Bob, which back did you end up getting? I've considered one for my 500c, but it's hard for me to justify the expense of newer ones because it's just for fun. The older options are more affordable, but seem to be rather clunky to use and may not offer benefits over new FX sensors. I've only gotten as far as an F-to-V mount adapter to use the Zeiss glass on my Nikons. Curious as to that part of your experience.

I don't mean to hijack you post, but if you decide you are interested in the Nikon 12-24 f/4, the one I listed for sale here a couple of months ago is still available. I just haven't put it on eBay yet. Very nice lens for a very fair price.

Hi everyone,
One last mention of my lenses for sale here. I go on vacation next week, and then I'll put them on eBay when I return. If you have any interest, let me know.
Thanks again,
Dave

Hi Hoggers,
I don't post much here, but I'm still a daily reader. I have a closet full of gear that I'm trying to get under control. Both of these lenses are in excellent, near-new condition. I'm listing them here first, then they go to ebay. Prices include shipping and fees, PayPal preferred.

First, the Nikon 12-24 f/4 G IF-ED AF. This is a DX (crop) lens, but will cover FF at the longer end (~18-24mm). I don't have a DX camera anymore, and I have a full frame wide angle. It's not a focal range I tended to use, so it's had a very easy life. The glass is perfect, the body is, too, as far as I can see. The picture shows what looks like minor roughness where the lens cap fits, but in person, I can't really see it. Any white specs in the photos are external dust, not blemishes. Also included, but not in the photo, is the soft case. I can't guarantee it's "the" case that came with the lens, but it is a genuine Nikon case from my lens drawer.
Price is a firm $325 including shipping to CONUS.

Next is my Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 VC USD. I bought this about three years ago, then with a sudden GAS attack (initiated by a trip-of-a-lifetime to the Galapagos), I immediately purchased a Nikon 70-200mm lens. Since then, I've been using the Nikon exclusively. The Tamron is still perfectly good, and has maybe 50 clicks on it.
Price is a firm $225 including shipping to CONUS.

Again, I'm not a prolific poster, but buy with confidence. I don't exaggerate the condition of the items, and I have perfect feedback on ebay dating back to 2000. PM me for my user name if you want to check. Feel free to contact me with questions. Thanks for looking,
Dave

(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

I absolutely agree with this - be cautious about using cheap/fake glasses. I happen to have a microspectrophotometer (MSP) in my lab here, so I can examine the light spectrum passing through different materials. A few years ago on vacation I bought a cheap pair of "genuine" Ray Ban glasses (I knew they were fake but I was having fun with the street vendor). I later tested them in the lab - turns out they let more UV light in than visible light. Dangerous!

PS Haven't posted here in ages, still check in pretty often. Hi everyone.

We were there in June, no one even glanced at my camera gear. I was carrying two bodies, one with a big Nikkor 70-200, a shoulder bag with extra lenses without any issues. Take what you want and enjoy yourself. No need to worry about restrictions, I don't think they exist.

The upcoming Sigma f/2 is a 24-35mm, not 24-70mm.

http://nikonrumors.com/2015/07/16/the-sigma-24-35mm-f2-dg-hsm-art-lens-will-cost-999-in-the-us.aspx/

No, it's not an interstate. I17 goes from Phoenix to Flagstaff, but not through Sedona. You're talking about Rt 89A, a two-lane which goes from Sedona, up through Oak Creek Canyon past Slide Rock, and continues to Flagstaff.
Incidentally, the West Fork of Oak Creek is along this route, and well worth the stop and short hike. It was mentioned before, but kind of buried in 1000 other things to see.

No, it's not the new 16-80 f/2.8-4.0. If so, I'd be asking $1000 :wink:

It's still a currently recommended DX lens by Thom Hogan. (Sorry, don't have the link handy.)

Hi everyone,
As a fallout of having severe GAS, I no longer need most of my Nikon DX equipment. Therefore, my latest sale item is an excellent condition Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX ED VR lens. I found it to be very sharp - up there with the best- with a great zoom range for general use. I used it sometimes, I switched lenses often. Looking through my Lightroom catalog, I'd be surprised if it has more than 500 shots taken with it (I still have the old film mentality engrained in me, so I don't shoot thousands of pics).

I'm asking $350, including shipping to the CONUS. Paypal only, and I'll cover any fees. After a few days, I'll put it up on eBay. Thanks for looking, and feel free to ask any questions.

-Dave

(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

--SOLD--
I have a genuine Nikon brand battery grip for the D7000 in excellent condition. I'm selling off some of my DX gear since I've bought a D610. The grip is gently used, with very little signs of use/wear. Comes with box and manual. I'll leave this ad up for a few days, then the grip goes on eBay.

$85 includes shipping to the Lower 48 states and PayPal fees. Paypal only, for a secure and easy transaction.

Feel free to ask any questions.
Thanks,
Dave

OK, deal. I'll have to dig through the archives and see if I can find some practice shots with the Zeiss/NEX combo. The NEX has similar resolution to the D7000, 16mp APS-C. I have a D7000, too, along with a D610 for comparing results.

I have adapters for Hasselblad V and Exakta mount to my NEX camera. The big Zeiss V mount lenses are almost comical on the tiny NEX camera, but it's fun to play with. I've avoided the adapters for to Nikon DSLR, mainly because I didn't want a cheap glass element getting in the way. I hadn't realized that the V to F adapter listed here is glass-free. I might just have to order one myself.

Don't take my comment as criticism, that lighting is almost impossible to deal with as a grab shot. No need to do lots in post unless you were shooting for a publication and your editor demanded it. I do really like the scene and atmosphere. The terrain looks like a ton of fun. Very different than my home turf- really rocky here. When it's this hot here I just do short rides or occasionally drive north to the mountains. Most of my biking shots are on film, harder to share. I just don't take my camera with me that much on my solo rides. Keep 'em coming!
Dave

Very cool! The fog does look blown out on my tablet, though. As a cycling junkie I'm really jealous of the ride. It's 108 ° here today, definitely saps the motivation.