Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: leftj
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 381 next>>
Apr 19, 2024 10:20:59   #
Novots wrote:
Wow, this is tempting.


Not at $500 over list.
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 21:45:49   #
Bridges wrote:
I avoid E-bay because of a situation my daughter experienced. She sold someone a pair of expensive sneakers for half the price of new -- they were in fact new. She bought them and decided she could live without them. The buyer then decided they didn't want them and lied about the listing. They claimed the shoes they wanted were for a man when my daughter's ad clearly stated they were women's. E-bay will make you negotiate with the other party before they will make good on the problem. After going back and forth a couple of times with the buyer, my daughter was able to get the shoes back but was out something like 18.00 for shipping and insurance. E-bay was fine with that although my daughter was the loser. You may get satisfaction from E-bay but it might not be 100% satisfaction and it might take a month to settle the situation.
I avoid E-bay because of a situation my daughter e... (show quote)


She could have avoided all that by simply returning them to where she bought them.
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 08:47:57   #
TRAVLR38 wrote:
I am interested in purchasing a used camera using E-Bay. I have never used the site before, and have several questions.
1. How do you know the item is actually as described?
2. If necessary, is there a way to send the item back and get a refund?
3. Are there any possible problems in dealing with E-Bay?
4. If so, how avoid them?
If any of you who have dealt with E-Bay have any advice, I would be pleased to hear it.
Thanks in advance.


You should go to eBay and read their policies.
Go to
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Apr 3, 2024 08:59:13   #
peterjoseph wrote:
I always prefer a camera on a strap and on my shoulders. I feel it is safe and convenient too.
I have seen some carry the camera even DSLRs in their hand when on a shoot.
Which do you prefer?
Peter


I prefer no shoulder strap. Maybe a wrist strap sometimes.
Go to
Mar 23, 2024 10:19:26   #
JD750 wrote:
I have asked myself this recently and I am reading a book that among other things, promises to “ and finish with how to find your purpose in photography.”

That is a bold claim and something I have asked myself more than once. There is no single answer of course, because it is subjective subject.

So I am curious, what do readers here say in response to “What is your purpose in photography?“


Mine is to have fun.
Go to
Mar 19, 2024 08:48:51   #
anhmydo1941 wrote:
Do you have any experience with this store ? Do we need to stay away from it ? I learned this shop stay on the market for a pretty long time ."Grey market or bad quality products?
Thank you for your suggestions.


Are you just trying to repeat a worthless thread? Your questions indicate you already know the answers.
Go to
Feb 24, 2024 10:27:49   #
Blenheim Orange wrote:
I watched a video on YouTube tonight of colorized Civil War era photos. Most of the photos I have seen many, many times over the years, and I am amazed by the difference it makes to see them in color.

I'll put the link in the next post.


What difference does it make?
Go to
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Feb 21, 2024 09:14:52   #
Warhorse wrote:
Just this morning I was made aware that the new Fuji X100VI is going to be released 2/28/24.

Priced at $1599 in black or silver. I am very interested, as I wanted a new X100V for some time, but never could find it new.


Better get your pre-order in now.
Go to
Feb 18, 2024 09:55:53   #
JZA B1 wrote:
I prefer to keep mine looking "natural". As if there wasn't any post-processing or editing done. So even when I do heavy post-processing, I still do it in a way that looks like any alterations are minimal.

But sometimes I see really good pictures that seem almost way too over-processed, yet still look amazing. I could never achieve that. Whenever I try going heavy on the sliders and masks, I end up with some cartoon-looking abomination.

So for me, I go with the natural look because I just don't know how to make good-looking heavily processed images. Not because I'm opposed to editing/processing or want to preserve the "natural look" or anything like that.

Do you think there are a lot of people like that? Those who only do "natural look" because they can't do the heavily-processed one and make it look good?
I prefer to keep mine looking "natural".... (show quote)


Subtle
Go to
Jan 21, 2024 09:22:39   #
paulrnzpn wrote:
Six more from this set coming soon.
Comments welcome.


Pure Beauty!
Go to
Jan 17, 2024 09:03:37   #
I'll bet that water was very cold. I'm getting goosebumps!
Go to
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Jan 7, 2024 09:50:07   #
Stats153 wrote:
I found a lens I've wanted on MPB, at a good price. Seeing lots of positive reviews (including here on UHH) I decided to make the purchase.

I called MPB, asking to place an order over the phone. Told I can't do it, must use web. Ok.

So I placed my order on the web, then got phone call for "security clearance." Fine, I can understand that: it was a big ticket item, and nobody wants to be scammed.

After a few legitimate questions (credit card, shipping address, etc.) they asked if I was an amateur or a professional. Seemed odd, but I played along. Next, what would I be using the lens for? Did I have other Nikon equipment? Had I ever used any other camera brands? I answered, but said I found the questions intrusive, probably more for marketing than for security.

The order went through, but then 3 days later I got an email saying the order was cancelled because it had "not passed our security checks process." I called, and was told that while my credit card had been approved for the purchase, they wouldn't accept my order. I asked to speak to a manager, and was told none were available. They'd get back to me. 3 hours later, no call.

So I've bought the lens from KEH -- slightly more expensive, but no hassles, and much better return policy.
I found a lens I've wanted on MPB, at a good price... (show quote)


I suspect something is missing from this tale of woe.
Go to
Jan 5, 2024 08:52:51   #
Urnst wrote:
what happened to him?


Ken Wheeler is still there.
Go to
Jan 4, 2024 09:48:50   #
Pache wrote:
I have an excellent problem. I purchased a Nikon Z5, and then upgraded to a Z8. Wonderfully, my wife started wanting to go out on shoots with me. Now, the challenge is having enough lenses for both of us.

We shoot outdoors, primarily landscapes, birds, and flowers. We have the wide-angle side covered. I have given her my Nikon 24-200 4-6.3. I have been using the Nikon Z 100-400 f.5-5.6 VR S. The 100-400 is a little long. I am considering the Nikon 70-200 2.8 S. The reviews are great, but the lens is expensive and big.
I can afford the lens, but don't know want to be wasteful. Any suggestions?
I have an excellent problem. I purchased a Niko... (show quote)


If it puta you where you want to be (enjoying photography with your wife) and you can afford it, how can it be wasteful?
Go to
Dec 31, 2023 20:02:01   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Having both an OM-1 and Z9, they’re both great and flexible cameras, but the OM-1 does have a big edge in shooting features.


Name them.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 381 next>>
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.