Posts for: elandel
Apr 21, 2018 11:52:28 #
BebuLamar wrote:
What did the doctor say about your GAS? There is no sense to talk gear if you still have the slightest trace of it.
He said I must talk and Buy a Sony A7r2, which I di.
Bit A7r3 is better, which I Will.
Apr 17, 2018 07:42:22 #
I think I'll get the 18-105 with a very cheap a6000 and use it as a second body. I read the 18-105 can be used on a7r2 as video lens eith vety good results.
Apr 16, 2018 19:21:08 #
Thanks for your testing. As someone said "decent glass will give better results on a better sensor" given excellent glass will give excellent results on excellent sensor.
So I think you are right that 18-105 will give slightly better results on the a7r2's sensor which is better than the one on a6000. Thanks for confirming.
So I think you are right that 18-105 will give slightly better results on the a7r2's sensor which is better than the one on a6000. Thanks for confirming.
Apr 16, 2018 17:10:51 #
repleo wrote:
Yes they will work perfectly. Just make sure the camera is on crop mode. If it is on auto it will detect Sony crop lenses, but you may have to change it manually for non-Sony lenses. Even allowing for the drop to 16 -18 mpix don't expect aps-c lenses to compare with GM lenses.
Thanks. I'm aware of that but will iq be better, same or worse as if the same lens is mounted on a native crop camera?
Apr 16, 2018 12:56:39 #
Hi all,
It's a while I don't post but for personal reasons I did not shoot much...but changed many cameras (severe GAS attack).
Now I'm settled down and satisfied with a Sony A7RII.
Problem is lens. I use Canon adapted lenses with Sigma MC-11 mainly because the FE GM lenses cost a kidney and a liver. Now I'm curious how Sony apsc lenses perform on my R2. I now that they crop and many do not recommend etc etc, but I can get a couple of E lens very cheap. I'm speaking of the 10-18 and 18-105 G.
Does anyone use them on the A7r2? How does the 18mpx image compare? I mean is it usable for non professional needs?
Anyone has tried other combinations and can give advise?
Thanks.
It's a while I don't post but for personal reasons I did not shoot much...but changed many cameras (severe GAS attack).
Now I'm settled down and satisfied with a Sony A7RII.
Problem is lens. I use Canon adapted lenses with Sigma MC-11 mainly because the FE GM lenses cost a kidney and a liver. Now I'm curious how Sony apsc lenses perform on my R2. I now that they crop and many do not recommend etc etc, but I can get a couple of E lens very cheap. I'm speaking of the 10-18 and 18-105 G.
Does anyone use them on the A7r2? How does the 18mpx image compare? I mean is it usable for non professional needs?
Anyone has tried other combinations and can give advise?
Thanks.
Mar 9, 2015 04:44:07 #
If I could afford it I would buy the 750. Just for the lust.
Mar 3, 2015 13:18:06 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Don't live a life of regrets and compromises.
Yes. Get the D750.
Mar 1, 2015 14:37:11 #
Feb 19, 2015 01:09:01 #
tdekany wrote:
I believe I know you from M4/3.com
The 610 is heavy compared to the 7. LENSES: Pretty sure that most of them you will never consider, let alone buy. So if the focal lengths that you use is available in the Sony, go for he A7II - don't you want 5 axis IS?
The 610 is heavy compared to the 7. LENSES: Pretty sure that most of them you will never consider, let alone buy. So if the focal lengths that you use is available in the Sony, go for he A7II - don't you want 5 axis IS?
Yes I am on m4/3. Un' a jpeg and zoom boy so tuo se are importanti to me.
Feb 18, 2015 15:26:25 #
Feb 18, 2015 14:29:21 #
MtnMan wrote:
So get a Nikon D5300. My refurb one arrived yester... (show quote)
Good idea. But have to think more about it.
Feb 18, 2015 13:03:16 #
a2000c wrote:
Both. Sony a6000 and the d610. I did. They both have their place. I like having the choice between crop sensor and FF.
Me too...too many times:mrgreen:
Feb 18, 2015 13:01:51 #
stan0301 wrote:
One thing you may or may not have thought of is "you buy a camera, and then you start to accumulate lenses"--which pretty much means that that is your camera brand for life--Nikon has never changed its lens mount--the very first lens I ever owned will still fit on my newest Nikon--whether Sony will even be making cameras ten years from now is an unanswered question--I would stick to Nikon or Canon--but Canon has in the past changed its mount--which makes me glad I chose Nikon.
Stan
Stan
Yes I know. I had a D7100 and it was an awesome camera then stupidly sold it because of weight but at the end of the day I don't lug cameras around all day if not in very particular situations like holidays and even then I have a lighter setup that is my Oly gear.
Yhe more I look at it the more I'm getting aware that it is really a very severe attack of GAS and so I must feed it otherwise it will grow more and until I go after something like D750 or A7MKII. :shock: :mrgreen:
Feb 18, 2015 12:26:05 #
jackpi wrote:
I concur. The Sony A6000 is a fantastic camera.
I know its a fantastic camera but I'm bit by the FF fewer.
Feb 18, 2015 12:13:47 #
shutterbob wrote:
I'm a Nikon guy so of coarse I'm going to recommend Nikon. But a big reason I am a Nikon guy is because of the glass. They have a huge number of lenses available that are top quality. If you are moving up to full frame, then the slight weight savings of the Sony shouldn't matter much anyway. I have never regretted having Nikons.
Can you please quantify 'slight' weight savings?