Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
rmalarz wrote:
Chris, if they did, it must be private stock and not released to the public.
--Bob
Bob ... I think there was a Scotch labeled - Private Stock ... but, it's release to the Public - proved quite fruitful, from what I gather ...
I guess that includes color negative film, then, too - does it?
I sure wish Ilford would pull their socks up !!!
Maybe, someone should write them and tell them - color won't bite!
Chris T wrote:
Lots of talk, lately, about film coming back ... and so many have also indicated they miss Kodachrome. But, Ektachrome is still around ... so who here still soups it?
hell, yes - as easy as souping black and white negatives. however, one caveat - colour printing at home can be a frustrating exercise. all pros and associates i know send their transparencies out to be printed.
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
wj cody wrote:
hell, yes - as easy as souping black and white negatives. however, one caveat - colour printing at home can be a frustrating exercise. all pros and associates i know send their transparencies out to be printed.
I always printed my transparencies using the Cibachrome process. It takes a little getting used to - since the system is the reverse of printing color negatives ....
But, once you get the hang of it, it goes like clockwork. Of course, it helps to be properly equipped ....
My color prints, WJ - were, in fact, better than the product from a lab up in Hartford ... when I saw and compared my prints with theirs, side-by-side - I was tickled!
All it takes is time, and a little patience ....
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.