DaveD10913 wrote:
I sit here and read these threads and the comments from folks like tschmath who hate people saying to enforce existing gun laws and to offer a suggestion for something different. Ok, but first a question, do you realize that a background check would have done nothing in the case of the Newtown shootings? Adam Lanza did not own the guns he used, he took them after killing his mother. All of the checks in the world would not have helped since his mother protected him and he flew under the radar. BTW, his mother passed all of the Conn. checks that were some of the most restrictive in the country at the time. You want a law that will make a difference? Try a 10 or 15 year mandatory prison sentence for ANYONE convicted of a crime using a gun. No pleas, probation, nothing. Do the crime and you are gone, goodby. Here in Md we now have probably the most restrictive AW ban in the country. Will it help? Probably not, it only further takes away the rights of law abiding citizens. You can't legislate complete safety, there is no stopping the random acts of a madman bent on getting his moment of fame from the media.
I sit here and read these threads and the comments... (
show quote)
One other small thing that CT did was to repeal the death penalty and to release criminals (over 7,000) several years early because the prisons are over crowded and the liberal budget has no room for it. A large number of those released committed more murders and were arrested again just to be released on bail.