A state of ignorance.
Feb 17, 2017 12:22:11 #
Wellhiem wrote:
these are the people that thought you could apply business rules to governing a country...They do in as much as any experiment has to be independently repeatable. If one claims that he got a certain result 3 times in a row, and then no-one else gets the same result, they will look very closely at his data. If they find he's manipulated it in any way, nobody will work with him again, as it'll diminish their credibility.
they want to use economics to explain the scientific method. LOL
Feb 17, 2017 12:25:33 #
BigBear wrote:
The liberals don't have the scruples to question the results as long it gets them where they want to be.
And that's why I'm not responding to you any more on this topic.
Feb 17, 2017 12:49:43 #
Wellhiem wrote:
And that's why I'm not responding to you any more on this topic.
That's a classic liberal response when they are out of ammo.
Feb 17, 2017 13:10:38 #
BigBear wrote:
That's a classic liberal response when they are out of ammo.
This has nothing to do with politics. Why do you assume that because I disagree with yo on one thing, we have to disagree on everything?
That's very unscientific reasoning.
Feb 17, 2017 13:11:48 #
Wellhiem wrote:
everything bad to BB is liberal, his socks start out conservative, by the end of 3 days they are very liberal.This has nothing to do with politics. Why do you assume that because I disagree with yo on one thing, we have to disagree on everything?
That's very unscientific reasoning.
That's very unscientific reasoning.
Feb 17, 2017 13:20:30 #
Wellhiem wrote:
This has nothing to do with politics. Why do you assume that because I disagree with yo on one thing, we have to disagree on everything?
That's very unscientific reasoning.
That's very unscientific reasoning.
I accept that as well as knowing intentionally or unintentionally lines are often blurred.
Feb 17, 2017 13:30:19 #
BigBear wrote:
I accept that as well as knowing intentionally or unintentionally lines are often blurred.
Okay so do you want to draw back to a particular point in the conversation? Or are we done here?
Feb 17, 2017 13:34:18 #
Wellhiem wrote:
Okay so do you want to draw back to a particular point in the conversation? Or are we done here?
I am about to leave for the long weekend, so my responses will be sporadic at best.
I will look back and see if there is anything left unsaid.
Feb 17, 2017 13:37:02 #
BigBear wrote:
I am about to leave for the long weekend, so my responses will be sporadic at best.
I will look back and see if there is anything left unsaid.
I will look back and see if there is anything left unsaid.
Okay I'll un-ignore Kenny and let him play for a while.
Enjoy your weekend.
Feb 17, 2017 13:38:08 #
Wellhiem wrote:
Okay I'll un-ignore Kenny and let him play for a while.
Enjoy your weekend.
Enjoy your weekend.
You as well thank you …
Feb 17, 2017 13:50:00 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Is Idaho one of the five states that have NOT adopted Common Core(CCSS)?
SS
SS
Here in Missouri we dropped common core this last election, and none too soon.
Feb 17, 2017 14:42:24 #
Wellhiem wrote:
Do they teach both sides of the story when it comes to gravity? Do they teach that if you wish hard enough, you may be able to jump off a tall building and not fall? No they don't. Why? Because it's not science, and it has no place in a science class.
Neither do political sound bites.
Neither do political sound bites.
OK. Yet the OP made it just that. This issue indisputably has two sides. You can agree with one or the other but to expose the students to only one side is not doing justice to the argument.
Feb 17, 2017 14:45:05 #
Wellhiem wrote:
http://thinkprogress.org/idaho-climate-science-school-curriculum-fc81d0b6d432#.37xcb0jv1
Nothing new here , ask Dan Rather he knows
Feb 17, 2017 16:47:58 #
Keenan wrote:
Bob, you are completely full of shit when it comes... (show quote)
You are completely full of shit anytime you open your pie hole, KKK. And yet, you excel in making yourself look like a Blithering arrogant idiot. You're welcome.
Feb 17, 2017 23:13:29 #
rfmaude41
Loc: Lancaster, Texas (DFW area)
dljen wrote:
Typical GOP governing, going back in history.
How, it looks like your brain went way back in history, maybe as far as 5000BC, eh ?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.