Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: IBM
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 87 next>>
Jan 6, 2019 19:42:19   #
AzPicLady wrote:
That's a really nice shot, Regis. I like the interaction between them.


I missed that ?
Go to
Jan 6, 2019 19:35:49   #
Regis wrote:
I have no idea if they are mates. But, male and female Bald Eagles stay together until one dies.
Thank you very much, wdross.


There is a mail and a girl here.
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 17:01:41   #
I can look at it for two seconds. Max , then I'm gone
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 17:00:12   #
I can look at it for two seconds. Max , then I'm gone
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 16:47:55   #
Wanderer2 wrote:
No, no joke. It's all yours. I won't be able to get it in the mail until later this week. I do have your address recorded and agree that it would be a good idea to delete it from your post. Merry Christmas - hope it's not too cold in Duluth.


Who ever pays for the cost of mailing it is the one who gets burnt the most ,it's not worth the cost of mailing it
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 16:30:10   #
Cany143 wrote:
I just love those posts that have titles that include words or phrases like 'just' or 'a few from' or 'move along, nuthin' much to see here but....' They make my expectations of seeing something truly exceptional leap off my computer screen, of seeing something that is... well..... beautilicious or sinnificant or whatever. So to that end, here's Just Some Tree's [sic] 'N Rocks 'N Things from yesterday's stroll in the park. It was a nice little stroll, though, so there was that. And the sun did eventually come out, too.

<edit:> Oh! And Merry Christmas, too!
I just love those posts that have titles that incl... (show quote)


Nice , it's rare to see a group of keepers on this channel U.H.H.
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 16:18:44   #
Ok think I'll stay with my 300 max Nikon zoom
Go to
Dec 8, 2018 13:41:02   #
Pin tail
Go to
Dec 8, 2018 13:40:33   #
lrjames wrote:
BIF (birds in flight) photos give you a completely different prospective of birds as well as being very challenging.
Thanks for looking at my photos.
Larry James


It's been many years since I hunted and ate these , are they green wing teal . Widgen, or pigtail.
Go to
Dec 7, 2018 14:59:52   #
One Rude Dawg wrote:
Not only is the bullet deadlier than the blade, it can reach out much further than arm's length. Guns and knives really cannot be compared with each other.

B.S. A knife is just as deadly as a firearm, different applications, one is not really better than the other, just different. Apples and oranges.



Only if the firearm has no shells in its chamber , or if it's a hunting rifle ,you can use it as a club,in that situation I would prefer the empty
Rifle over the knife , as long as it's not a Samaria sword .
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 23:23:40   #
None of the knives I buy are confiscated ,they are just so dull and no sharpness left at all they think it's less costly to rebuy
Than pay $4 for a resharpen , why not buy a new one , instead there good for about a year tell you have put a complete new edge onthem
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 23:02:17   #
Jerrin1 wrote:
I bought the Hikkor 200 - 500mm f5.6 over the Sigma and Tamron 150 - 600mm offerings and never regretted it for a moment. I used mine on a Nikon D500 and it matched beautifully. It seemed to snatch birds out of the sky when I was using it for birds in flight - even better than my Nikkor 300mm f4 PF ED VR + TC14EIII. I preferred my 200 - 500mm to my Canon 100 - 400mm f4.5/5.6L IS II, which I used with a Canon 7D mark II. Though I no longer shoot Nikon, I still regard the Nikkor 200 - 500mm as a cracking lens 0withexcellent AF and optical performance. Take a look at UHH member Steve Perry's review on YouTube.
I bought the Hikkor 200 - 500mm f5.6 over the Sigm... (show quote)


And you will find that if you took sigma , tamron and Nikon ,all the equivalent lenis and shot the same subject, you will see that Nikon
Is better than the rest ,I have seen many such shots ,and I have not seen any tamron, sigma or any other lens out side of Germany
Swiss and a couple others who beat Nikon and canon, but the cost of such lens is $2500 Or more. You get what you pay for
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 22:13:33   #
Gene51 wrote:
The Nikon is sharper, and may have an edge in build quality. But neither are intended for use in harsh conditions. For the same price as the Nikon you can get the Tamron 150-600 G2 which is sharper that the Nikon, moisture sealed, and a 20% longer in focal length, and if you decide you want to use it on a tripod, it's foot is already equipped with an Arca-Swiss compatible dovetail.

I looked a the Nikon, the original Tamron and the two Sigmas - the C and the Sport - and found the Sport sharper and better built, with the Nikon a close second optically. I've since spent some time with a single copy of the G2 and found it to be every bit as sharp as the Sport, and almost 2 lbs lighter.
The Nikon is sharper, and may have an edge in buil... (show quote)


Sure that's all fine and dandy , but it is the thing that all these companies are doing trying to match Nikon and canon.but they are
Still missing the mark , I personal like the canon Nikon better in terms of finished products ,it is heads above what what the bargain
Lenses provide , there is a popular eagle shooter here who used a sigma it was one of there topmodels ,it wasent to long before he
Switched to a Nikon, and his sigma were not to bad. The colour is also better with Nikon or canon
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 21:48:06   #
IBM wrote:
Oh yea and your pictures have improved immensely, since your first efforts ,, good showing For


That's Foss foss. Dam spell checker how do I get rid of it ,
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 21:45:16   #
fosgood11 wrote:
yes always


Oh yea and your pictures have improved immensely, since your first efforts ,, good showing For
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 87 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.