Opinion about buying a NIkon or Canon
Dec 11, 2011 19:27:47 #
I like what CaptainC says. But in regards to "Sports photography", I have my reservation. In most of the pro sports events I go to every year(Pro Bowl, Vanns Triple Crown), majority of what I saw here in Hawaii was Cannon white lenses. Several pro had disclosed to me their loyalty to Cannon is not just for the telephoto lens but also stronger capability to send their picture wireless(they like it better than Nikon). But again without actually using it, I can only relate their opinion here. I totally agree on the issue of flash. Nothing come close to Nikon SB line of flashes. Love to have a few more, if only my Epson printer can print cash. lol
CaptainC wrote:
I think this is question to which there is no righ... (show quote)
Dec 12, 2011 05:56:14 #
Actually there is a third choice that nobody seems to take into account. The Fuji Pro S series uses Nikon optics and their "Super ccd" is one of the best for color rendition. Fuji is one of the most used cameras in the studio. They also have a well built sturdy body and easy-to-use controls. Do a web search and read some reviews.
Dec 12, 2011 06:00:01 #
Am wondering why you would ask such a question if you have the experience you say you have ? Most of the cameras are up to what you want to do. I shoot both Canon and Nikon. Canon 5D MarkII and Nikon D300...no problems with either
Dec 12, 2011 06:20:41 #
I know it's easier to ask and receive but this Q isn't easy to answer. If it were me and I had a question as serious as your requirements you better do the old "T" chart of what you need/ want and go to Popular Photography's archives and start the laborious task of evaluation. PP does some in depth evaluations which I believe few others can do. I have been amazed at the depth of research their capable of. I cannot put a stamp of approval on them because I don't have the expertise to do such. So my opinion is worth at least ten thousand dollars, whoops.
Dec 12, 2011 06:43:45 #
No. Go Nikon and for what you do, the single macro 105mm f2.8 will be the only lens you'll need.
Dec 12, 2011 06:51:18 #
moroeder wrote:
PP does some in depth evaluations which I believe few others can do. I have been amazed at the depth of research their capable of. I cannot put a stamp of approval on them because I don't have the expertise to do such. So my opinion is worth at least ten thousand dollars, whoops.
I think dpreview has the best reviews on the net and in their magazine.
Dec 12, 2011 06:58:13 #
nikon_jon wrote:
Actually there is a third choice that nobody seems to take into account. The Fuji Pro S series uses Nikon optics and their "Super ccd" is one of the best for color rendition. Fuji is one of the most used cameras in the studio. They also have a well built sturdy body and easy-to-use controls. Do a web search and read some reviews.
Good point, Jon!
However, Ican't imagine a camera with more bang for the buck than the D700.
Especially when coupled with it's traveling sister, the P7100.
(Are we hi-jacking the thread here?)
Dec 12, 2011 07:04:40 #
1eyedjack wrote:
If you are in the business you should not have to ask that question.
I was taken by her willingness to ask questions!
Dec 12, 2011 07:58:59 #
I like the Ford Chevy reference, but I have been using Canon for years and initially it was due to the lens compatibility. I had a Canon SLR and when I started my digital quest I felt it was just a natural progression. I have heard a couple of things...the Canon is metal...the Nikon is a high grade plastic. When you shift from hot to cold weather the Nikon reacts differently due to the plastic...the Canon fogs up in the humid climate. I learned this when I went to the islands...it was a minor issue, but it happened. I am still a Canon user and will likely be one for life. I have the 7D and what a great camera...and I have all the lenses...and they all work.
Dec 12, 2011 08:02:31 #
I agree
1eyedjack wrote:
If you are in the business you should not have to ask that question.
Dec 12, 2011 08:19:26 #
Wabbit
Loc: Arizona Desert
topdoghawaii wrote:
Well the op is not shooting sports anyway so all this is a moot point.I like what CaptainC says. But in regards to "... (show quote)
Dec 12, 2011 08:25:30 #
I have been taking pictures from some 32 years using primarily Cannon but some Olympus, Panasonic, and even some Kodak so I am no purest, just enjoy the doing. This forum is a joy for me in that I read the snap back comments from, I guess, some really knowledgable folks but I appreciate those who take the time to share their experience and patience. This is a forum for learning, and there are other avenues for those who have a low tolerance for those with less than expert skill sets.
I have learned that, reading the reviews from the expert reviewers can be helpful, but the bottom line is that this forum seems to show me is that the feel of a camera in my hand and personal experience we each have is a key. The customer service offered by some brands to help install firmware or trouble shoot is way too scarce so we really benefit from the collective skills of those willing to share. A sincere thank you- and I am learning to tolerate the occasional bark of a response.
I have learned that, reading the reviews from the expert reviewers can be helpful, but the bottom line is that this forum seems to show me is that the feel of a camera in my hand and personal experience we each have is a key. The customer service offered by some brands to help install firmware or trouble shoot is way too scarce so we really benefit from the collective skills of those willing to share. A sincere thank you- and I am learning to tolerate the occasional bark of a response.
Dec 12, 2011 08:40:20 #
senad55verizon.net
Loc: Milford, NJ
To do the kind of stuff you do, think medium format digitals like Mamiya or Hasselblad. You'll spend a lot of dollars but the images will be spectacular.
Dec 12, 2011 08:42:33 #
I shoot a lot of sports stuff and it takes a little tuning and trial and error to get the correct settings...but the Canon 7D makes it very easy...especially with the ISO capability...
Dec 12, 2011 08:43:18 #
Wabbit
Loc: Arizona Desert
mariamaria wrote:
Maria, just ignore the stupid comments, every forum gets them. I'm all for Nikon SLR's including glass, but you can succeed with any brand you choose. This is my FIRST POST... and in response to Mr. 1e... (show quote)
I think the Nikon flash is number one, always felt that way and I'm not alone. But opinions vary like Chevy vs Ford, a never ending debate. And just like Chrysler enters the equation you're gonna hear the name Fuji pop up sooner or later.
You already have two nice pieces of glass. If I was doing what you are I'd go full frame with a Nikon D700. I have and use a D70s, D5100, and D7000 along with lots of glass from my film days.
If I bought the D5100 first I wouldn't have purchased the D7000. The 5100 is lighter and has a articulating LCD which I think is the best thing since cream cheese.
You need to hold the camera in your hands to see if it talks to you, that's when you'll know.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.