Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens choice
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 31, 2013 23:19:12   #
Sneidley Loc: Goodyear, AZ
 
I've picked up a 70-300 lens, and now I need the lower range ens to replace my kit lens for a Nikon D5100.

I've found a 24-70 and a 16-85, both for under $400. Both are VR lens, and both are 3.5-5.6.

I'm leaning towards the 16-85 because of the 16, and that it would/could? Be a better walk around lens.

Any reason I should stay away from either?

Thanks
Steve

Reply
May 31, 2013 23:27:50   #
NoSocks Loc: quonochontaug, rhode island
 
Who makes the lenses?

Reply
May 31, 2013 23:29:11   #
Sneidley Loc: Goodyear, AZ
 
quonnie wrote:
Who makes the lenses?


Sorry.
Both Nikon

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2013 00:07:39   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Sneidley wrote:
Sorry.
Both Nikon




The 24-70 is not very wide on a 5100.
The only 24-70 I'm familiar with is a 2.8 non- vr.
You will probably be happier with the 16-85, a very good performer on a DX camera.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 00:11:21   #
Sneidley Loc: Goodyear, AZ
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The 24-70 is not very wide on a 5100.
You will probably be happier with the 16-85, a very good performer on a DX camera.


It's not the 2.8, it's a 3.5

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 00:14:21   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
I agree with GoofyNewfie I think the 16-85 will give you more flexibility at the wide/short end.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 00:17:40   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Pepper wrote:
I agree with GoofyNewfie I think the 16-85 will give you more flexibility at the wide/short end.


I have a 16-85 and it is a verrry good lens.
Light-weight and sharp.

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2013 01:08:02   #
Sneidley Loc: Goodyear, AZ
 
Thanks for the help. I did make one mistake, it is a 18-70 3.5- lens.

I went with the 16-85.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 04:18:51   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
I would go for the 16-85, very good lens and it compliments you 70 - 300 range wise.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 04:33:30   #
Bret Loc: Dayton Ohio
 
Do you plan on going to a full frame body anytime soon?

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 07:48:51   #
WOOTTEE Loc: plymouth Ma.
 
I have both 70-300 + 16-85 and both are my carry@ lens(es)

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2013 08:46:34   #
IBE
 
Try the Sigma 17-70. Great lens

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 10:53:58   #
Peter Boyd Loc: Blyth nr. Newcastle U.K.
 
IBE wrote:
Try the Sigma 17-70. Great lens


I agree - controls barrel distortion at the wide angle end very well.

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 12:44:39   #
Himat Loc: Toronto
 
Hi l am looking at 17- 70 sigma does this works on full
fram as for now l have D90 but may be in future l might go for D600 l would like some input
Thanks in advance

Reply
Jun 1, 2013 12:48:11   #
IBE
 
The one I have will not work on full frame sensors

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.