Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Is it worth it to upgrade?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Apr 9, 2014 09:28:34   #
bweber Loc: Newton, MA
 
I agree with those he suggest that you wait. The upgrade will not help you take better pictures or learn your art. I suspect that there is no picture you cannot take with your current camera that you be able to take with the upgrade. Save your money and if you want to upgrade, get better lenses. It is likely that you will want to upgrade in a more significant manner once you have put your current camera through its passes. You may even want to a full frame camera.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 11:10:46   #
LyneLa Mesa
 
I have a D5100 and continually wonder if I should upgrade. I am slowly learning about what I can do with the camera. I am getting closer to mastering the beast. I see people at the camera shows and hear about what others have here and think I should upgrade body and lens, but can't decide what I want. I keep taking pictures and improving. I am still aquiring some of the basic equipment such as a tripod, bag, vest, strap, etc. Once I get everything for this camera and learn it thoroughly, I may be ready to buy something new and start over again. Right now I would be throwing money around on things I really don't know enough about. I decided to wait to see where I am going as a photographer, how much time I will invest, and where my travels take me. Right now I am taking amazing pictures I never thought I could do. My biggest challenge is having the time to get out and shoot.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 11:16:40   #
photon56 Loc: North America
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Hi fellow hoggers..I bought a nikon 3200 a few months back, and I'm wondering if it was a dumb move. I'm still a LONG way from mastering this camera, but from what I've been reading here it seems I should have gotten a better body, and have been reading a lot about the 5300 & 7100 cameras. What I'm wondering is , is it worth upgrading to something like the 7100 ? Is there a noticeable difference in picture quality, and will my lenses from the 3200 work on it? I realize it's as much the person using it as the equipment in many cases but there comes a point where equipment matters too. My plan is to try and learn on what I have but want to be able to grow into it as well...
Hi fellow hoggers..I bought a nikon 3200 a few mon... (show quote)


Master the D3200 before making the next jump. When it starts to limit you from taking the type of photos that you are interested in, then take a serious look at an upgrade.

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2014 12:59:27   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Hi fellow hoggers..I bought a nikon 3200 a few months back, and I'm wondering if it was a dumb move. I'm still a LONG way from mastering this camera, but from what I've been reading here it seems I should have gotten a better body, and have been reading a lot about the 5300 & 7100 cameras. What I'm wondering is , is it worth upgrading to something like the 7100 ? Is there a noticeable difference in picture quality, and will my lenses from the 3200 work on it? I realize it's as much the person using it as the equipment in many cases but there comes a point where equipment matters too. My plan is to try and learn on what I have but want to be able to grow into it as well...
Hi fellow hoggers..I bought a nikon 3200 a few mon... (show quote)

I'm siding with amehta. You haven't given us an indication of your experience, or what your issues are with the D3200 (perhaps you've addressed these elsewhere). My refurbished D5000 came with a 234-page manual. I'm still not familiar with all the features, but then, I don't use all the features, and probably never will. I'm pretty solid now with the ones I usually use. It seems to me that the question boils down to whether you're just not familiar enough with your camera to get what it can deliver, or whether you think a different camera body might (magically?) let you accomplish more. My motivation to upgrade from my previous camera was that I wanted to shoot camera raw, which has definitely opened up opportunities for me, and I wanted to be able to have good control over manual focus, a definite weakness in my previous camera. In other words, I had outgrown the camera. In my mind, that's the time to upgrade.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 13:05:40   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
amehta wrote:
I'm going to go against the flow (as usual). I think it makes sense for you to use the D3200 until you feel it is limiting you. The D7100 does not have significantly better image quality than the D3200. It's main advantage is operational speed. When you answer one of these questions with "yes" three times, then it's time to upgrade:
* Do I have to use a menu to change something I do often, and with the D7100 I would not need to go to a menu?
* Do I want to do something to take a cool photograph, but the D3200 does not have the capability to do it, while the D7100 does?

The other reason to wait is that you just missed the latest round of rebates and discount, so the D7100 is close to it's highest price. It may be discounted later this year, especially if a D7200 or D9300 are released.
I'm going to go against the flow (as usual). I th... (show quote)


I think amehta nailed this on the first page.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 13:32:18   #
wsherman Loc: New York
 
The obsession will never end. I too believe you should stay with your camera until you learn as much about it as you can. Then you may surprise yourself and want to reach beyond the 7100. The sky is the limit. Be patient and enjoy your photography experience. Cameras are only getting better. There will be many to choose from in the future.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 14:15:38   #
wings42 Loc: San Diego, CA
 
pat5200 wrote:
Wingnut, I have the same question about my D5200. To limit an additional post would it be OK to include the D5200 with your post? Thanks for your consideration.


My D5100 is in it's Nikon case the past two years. The D7000 is my daily companion. It's a joy to use even though it is quite a bit heavier and doesn't have a movable LCD screen. The added buttons and knobs make all the difference enabling quick and easy adjustments as you're shooting without going into the menus. Also, I have big hands and the D7000 fits them better than the D5100.

You'll also want to get a better padded camera strap because of the added weight, especially if you use a heavy lens (my walk around lens for birds, what's on the camera 90% of the time is a heavy Nikon 70-300). I'm quite happy with my OP/TECH Pro strap at http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00092KD9C/ref=pe_385040_30332190_pe_175190_21431760_M3T1_ST1_dp_1 .

I intend to get a D7X00 when my D7000 wears out. No need to change until then!

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2014 14:27:13   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
Thanks..pretty much found out what I wanted..the 3200, though not much more than "entry" level, seems to be a pretty nice camera..if I ever do get it figured out, I don't think it would be a bad move to upgrade.meanwhile, if I do come across a good deal, maybe I will get it sooner, but I want to make sure it's what I want, as I don't want to KEEP upgrading..I guess what I'm saying is I want to make sure the 7100 or whatever I decide on will be the LAST time I upgrade the body..at this point in time i may not be knowledgable enough to know exactly what i do want, but I do know an upgrade is in my future..as it is I still second guess nikon over canon but now that I have a couple lenses I guess there's no turning back...thanks everybody for your input!
Thanks..pretty much found out what I wanted..the 3... (show quote)

Since you want to do only one more upgrade (though really I don't see that being the case either ;-) ), you need to know both why you are upgrading and why you are upgrading to a particular camera. It does not seem that you really know either of these answers right now. When you do know the answers, your post won't be, "Should I do it?", it will be, "Now it's time!" :-)

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 14:33:45   #
Straightshooter Loc: Edmonton AB
 
LFingar wrote:
I've done a bit of carpentry. Built my own house and garage. When I started out I didn't buy cheap nailguns because I had never used them before. I bought all Bostitch. They'll last me the rest of my lifetime. I've always found that buying the best quality, most capable tools I can afford is the cheapest way to go. Same thing with cameras. If you have a goal as to where you want to eventually be then buy with that in mind and forget the intermediate steps. That the 7100 and even the 3200 are more capable at this point then you are is a meaningless distinction. The vast majority of cameras are more capable then the people who own them. Including most of the people who tell you to only progress in small steps. Learning how to use a camera is the easy part. It's simply a machine. You read, ask advice, and practice. Learning how to be a good photographer is the hard part. Your finances and retirement are your business, not the business of anyone on this forum. If you want a better camera and can afford it then buy it. That's what you work for.
I've done a bit of carpentry. Built my own house a... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 16:04:33   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
wingnut1956 wrote:
I kind of expected that for an answer. .I guess I should have researched things more before getting the 3200, but it seemed way more advanced than my old d70s..Is there a noticeable difference in picture quality, and is it a hard camera to learn to use?

Picture quality will be a matter of technique, the quality of the lens, and the skill of the photographer. The D7100 will offer you more options, but eventually you'll want to start spending money on better lenses too.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 16:41:53   #
rick.harvey Loc: Invercargill, New Zealand
 
I would respectfully suggest that you read this, which was posted a day or two ago by raleigh:

I am a photographer. I make photographs. I do not take them, shoot them, capture them, or snap them. I do what I do to see the world differently and to show others what I see and feel. And yes, it really did look like that when seen through my eyes, mind, and heart. The tools of my craft are a camera and a lens, but the tools of my art are my passion and vision. Film or digital. It's not how we make our photographs that matters, but that we make them. The gear I have is good enough, my camera doesn't have to be made recently for me to photograph the present moment. The brand of my camera is irrelevant to the pursuit of beauty and authenticity in my work. Megapixels are no way to measure a photograph. I want deeper photographs, honest photographs that are alive. Not merely really big or really sharp. I hope the legacy I create with my work will be judged not by how many photographs I made in this lifetime, but what those few magic frames do in the hearts and minds of others. Comparing myself to others or them to me, is a waste of my creative efforts and makes it harder to see the light, chase the wonder and do my work. There is too much to see and to create to waste these too few moments. Art is not a competition, but a gift. I believe photographs can change the world because they have done so for me. I believe photography opens my eyes to a deeper life, one that recognizes moments and lives them deeper for being present in them. To be an amateur means to be a lover. Professional or not, I want to do this for the rest of my life as an amateur.
FOR THE LOVE OF THE PHOTOGRAPH

I found it to be a most enlightening and re-motivating statement.

Cheers, Rick

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2014 17:03:20   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
To be clear, raleigh posted the quote. He did not write it. Give credit where it is due. A. Buisse was the author.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 18:16:22   #
rick.harvey Loc: Invercargill, New Zealand
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
To be clear, raleigh posted the quote. He did not write it. Give credit where it is due. A. Buisse was the author.


Of course - thanks for that correction. I certainly didn't mean to imply otherwise. I was more taken by the message.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 18:25:55   #
One Camera One Lens Loc: Traveling
 
this message is what photography is REALLY all about, it couldn't have been said better unless our egos get in the way and we feel we have something to prove. We have nothing to prove, only to create, thanks for sharing, we ALL need this....

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 18:52:22   #
wings42 Loc: San Diego, CA
 
One Camera One Lens wrote:
this message is what photography is REALLY all about, it couldn't have been said better unless our egos get in the way and we feel we have something to prove. We have nothing to prove, only to create, thanks for sharing, we ALL need this....


This thread is about changing cameras or not. A person started this thread stating that they were fighting their camera and finding it uncomfortable to hold and use (Nikon D5200). In the experience of many in this forum, me included, another camera (Nikon D7000 series) is a joy to hold and use and makes it easy to do what they want it to do.

I'd say change. The money the new camera will cost will be spent anyway on something or other. It's not about ego or proving anything, it's all about the joy and satisfaction one gets in doing what they enjoy.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.