Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: lmTrying
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 149 next>>
Apr 19, 2024 20:54:17   #
dc3legs wrote:
The operating weight of a D10T is about 150,000 pounds.


Nine dual tired axles plus the heavy duty front axle makes this rig capable of hauling in excess 180,000 pounds combined truck and load weight. The blades are transported on another truck because they would otherwise be too wide. And depending on the destination, the cabs are taken off to reduce the load height. And sometimes the tracks to reduce width, height, and weight.

I would have to say that the truck and trailer weigh more than 15 tons. Taking off the blade, the ripper, cab and tracks brings the transport weight down to legal by special permit.
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 00:28:23   #
SteveLoker wrote:
After a LOT of research and planning, I was able to get these of the eclipse on 4/8/2024. I set up my camera (Canon 6D mark ii with a Canon 70-200 mark ii lens with an HD ND1000000 filter) on a tripod, set my intervalometer to 2:15 and was afraid the cloud cover would nerf the whole experience. I pointed at the sun and got nothing in the viewfinder. Put my Eclipse glasses back on, rechecked my "aim" and the clouds cleared enough to get lined up. I let the timer run and hit the button when I thought I "had something" usable. I only deleted 6 images from the batch or pre- and post-totality at 2:15 intervals. Then totality struck, I removed the filter and mashed away on the manual trigger- a lot. Total time in position was nearly 2 hours but I'm pretty happy with these.
I am playing around with a composite but these are my favorites so far.
These had minimal post. Just a couple ticks left or right here and there that enhanced in Adobe Camera Raw. I've found that starting in Bridge and doing most of the post in Camera Raw keeps me from going too far and ruining an otherwise good shot.
Hope you like these too.
After a LOT of research and planning, I was able t... (show quote)


Those are crazy wild!
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 00:23:50   #
ialvarez50 wrote:
Hello everyone, this is my secod total eclipse. Seven years ago Itravel to Saint Louis Mo., for that eclipse, this time to Indianapolis Indiana, all from Chicago.
The eclipse was espectacular and whete I was, it ladyed 4:12 seconds. I cannot wait for the next and travel to Europe.
These images are in sequence from the begining to the end. In the middle it is the moment that the sun disappeared, the middle at the highest intensity with radiation flares, and then the moment when the sun stared to reappeared. By the way, only on that shot I was able to capture what I think is a comet. You will not be able to see it in your phone.
Hello everyone, this is my secod total eclipse. Se... (show quote)


Now that is creative. And it would make a great po$ter.
Go to
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Apr 13, 2024 18:08:44   #
keithhmw wrote:
A golden sunset taking place along the coast in Melbourne Australia.


Yep! Hang it.
I'm willing to bet good money that a lot of people will line up to get copies.
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 18:05:45   #
Greg Brandt wrote:
This is my first attempt at creating a composite in Photoshop. Actually, I barely know how to use Photoshop (tend to use Lightroom more), I'm sure there are a lot of tools/tricks to do a better job than I managed (alignment was a pain and is not perfect for instance), but for a first try, it seems ok.


First time? I'd frame that sucker and hang it in a prominent place.
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 17:43:55   #
Jim Tonne wrote:
An image similar to this one was previously posted but not this one. This is a seriously-underexposed frame with poor lighting from that PlusX Archive of Olde, circa late 70s.


Shows you what I know, I thought you were going for that 'hi-key' thing.

Yes, she was a beautiful girl. Yes, I like the light against the dark of the cave walls. As for the exposure, ya know, I like that too.

Will she get colourized? If you do, I'm hoping you leave the A.I. out of it and do it manually.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 14:44:58   #
Just Fred wrote:
I'm on another trip now, with eleven others, and only one of them is carrying a DSLR (a Sony, but I don't know which model). Everyone else is using their phones. Of course, none of them has confessed to being a professional photographer, so their phones are serving them well.

As is mine. A very rainy day today in Wellington, New Zealand, and I don't have to worry about my lens getting spotted, fogged or water seeping into the camera body as I trek around (I'll post some photos when I've had a chance to offload them to my computer).
I'm on another trip now, with eleven others, and o... (show quote)


Hey Fred:

Glad to see you are still out there going!

Several years ago, i carried my DSLR around one of DWD's parks for an afternoon because I thought I wanted some better photos of something. I don't even remember what it was now. Eehh, no. From then on, I only carried my Canon XS710HS. Small, light, one heck of a zoom, and carries easily on my belt. Security doesn't even stop me. That big DSLR is not worth the effort.

Now, when I studied your cell phone photo, and I studied it very closely, I have to say that I have not seen any better photo taken of Machu Picchu. I found details that I have never seen in any other photo. Several years back, Google sent their mapping team and cameras to Machu Picchu and did an extensive photo survey of the entire main plaza. After studying the stonework in those photos for days, I decided that Machu Picchu has seen at least three different civilizations of stone builders, and that it has been there a whole lot longer than the learned archaeologists want to admit. Also, I'm willing to bet that all that stone was quarried from the actual site. What???? Why is that commons field so much lower than everything else? Where is the ridge??

I, and several others, am looking foreword to whatever photos you chose to post. The color is good, the focus is good, the exposure is good, the depth of field is good. In fact, they are all beyond good, way beyond. So, ignore Imagemaster and everyone else like him. Keep up the good work and keep posting. Please.
Go to
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Apr 12, 2024 13:17:43   #
Retired CPO wrote:
"Cool Water" by Sons of the Pioneers. 1959


Really!

Seemed to me I could remember playing that song on the 45 record player when we lived on the farm. We moved from there in June of '56 when I was five. Unless I find that old record I'll have to go with that.

Thanx for the trip down memory lane.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 11:34:40   #
Retired CPO wrote:
Memory like a steel trap!! Thanks IT!!


Hey Chief, can that steel trap remember the name of that group that recorded "Cool Water"? It's been buzzing though my brain since I found this thread. I'd even bet good money that the label on the record was dark blue, maybe Capitol Records. Not in my collection these days. Maybe buried in my sister's basement. But danged if I can remember the artist. Can you?
Go to
Apr 11, 2024 12:03:06   #
Delderby wrote:
My personal opinion is that it is high class photography of an architectural image.
I don't think in terms of "hard and fast rules" but it seems sensible to classify pictures by content, and buildings should, I think, have an overall classification of "Architecture" rather than grouping them into "Landscape" -along with pics of the Grand Canyon!


So architectural is a sub category of landscape?

I'm always looking for logical methods of organizing photos. Such as; shows: dog shows, car shows tractor shows, model shows. Course that gets confused with, cars: drag cars, custom cars, car shows, trucks in car shows, street machines, hot rods, etc.

Not that I have that many landscapes and architectural to worry about. Just picking a fellow hogger's brain. Thanks.
Go to
Apr 11, 2024 11:16:07   #
Retired CPO wrote:
Yep!


I was beginning to think I was the only one to remember that old cowboy song.
Go to
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Apr 11, 2024 01:22:30   #
joecichjr wrote:
I wanted someone to tell ME 😜


The thing after the the rolling pins looks like it could be a counter of some type or a calculator maybe.

The yellow, green, and red thing before the rolling pins I know I have seen before. Do you have photos that show more of those two items.
Go to
Apr 11, 2024 01:12:42   #
MrBob wrote:
Yeah, I can't believe you did 40 laps... I could only afford 8. WHAT a thrill though... Hardest part was getting in that window after having Colon surgery. Well worth it though.


Ouch! That's determination.
It was our 25th wedding anniversary, and we were kind of going all out. And at 57, I figured it was now or never. She wanted to go to Cirque de Soule. I wanted to drive a cup car. (We've been to Cirque at least three more times since. What an impressive show.) I had fun with those guys, even though I had them rolling their eyes at some of my comments. But I paid attention, and even bought a ride-along before my drive. I learned a lot. And even found smoother (faster) paths through the turns on my half hour trip to work and back when I got home. But the best thing was the conversation I had with my lead driver when he walked up to me before I left the showroom.

I hope you had as much fun as I did.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 10:30:53   #
joecichjr wrote:
Mine is downstairs 😀


Interesting use of a wine rack. But what the heck are the things before and after the rack? The one before looks kind of familiar, but I just can't place it.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 10:25:38   #
Longshadow wrote:

Don't yell at me, I didn't make it, I'm just the messenger.

I know, and the eclipse doesn't occur in a circle either.
I guess they didn't have a real long narrow plate.

Ever hear of poetic license?
img src="https://static.uglyhedgehog.com/images/s... (show quote)


Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 149 next>>
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.