #
Country's Mama Loc: Michigan
 
dirtpusher wrote:
those teeth marks are incredable.. those are intense


It is amazing that something can have teeth that can chew through that hull. We use a table vise to crack them.

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2012 00:23:41   #
Janice Loc: Kentucky
 
Country's Mama wrote:
Here is what I came up with after 131 shots. This focusing is a lot harder than it looks, never mind the figuring out the exposures.


I think you did pretty darn good. Only room to improve now! smiling I just love macro

Reply
Feb 7, 2012 09:03:21   #
Country's Mama Loc: Michigan
 
Janice wrote:
Country's Mama wrote:
Here is what I came up with after 131 shots. This focusing is a lot harder than it looks, never mind the figuring out the exposures.


I think you did pretty darn good. Only room to improve now! smiling I just love macro


Thank you. I think I am going to really like shooting Macro.

Reply
Feb 7, 2012 19:46:35   #
Janice Loc: Kentucky
 
Country's Mama wrote:
Janice wrote:
Country's Mama wrote:
Here is what I came up with after 131 shots. This focusing is a lot harder than it looks, never mind the figuring out the exposures.


I think you did pretty darn good. Only room to improve now! smiling I just love macro


Thank you. I think I am going to really like shooting Macro.


I love macro - but with my bridge camera I don't think I can shoot true macro

Reply
Feb 11, 2012 05:51:45   #
pgr Loc: Alabama
 
Nice pics :)

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2012 09:32:56   #
Country's Mama Loc: Michigan
 
pgl wrote:
Nice pics :)


Thank you.

Reply
Feb 11, 2012 10:38:56   #
rayford2 Loc: New Bethlehem, PA
 
Janice wrote:
Country's Mama wrote:
Janice wrote:
Country's Mama wrote:
Here is what I came up with after 131 shots. This focusing is a lot harder than it looks, never mind the figuring out the exposures.


I think you did pretty darn good. Only room to improve now! smiling I just love macro


Thank you. I think I am going to really like shooting Macro.


I love macro - but with my bridge camera I don't think I can shoot true macro


Hello, Janice.
I too have a bridge camera, a Panasonic FZ-50, that has many of the functions of a DSLR. It's limitations include a fixed f/2.8 35-400mm (35mm equiv) lens, a smaller sensor and a host of other handicaps.
I love photography but I have to live within my financial means without using credit cards or hocking the car.

So I purchased some useful additions that screw onto the lens to expand my options. Among them was a set of Vivitar close up attachments and a set of Vivitar filters which included a circular polarizer (CPL). I only use the CPL and the UV (lens protection).
I guess I've spent about $150 for accessories to my $200 camera and I'm having a hey-day with it. By no means does this imply they're as good as the accessories available to a DSLR user, but they work well.
Since I don't expect to be enlarging anything over 8 x 10 or cropping down to the extreme magnification I'm happy with what I have for now.
I would never attempt to play down DSLR's, only a fool would try that. And I certainly wouldn't try to compete with many of the UHH posters that have years of experience and the equipment to back it up.
As I see it, I'm happy I have the versatility now to take reasonable images...which is better than a cell phone camera, or worse yet, NO camera at all.
.....without breaking my bank account.

Reply
Feb 11, 2012 10:47:50   #
rayford2 Loc: New Bethlehem, PA
 
Country's Mama wrote:
Here is what I came up with after 131 shots. This focusing is a lot harder than it looks, never mind the figuring out the exposures.


You're doing great CM, my novice point of view. Close-up and macro is a bit harder than one would expect, if they never tried it.

Reply
Feb 11, 2012 23:13:05   #
Janice Loc: Kentucky
 
rayford2 wrote:
I too have a bridge camera, a Panasonic FZ-50, that has many of the functions of a DSLR. It's limitations include a fixed f/2.8 35-400mm (35mm equiv) lens, a smaller sensor and a host of other handicaps.
I love photography but I have to live within my financial means without using credit cards or hocking the car.

So I purchased some useful additions that screw onto the lens to expand my options. Among them was a set of Vivitar close up attachments and a set of Vivitar filters which included a circular polarizer (CPL). I only use the CPL and the UV (lens protection).
I guess I've spent about $150 for accessories to my $200 camera and I'm having a hey-day with it. By no means does this imply they're as good as the accessories available to a DSLR user, but they work well.
Since I don't expect to be enlarging anything over 8 x 10 or cropping down to the extreme magnification I'm happy with what I have for now.
I would never attempt to play down DSLR's, only a fool would try that. And I certainly wouldn't try to compete with many of the UHH posters that have years of experience and the equipment to back it up.
As I see it, I'm happy I have the versatility now to take reasonable images...which is better than a cell phone camera, or worse yet, NO camera at all.
.....without breaking my bank account.
I too have a bridge camera, a Panasonic FZ-50, tha... (show quote)


rayford - I am in the same boat with you - low budget, sometimes no budget. Canon offers some filters and a wide-angle screw-on lens for my camera, but I haven't had the means to purchase those yet.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2012 01:47:59   #
rayford2 Loc: New Bethlehem, PA
 
Janice wrote:
rayford2 wrote:
I too have a bridge camera, a Panasonic FZ-50, that has many of the functions of a DSLR. It's limitations include a fixed f/2.8 35-400mm (35mm equiv) lens, a smaller sensor and a host of other handicaps.
I love photography but I have to live within my financial means without using credit cards or hocking the car.

So I purchased some useful additions that screw onto the lens to expand my options. Among them was a set of Vivitar close up attachments and a set of Vivitar filters which included a circular polarizer (CPL). I only use the CPL and the UV (lens protection).
I guess I've spent about $150 for accessories to my $200 camera and I'm having a hey-day with it. By no means does this imply they're as good as the accessories available to a DSLR user, but they work well.
Since I don't expect to be enlarging anything over 8 x 10 or cropping down to the extreme magnification I'm happy with what I have for now.
I would never attempt to play down DSLR's, only a fool would try that. And I certainly wouldn't try to compete with many of the UHH posters that have years of experience and the equipment to back it up.
As I see it, I'm happy I have the versatility now to take reasonable images...which is better than a cell phone camera, or worse yet, NO camera at all.
.....without breaking my bank account.
I too have a bridge camera, a Panasonic FZ-50, tha... (show quote)


rayford - I am in the same boat with you - low budget, sometimes no budget. Canon offers some filters and a wide-angle screw-on lens for my camera, but I haven't had the means to purchase those yet.
quote=rayford2 I too have a bridge camera, a Pana... (show quote)


The big challenge is to find accessories that have reasonable quality. There are tons of junk batteries, chargers and accessories on Ebay, many are mailed from China or some other country.
Buying a junk filter or external accessory would prove to be a disappointment. But using junk electrical devices on your camera can prove to be fatal, especially cheap chargers and flash units that can overload the camera's electrical limits. Cheap batteries have a bad track record for longevity.
If it's electrical stay with the camera maker's accessories or get a name brand item from the major camera stores.

Reply
Feb 12, 2012 03:52:38   #
Janice Loc: Kentucky
 
rayford2 wrote:
The big challenge is to find accessories that have reasonable quality. There are tons of junk batteries, chargers and accessories on Ebay, many are mailed from China or some other country.
Buying a junk filter or external accessory would prove to be a disappointment. But using junk electrical devices on your camera can prove to be fatal, especially cheap chargers and flash units that can overload the camera's electrical limits. Cheap batteries have a bad track record for longevity.
If it's electrical stay with the camera maker's accessories or get a name brand item from the major camera stores.
The big challenge is to find accessories that have... (show quote)


Thank you for these words of wisdom! :thumbup: :-) appreciate it

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.