Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: hj
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 184 next>>
Apr 11, 2024 07:19:33   #
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
That last one especially!


Almost missed it. I thought "how dumb"...... then I re-read at a faster pace.
Go to
Apr 9, 2024 07:15:45   #
You have got to be kidding! This is humor? Seriously people?
Go to
Mar 20, 2024 13:23:07   #
campyboy1 wrote:
You know what I hate is when it seems like there is more commercials than there is of one-hour T.V. show.


It does seem like they are increasing the number of commercial minutes per hour. There needs to be a law or FTC rule.
Go to
Mar 19, 2024 12:42:21   #
Some of the ads mentioned, I've never seen including Lume. I hate "My Pillow" and "Balance of Nature" and the cleaningone on Saturday mornings where she says "I have a bottle in every room". Don't know the name so just goes to show repetition does not work and least for me.
Go to
Mar 17, 2024 18:50:16   #
Ava'sPapa wrote:
I offered these lenses for sale earlier in the week. I've had two esteemed UHH members ask me why so expensive? As I stated in the ad these are all like new. The Canon RF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM, for example cost me $2976, new from B&H. In "like new" (as is mine) condition, from MPB, this lens is selling for $2399. MPB offered me $1700. So, I figured a fair price would be $1950... and that's still $700 cheaper than MPB for the same lens and condition. And I'm paying for the postage and insurance. How low should I go?
If you're interested check these prices against MPB. You can find all of these cheaper on ebay, but are they all this nice? Do they have the original packaging? Clean glass? Lens covers? No scratches or marks of any kind?
I offered these lenses for sale earlier in the wee... (show quote)


Well, I guess I'm splitting hairs but if MPB is selling a like new for $2399 and you want $1950, that's a difference of only $499, not the $700 you mention. Your price still sounds like a good deal though for someone willing to buy a "like new" lens.
Go to
Mar 13, 2024 21:00:42   #
Deleted my comment I just saw Keywest305 said the same thing.
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 15:17:39   #
therwol wrote:
JPEG SOOC. No manipulation. Just showing that the lens is sharp.


Guessed that might be the case. I shoot a Canon G9X Mark II and love it.
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 15:16:37   #
Haydon wrote:
Any reconsideration by chance?


Tempted, but I need to keep. It is just too good a camera and so easy to carry in any pocket. Can't believe how much used ones are going for now. Thanks for your interest though.
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 13:43:30   #
therwol wrote:
Since everyone else is posting pictures, here's one I've posted before taken with my Canon G7 II.


Nice but could be a little bighter.
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 17:09:39   #
jrcarpe wrote:
I used a Canon G11 for a few years until a thief took it from my truck. Did not replace it yet as I don't like cameras without a view finder. Canon G 11 & 12 were great cameras.


I have the G15 and love, love, love it as well as the Canon G9XII with it's 1" sensor.
Go to
Mar 9, 2024 16:09:24   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I've been shooting my pocket-sized Canon Powershot G9Xii more than any other of my film & digital cameras. At 20MP capturing in RAW, with IBIS, it does a wonderful job, better than my phone. Both Canon and Sony offer these cameras, sized roughly the same as a deck of cards.


Love my Canon G9Xii also. Very compact and has 1" sensor.
Go to
Mar 3, 2024 07:09:12   #
Thanks to everyone who has given information regarding their experiences cutting the cord on cable TV. Special thanks to Linda From Maine who gave me special help through private messages. Looks like ROKU and YOUTUBETV are the winners with most recommendations. Will look more closely at SLING also. Thanks again.
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 11:06:37   #
StanMac may or may not be correct. Not sure where the millions for ads go.... to the program creators or perhaps a portion to the streaming source.
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 10:59:51   #
Apple TVs are not cheap. Look it up on Amazon. Roku and FireSticks are a fraction of the cost.
Go to
Feb 29, 2024 19:28:16   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
A lot of fascinating and extensive, detailed information in this article. Here's a snip:

Roku's no-nonsense menu system places the apps front-and-center and lets you arrange them however you please, just like on your phone. It gets to the apps and shows quickly, without filling the screen with other junk.

Using a Fire TV device means wading through a bunch of TV shows and movies in addition to the apps. That would be fine if they were the TV shows and movies you're in the middle of watching, or might actually want to watch -- something Netflix's menus do well. But more often than not, it is hard to care about the TV shows and movies on Fire TV's screen. They just seem like stuff Amazon or its partners want us to watch.
A lot of fascinating and extensive, detailed infor... (show quote)


VERY GOOD ARTICLE!
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 184 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.