Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dan De Lion
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 42 next>>
Aug 5, 2018 12:52:25   #
This is what happens if you buy a 24 -> 3000 zoom.

https://youtu.be/34EpY9LgOiY
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 21:51:52   #
BebuLamar wrote:
It's you that buy 2 D850s but you're not one that would consider the Fuji regardless whether Nikon makes a D850 or not. For the same token whoever want the DFX don't care what Nikon make.


-----

Another denier, you guys ought to form a club.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 21:38:11   #
BebuLamar wrote:
You're so naive! People who buy the Fuji won't buy the D850.


-----

No they'll buy two D850s for the same price and get superior IQ.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 21:28:32   #
-----

Theorie Apophasis review of the D850 is in. To quote him: "The D850 is an epic winner" over the medium format Fuji. The review may be seen on You Tube.

Just another nail in the D850 Denier's coffin.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 20:40:11   #
unintentional double post
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 20:40:04   #
-----

I'll keep all you delusional deniers up to date as returns on the 850 continue to come in. Rockwell said its purchase is a no brainer but, that doesn't count for much. Of course, Tony Northrup said essentially the same thing, but who the hell is he! So let's keep track of all LKP deniers so that we can ID those that are seriously dumb. Let the experts speak, but don't forget you heard it from me first. I'll not let you deniers forget it!

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 19:11:49   #
selmslie wrote:
1) You did. See http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-31174-17.html#3217914 The camera model is identified in the EXIF information.
2) There is the Pentax 645Z 51.4 MP at $7000
3) I have 2 Hasselblads and a Rolleiflex. I used a Mamiya RB67 before I got the Hasselblads and the 4x5 view camera..
4) You have no idea what you are talking about.

I guess that makes you dumber than me.

I don't care what some reviewer I have never heard of says about a camera and I certainly don't trust your hearsay "evidence".

I don't have anything to disprove. You still need to prove that you are not a liar and a fraud.
1) You did. See http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-311... (show quote)


-----

Well, well. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. I posted that pic 3 years ago as an example of the RX10 output. And it is a really good example of a 1 inch sensor's output. My wife still uses that $1300 camera.-- You've got the quote, go prove it wrong. As for your cameras, what a buntch of old junk. No wonder you're in denial about the 850. Sometime think about the know-nothing clowns that buttress your uninformed opinions.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 18:06:37   #
selmslie wrote:
We have seen no evidence that he has ever told the truth about his own images. Until he demonstrates otherwise, he is a fraud. For all we know he has been lying throughout all of his posts.

He has posted only a single image with intact EXIF information that indicates it was taken with a Sony DSC-RX10, 20 MP. The only other image seems to have been cropped to 25 MP from a larger sensor but there is no evidence that it is his own image.


-----

Selmslie - You're getting dumber and dumber as this post goes on. 1) I never posted any pic taken with an RX10. 2) There is no MF camera in the price range of $7000 that comes even remotely close to the 850. 3) You don't know anything about MF (I use Hassy's.) 4) You're ignorant amateur who knows practically nothing about photography and yet you expect me to take the time to prove to you someone else's quote. Go out and do your own research, I'm not your Pa (thank the Gods), and I don't feel required to guide some dummy through life.

Here's the original quote: "Offering a compelling balance of size and speed, the Nikon D850 is the best all-round DSLR camera that we've ever had the pleasure of reviewing. This is really the one camera that can do it all, from landscapes to action, reportage to weddings, the D850 handles it all with aplomb" (Photographyblog.com). --- Read the quote a couple of times, then go out and disprove it. Perhaps with one of your film cameras.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 16:14:33   #
selmslie wrote:
A fool and his money are soon parted. For that kind of money you could have moved up to medium format digital with over 50 MP in a 33x44 mm sensor.

Come back when you can show us a demonstration of the improvement with the D850 over the D810 - when you are ready to put up or shut up.

Until then you have no credibility - LKP.


-----

selmslie - You're rather thick. What MF does 9 FPS? What MF has high ISO? What MF has a dozen or so other features that come with the 850. I suggest you read the reviews and the spec's. Then you'll see what a dumb suggestion you made. Apparently you know little about photography, but you seemed determined to prove it over and over. Go back to your P&S, you're not competent to run with the big dogs.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 15:30:50   #
selmslie wrote:
Actually, you have been as insulting as anyone else.

Here's a challenge for you. Put your money where your mouth is. Buy one and then demonstrate to us how much better the images are from your new D850 than from your current camera.

If you can show us a difference then maybe it matters. If you can't then maybe you don't know what you are talking about - you would be the LKP!


-----

Go back to pg. 7 and see who started it (hint: Gene51.) Actually I've already ordered 2 from B&H plus a grip. I already have the batteries and charger. Unfortunately B&H couldn't deliver them till after I leave the country for 10 weeks. Have no fear, I'll be back by the middle of Jan., 2018. If you still have any questions about 850s, I'll be glad to enlighten you at that time. Those two 850s will be replacing my well used 750s and 810.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 13:10:07   #
Gene51 wrote:


Problem is he not aware he's lost the argument.


-----

Gene51 - Have you already forgotten that you were done with this post? Senility is a horrible thing. Just remember, the 850 easily replaces the 750. Once you come to grips with that, you'll understand the consistency of my posts.

Feel free to request info on any other areas of photography that you are confused about.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 12:58:36   #
rehess wrote:
Insulting others is normally the course one takes when one is losing a discussion.


-----

Don't be too hard on the LKPs. If you read the above posts you'll see who changed this thread from technical to insults.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 12:48:05   #
Gene51 wrote:
I can't be bothered wasting anymore time on this thread - shooting a 45mp camera at 25 mp is NOT downsampling.


-----

Now that poor Gene51 has been shown to be totally wrong, he can't be bothered wasting anymore time. Gene51, I know you are a little calcified between your ears, but surely you now know why the 850 is a good replacement for the 750?

As always, Gene51, I'm happy to clarify all the technical issues that befuddle you.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 12:36:29   #
chaman wrote:
Is your body of work available somewhere? Since all here a LKP like you say I would love to see your work.


-----

Hell, if the LKP hat fits, wear it. I didn't say everyone is a LKP, but people like Gene, Hayden, Steve... certainly fit the bill. You'll find a couple of my pics on UHH.

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 12:27:58   #
karno wrote:
Please explain yourself, I am not very good at tests.
25mp? Are you saying that because of deffracrion ?


-----

The 850 has a FF setting that allows you to select 11, 25, or 46mp. Bear in mind that's FF not cropped. I expect the 11 and 25 settings will further improve the 850's excellent DR.

LKPs, like Gene51, haven't wrapped their minds around that yet, and in Gene51's case, probably never will.

-----
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 42 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.