Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon or Cannon ?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Dec 12, 2013 20:36:10   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
Bridges wrote:
Back about 25 years ago photography was a hobby, but also photo equipment. I would buy, trade, sell, etc. One day I had a bunch of equipment on a table and a gentleman came along and looked at an assortment of lenses, of which there were some Olympus lenses. He related this story to me: For years he had worked as an engineer for GE. They were just developing circuit boards and the way they did that was to take a photograph and somehow use the negative to etch the boards. He said they tested the lenses of all the major camera companies and found Olympus lenses to resolve the best. Despite this they ended up going with Nikon -- the reason -- the Olympus bodies weren't as rigid and the thin-metal back of the OM series of cameras allowed the film plate to move 1/2500th of an inch and that wasn't critical enough. The film plate on the Nikon was rock solid though. I've always considered Olympus lenses equal to any on the market including the elite group you listed above. I've wished they would go into making 3rd party lenses for other companies like Contax is doing to some extent.
Back about 25 years ago photography was a hobby, b... (show quote)


I have an Olympus 75mm f1.8 which is the best M4/3 lens available. But just like all brands they have excellent lenses, good lenses and mediocre lenses.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 08:47:15   #
Tomcat5133 Loc: Gladwyne PA
 
Hello. I have 2 Nikon D800's. It does have a cold look. And the Canons are over warm and softer. The video out of the 800 is sharp and have grown to like it. Color reading is problematic. I also like very much where Sony is going. Have the NEX-30, NEX-7,RX100 II and still have Panasonic HMC150.
It seems this is a firmware battle. Good glass is important but unless we are shooting features do we need a 30k box of them.
Work with shooter Red Epic kit. That and the Alex have become the movie maker. Love DSLR's--but for video unless you have time cumbersome. Still great still machines. I have been shooting with the tiny RX100 II. Actually like it best. NEX-7 with good lens is really low profile high quality. So what I am saying is if Nikon and Canon (good pro video overpriced) the other guys are going to take over. I do come from years of Nikons and will
always think they wanted to make the best cameras and lens.
Good luck Tom

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 10:07:55   #
oldmalky Loc: West Midlands,England.
 
I have Sony and until a few days ago had never handled any other make but as i said until a few days ago and then i held a Nikon 3100, if that camera had been shown to me i would have been a nikon shooter now.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.