Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DMF
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
Dec 9, 2020 15:20:40   #
Thanks, this is the information I am looking for.
Go to
Dec 9, 2020 15:05:22   #
Appear to be very popular. Any experience going to larger prints of that size?
Go to
Dec 9, 2020 14:55:09   #
Looking for a commercial photographic printing service for larger prints, e.g., 15 X 30. Suggestions?
Doug
Go to
Nov 25, 2020 20:14:04   #
After much research I have reached the same conclusion. Pleased to have someone who is thinking the same way, gives me a little confidence in my logic. :-)
Received a large number of responses, thanks Doug
Go to
Nov 25, 2020 16:32:44   #
This really helped. Supports where we are headed. Keeping the larger format and buying the smaller format for “walking around”. Thanks.
Go to
Nov 24, 2020 13:28:32   #
Your suggesting 4/3 will eventually not be a significant step beyond cellphones. Indeed, at the rate the cell phone is moving staying with the full frame makes sense.
Go to
Nov 24, 2020 11:41:57   #
Not me!!!
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 23:40:09   #
burkphoto wrote:
SYSTEM weight (defined as the weight of the camera bag you carry around) will not change significantly if you keep using full frame lenses. For most of us, lenses are where the weight is. Oh, you can settle for smaller maximum apertures and save a bit of weight, but if you like to work in low light, that's annoying.

I have used many cameras, both personally and professionally. Today's cameras are incredible — period. I would rent to try before you buy. Basically, menus, ergonomics, weight, and feature sets matter a hell of a lot more than brand. All of the majors are making great bodies and lenses now. And since most of the mirrorless lens designs are less than ten years old, they benefit from the current state of the art.

That said, life is full of little trade-offs. EVERY camera is some sort of compromise. You give up some attributes to get those which are mutually exclusive. We can't buck the laws of physics.

My personal system is Micro 4/3. I use a Lumix GH4 for both video and stills. I have three pro-grade stabilized lenses — 12-35mm f/2.8, 30mm f/2.8 Macro, and 35-100mm f/2.8 (equivalent to full frame 24-70, 60, and 70-200 mm range), plus a couple of f/1.7 primes (15mm and 42.5mm). My entire system will fit under an airline seat. My bag is half the weight of what it was in my APS-C dSLR days, and 1/3 the weight of my kit in the film days of my youth.

I can, and have, written 7-page explanations of why I use what I use. It DOES NOT work for everyone, but it is exactly what I need. The best advice I can give you is go to http://www.dpreview.com and read reviews of the latest gear in your budget range. Then rent, and give the rental gear a good workout.

I would carefully define what it is you want to photograph. Define a kit weight you can tolerate. Define what is most important to you about a system. Define a budget. Then look for gear that meets your needs as best as you can find. Every body and lens has its niche application.

If it's Micro 4/3 you want, the Lumix G9 and GH5 are top-tier machines. Both are particularly good at BOTH stills and video. The G9 is the better stills camera, and the GH5 is the better video camera.

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the OM-D E-M1X are also top-tier. Others here have sung their praises.

If you like APS-C, the Fujifilm XT-4 is my target pick because their lenses are specifically designed for THAT FORMAT. Its film simulations in JPEG mode are great.

I'm not going to get into Sony, Canon, and Nikon offerings. Others will tell you their stories. Suffice it to say their mirrorless offerings were not there when I was in need of a new system. If a full frame mirrorless system were available in 2014, I would have bought it, so long as the audio features of the video section had pro features.
SYSTEM weight (defined as the weight of the camera... (show quote)


Lot of info to digest coming in, may need to run and hide. Sincerely appreciate everyone taking the time to help. Thanks again. Doug
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 23:32:33   #
TriX wrote:
Because the first 4, which comprise almost 90 percent of the entire camera market, do not offer 4/3, and overall, the camera market is shrinking as people more and more use cellphones. Olympus, which (rightly) has a loyal following, has just sold off their camera division to a holding company, and its future is uncertain - possibly a portent of things to come, and at least something to consider when investing in a new system.


Appears waiting would be best. Thanks for taking the time to help me understand. Doug
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 20:45:38   #
TriX wrote:
Doug, If you use the “quote reply” button under the post you’re replying to, it will help us understand who your response is directed to.

Cheers,
Chris


Thanks, had not noticed this. Certainly will help. Doug
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 20:14:18   #
The table appears to list manufacturers not models. Not sure how you interpret that 4/3 is barely holding on? Perhaps because neither Cannon or Nikon offer 4/3. Need help?
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 20:05:06   #
I will remember that!!! 👍Doug
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 19:49:17   #
Certainly does. If the quality works for large prints, 4/3 seems to be the way the technology is moving. Doug
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 00:19:43   #
When reading about the 4/3 the "square" image is used. Are guidelines for the other formats available in the view finder? I always fill the frame.
Go to
Nov 22, 2020 00:03:50   #
Is the lens weight significantly different for mirrorless cameras?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.