Posts for: cfbudd
Dec 31, 2016 13:08:14 #
choiahn wrote:
I need some help from your experiences. I recently received a new camera from BH Photo. This is my first order from online. Is the Nikon box for new camera with kit lens SEALED or not? Thanks for sharing your experience in afvance.
Nikon boxes are not sealed!
Dec 21, 2016 12:37:13 #
Dec 13, 2016 17:44:51 #
Szalajj wrote:
The Canon shutter counts roll over every time they hit 9,999.
On a camera that old, it is likely that the shutter count has rolled over several times, especially if there is an _ within the image number!
I've only had my Rebel T5 for just under 2 years, and I've rolled the shutter count over at least twice in that time!
On a camera that old, it is likely that the shutter count has rolled over several times, especially if there is an _ within the image number!
I've only had my Rebel T5 for just under 2 years, and I've rolled the shutter count over at least twice in that time!
The shutter count does not roll over! The file number rolls over.
Dec 13, 2016 17:30:46 #
joann richichi wrote:
Hi. I have a Nikon D7200 and several lenses, however my longest reach is a 70-300 mm 4.5 .. I want to get the best reach without spending a ton of money. Any suggestions? Thank you.
Consider the Nikkor 80-400mm D lens. Slower focus than the 300 F4 AFS and Nikon teleconverters don't fit it, but it's less than $700! The 300mm F4 AFS and a 1.4x is a good choice but at over twice the cost.
Nov 17, 2016 22:53:41 #
Dixiegirl wrote:
No, it's definitely a Red-tailed. Coopers and Sharp-shinned hawks have barred tails.
Then this is a Coopers? http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-415011-1.html
Nov 17, 2016 22:22:14 #
Nov 17, 2016 14:29:37 #
UXOEOD wrote:
Red Tail Hawk watching traffic.
I'm no expert, but do you believe it might be a Cooper's Hawk?
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/PHOTO/LARGE/coopers_hawk_1.jpg
Nov 17, 2016 01:10:25 #
tainkc wrote:
Thank God, huh? I think we were all getting pretty sick and tired of all of those stupid Super Moon shots (including one of mine) that just showed the moon and nothing else. Way too many. Please understand that I am not trying to be mean or insulting. It was just such an overload on this site. I just wish I could have placed mine against a background such as trees, like some were able to do. All I had were roof tops.
The night I was going to make a great shot with a Joshua tree foreground, it was overcast.
Nov 17, 2016 00:40:25 #
Nov 15, 2016 12:15:58 #
NikonJohn wrote:
Nice shot, maybe just a wee bit to much color added. You might try shifting it to a little more red and see what you think. Just an idea, have fun.
This from the guy that posted my moon shot in monochrome. :)
This from the guy that posted my moon shot in monochrome. :)
Thanks. Monochrome is an accurate rendition.
Nov 15, 2016 11:57:04 #
Gene51 wrote:
F4, 1/160, ISO 100 - 600mm F4 on a D800. Your foca... (show quote)
That's a stunning photo!
Nov 15, 2016 11:40:20 #
ssymeono wrote:
Excellent image! but please consider rotating it 90 degrees counter-clockwise.
Interesting. How come?
Nov 14, 2016 22:34:10 #
Nov 14, 2016 21:25:18 #
Nov 14, 2016 11:28:46 #
