Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bobspez
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 333 next>>
May 23, 2022 15:35:29   #
Depends on what you will shoot. If you shoot wildlife and birds I would pick the smaller sensor GF 50 which has the longer focal length (600mm vs 382mm). But if that's not a consideration I'd pick the GF 60 for the larger sensor and better quality image.
Go to
May 22, 2022 16:24:30   #
farwest wrote:
My friends son has been saving his money and has 500.00 saved to buy a camera. He is into aviation and wants to take pictures of the moon. Looking for recommendations to get the teenager started.
He can get a used Nikon Coolpix B700 on ebay in good condition from top rated sellers for between $300-$400. This pic of the moon was taken with it, cropped and tweaked in Photoshop. This is the best pic you can get of the moon in that price range. The camera can also be used in manual mode letting the user select the ISO, shutter speed and aperture. This was shot at full optical zoom (equivalent focal length 1400mm), f5.6, 1/500 sec., iso100. And this camera shoots 4K video as well. Click on download and the + to see fine details.


(Download)
Go to
Apr 28, 2022 22:00:08   #
Have you tried enhancing the camera audio with audio editing (volume, EQ, echo, etc.)? When I edit my videos I also spend some time with the audio. The problem with a camera mic or even a separate recorder like the zoom is you have to watch for extraneous noises (autofocus hunting, auto aperture changes, brushing with your sleeve, etc.). I find the zoom has good audio quality and I sync it with the camera audio in the video editor.
Go to
Apr 23, 2022 13:09:05   #
Spray and pray has worked for me with small birds. Sometimes I can get a decent shot out of a dozen or so. The bird may only be photogenic for a second or so. I don't have the reflexes to capture just that second. If spray and pray is available, why not use it?
Here's an example of spray and pray. This cardinal landed and stayed there for about 4 or 5 seconds before flying off. By the time I zoomed in on the lens and autofocused I had a couple of seconds at most. On the first pic the bird was partially obscured by a shadows. On the second it wasn't.
I've taken many pics of small birds. When the bird turns just so and I can get an interesting shot, I consider that a lucky shot.

Below another example of spray and pray and a lucky shot. Hand held tracking the gulls. I didn't even see the food in the white gulls mouth that the dark gull is looking at.


(Download)


(Download)


Go to
Apr 21, 2022 11:55:37   #
anotherview wrote:
Not so: "A nine minute video of George Floyd's murder has forever rewritten the ethical landscape of the United States."

Facts go with the video to round out the view of this matter. The rap sheet of Mr. Floyd tells us of another side of him, as a criminal. In fact, the cops arrested him for shoplifting.

His autopsy detected illicit drugs in his system.

Unfortunately, his arrest involved police misconduct bringing his untimely death.

The leftist movement to demonize the police using the death of Mr. Floyd evoked some public support and political activity.

In all of this conversation, an onlooker may arrive at a fair depiction of the incident and its aftermath minus any ethical perspective. An evaluation of available facts and information along with applied reason suffice to produce a useful comprehension.

An onlooker may draw a lesson or two from this incident. Cooperate with the police. Do not struggle with the police. Do not steal. Do not do drugs.
Not so: "A nine minute video of George Floyd... (show quote)
... or the police may murder you. I think we already knew that.
Go to
Apr 19, 2022 16:56:04   #
rmalarz wrote:
Thomas, I've been dabbling with video for some time. My dad was an assistant director, at one stage of his career. So, I've been exposed to moving making some time ago. I've even written outlines for a couple of movies, as personal projects. However, my first love, in the visual arts field, is photography.

Video may have an interest in today's environment but a still photograph is still captivating and, probably, has more punch than a video. Eddie Adams' photograph had far more impact than the film shot of the execution. I haven't done any research on which has more impact, a single photograph or a video. It would seem the photograph would be remembered more than a video. Perhaps it's the transient nature of the sequential images of the video that leaves less of a lasting detailed impression.
--Bob
Thomas, I've been dabbling with video for some tim... (show quote)


With so many images I wonder if anything makes an impact any more. A one hour TV show on a non-premium non-commercial free channel has about 50 commercials in a one hour program. There is about 20 minutes of commercials per 40 minutes of program. Movies and videos are now made with fast cuts so that the scene changes every couple of seconds. We are bombarded with hundreds of thousands of images every year or two. There's just not enough room in our brains to retain it. I can easily remember a half dozen of my favorite movies. I can't remember any that have come out in the last 10 years, even though I am sure I enjoyed some of them. Oops, maybe it's me.
Go to
Apr 15, 2022 21:28:44   #
Tried a bit of creative editing on this one. Hope you like it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fvNmTIT7UY
Go to
Apr 15, 2022 21:18:47   #
Very nicely done, Bill.
Go to
Apr 9, 2022 13:14:30   #
Bill_de wrote:
Then 2+2 must = 9


---
2+2=4. I have tested it out to my satisfaction. Have you tested it, or are you just repeating the most popular theories? I guess you would have believed the earth was flat six centuries ago because everyone else did.
Go to
Apr 9, 2022 12:54:51   #
My experience is the opposite. A smaller sensor increases the area of the object in the frame and therefore the focusing is better. I have tested the theory by photographing the same object with the same lens at the same distance on three different size sensors, FX, DX and CX (1" sensor). The smaller the sensor, the sharper the image when all three images are cropped to the same size. That's my experience. To quote Einstein, "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they are not."
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 17:18:05   #
It's been many years but the view of waves hitting the rocks in Monterey, seen from the coast highway, was pretty spectacular.
Go to
Mar 29, 2022 21:08:10   #
latebloomer wrote:
What is recommend for a monitor?


I have a 10 year old 20 inch led backlit lcd Viewsonic VA2012wb monitor. It works fine for me. I'm on my third desktop with it. For me the 20 inch diagonal screen is just the right size. I'm sitting with my eyes about 2 ft. from the screen.
Go to
Mar 29, 2022 18:49:50   #
latebloomer wrote:
To do this with ease, Does the following Dell get me started? Is it possible I might not nead to make masker upgrades?
https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/desktop-computers/xps-desktop/spd/xps-8950-desktop/xd8950adl20h


https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/desktop-computers/sr/desktops/xps-desktops


View Delivery Dates for 95101
12ᵗʰ Gen Intel® Core™ i5-12400
Windows 11 Home
NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1650 SUPER™
16 GB Memory
256 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD


Do you have other suggestions?
This Dell will not arrive for a month. I wish I had the Dell a few weeks ago.

Thanks for all you are doing to help me. I appreciate your time.

Terry Sandlin
To do this with ease, Does the following Dell get ... (show quote)


Yes that will work and is a better choice than the previous ones. But what about a monitor mouse and keyboard?
Can you use your existing ones? If so you are all set.
Go to
Mar 24, 2022 17:35:51   #
piano44 wrote:
What about a projector with a 5-bladed shutter? As I understand, most movie projectors have a rotating shutter with 3 blades, to add more "flickers" to the projected image. If you only had 16 flickers per second, your eye would notice it. But 16 x 3 = 48 flickers, and the persistence of your eye smooths this out. So 18 fps gives you 54 flickers per second, and 24 fps gives you 72. But a video camera shoots 30 frames per second, so none of these match up. But with a 5-bladed shutter, you get 18 x 5 = 90, or 24 x 5 = 120. These both divide evenly by 30, a better match. However, 16 x 5 = 80, which still does not divide evenly by 30. I have bought a 5-bladed projector on eBay, but haven't tried this out yet.
What about a projector with a 5-bladed shutter? A... (show quote)
From further research it seems like the flicker may be a moving bar across the image like we used to see on old tube TV's when the vertical hold needed to be adjusted. If that is the case then a variable speed 8mm/super 8mm projector might be the only answer. Here's one on youtube that advertised flicker free film transfers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjSo892DKms
Maybe someone who has videoed projected 8mm and super 8mm might chime in here.
Go to
Mar 24, 2022 13:09:47   #
drmike99 wrote:
#1 I am retired. Time is my cheapest commodity.
#2. I have a lot of film to scan. It would be prohibitive to scan commercially especially in view of #3 —
#3. I have a lot of my dad’s 16 mm movies. There are NO home scanners for those so I need to have money available to commercially scan those.

I have not scanned my large 8mm reel containing all my spliced reels because it and my projector were stolen years ago from the back seat of my car. However, if I were to do it I would set up a flat white piece of poster board on the wall, darken the room by covering the windows, and run the film on a projector and video it with a 4K camera on a tripod. This would allow you to scan in real time, rather than frame by frame. And you could easily improve the image and the speed in a video editor like Premiere Pro. And if there is a sound track you could tweak that as well with an audio editor like Adobe Audition which works together with Adobe Premiere Pro within the Premiere Pro timeline.

Everything I have read on film scanners has a lot of negatives, very long time to digitize a frame at a time, damaging the film, frequent stalls and need to watch the scanner during the entire process, unsatisfactory results.

I believe 16mm film runs at 24fps so there should be no frame rate mismatch there if you set the camera video to 24 fps. So I would start with the 16mm film. I would adjust the size of the projected image to get the clearest and best image with the naked eye.

This is just a guess but if you experiment with different shutter speeds and fps videoing the 8mm film you may be able to improve flicker due to mismatched frame rates. There are also youtube videos on techniques to remove light flicker in Premiere Pro that may work on frame rate mismatch flicker. But when you get the best techniques figured out, it should work for the rest of your project.

I wish I still had my 8mm reel to give this a try. Good luck.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 333 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.