Hmm I'm 79 and have a cell phone and no land line. I keep my phone all the time and would not be without it. As far as I am concerned the cell phone is one of the most important inventions ever. It is basically a mini computer capable of doing many functions including taking decent photos. For people that disdain cell phones i guess to each his own.
Nikon 70-200 f/4, Sigma 17-50. Thanks for the sugestion. I will check them out.I picked up 2 like new lenses really cheap to sell so the investment is nil. I plan to use the macro for flowers, plants, dog and people portraits.I am have been doing research on the Nikon 105 vr and Tamron 90 vc. So at this point it is probably one or the other.
Bohoca what do you mainly shoot with the 105?
Thanks for the rep;y Don. What do you mainly shoot with the 105?
Hey Hoggers i'm looking for advice on a macro for mainly flowers and dog portraits. After lots of research I have pretty much narrowed it down to the Nikon 105mm vr and Tamron 90mm vc. My body is a Nikon D7200. Any one have experience on both or one or the other? My gut says the Nikon but I keep reading about how good the Tamron is. I did find a "like new " Tamron for about the same price as an "excellent" Nikon at MPB.Thanks for any input.
If i do answer these scammers I tell them they have reached the Irvine Police Department. They hang up real quick
Yes it was great news. I went thru the same agony with Prostrate cancer, 13 years ago.
Hi A10. I got a "like new" 70-200 f/4 from MPB for $560. I cannot tell it from new and am very happy with it
Hey Hoggers i am pretty much a casual shooter doing dog and people portraits along with anything I find interesting. I currently have a Nikon D7200 with Nikon 70-200 f/4 and a Sigma 17-50.I was looking for a ultra wide for landscapes. After reseaching all the ultra wides I found a Tokina 11-16 f2.8 AT-X Pro DX at MPB in "like new" condition for $119. I was pretty apprehensive about the low $119 price but went ahead and ordered it.The lens should be here in a couple days so I will see if it is any good. I can always send it back if I don't like it. I have used MPB a few times and was never disapointed. What do you guys think? Thanks for any comments.
Hey Golf I was looking for a 70-200 to use primarly out doors in good light. After extensive research I settled on the Nikon 70-200f/4. I got a "like new" from MPB for $560. I can't tell it from new and I am very happy with it
I agree with you Stroday. I upgraded from a 3200 to the 7200 a year after they came on the market. Since then I have tested the 750,850 and 500. I'll just stick with the 7200 to go with my Nikon 70-20o and Sigma 17-50.
That is great news!! I am so glad for you. 12 yeaars ago I was diagnosed with Prostrate Cancer. After robotic surgery and radiation I too am cancer free. Cancer came we fought we won.
Strodav I agree with you. A few years ago I upgraded from the 3200 to the 7200. I have a 70-200 f4 and
Sigma 17-50 to go with it. I will probably pick up an ultra wide for some landcapes. Even with so much buzz about
mirrorlless and full frame I am very happy with my set up.
Hi Bob. I have the 7200 and 70-200f/4 too and a vintage 75-300 for when I have some space and don't need to go wide. For landscapes and wide angle a Nikon 10-20 and for tighter spaces and group shots a Sigma 17-50. I have read that the 18-200 and 24-120 are excellent lenses. I use MPB for
used lenses