Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Good zoom lens for low light?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 30, 2013 14:30:56   #
energizerdel
 
I wondered if anyone could suggest a good zoom lens for my Canon 20D (yes, I know it's ancient, but still takes great photos). I'm doing some photography inside in the evening at a friends engagement party next week and I want to hire a zoom lens so that I can get some decent photos without "being in the way". Anyone have any suggestions for a zoom lens that will give me good photos in low light situations?

Reply
Jan 30, 2013 14:32:38   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
This may help http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-93483-1.html

Reply
Jan 30, 2013 15:08:33   #
JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
 
Don't knock the 20D, I know three people who will not change it

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2013 20:39:11   #
Db7423 Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
The 24-70 f2.8 and/or the 70-200 f2.8 are the best of the fast zooms.

Reply
Jan 30, 2013 21:44:52   #
energizerdel
 
Db7423 wrote:
The 24-70 f2.8 and/or the 70-200 f2.8 are the best of the fast zooms.


Thanks I had been looking at the 24-70 f2.8. I appreciate all the answers I've had - thanks so much for answering.

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 00:18:05   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
energizerdel wrote:
Db7423 wrote:
The 24-70 f2.8 and/or the 70-200 f2.8 are the best of the fast zooms.


Thanks I had been looking at the 24-70 f2.8. I appreciate all the answers I've had - thanks so much for answering.


For a full-frame camera the 24-70 would be great.
For the 20D the 24-70 is not very wide.
I strongly recommend the 17-55.
I use the Nikon equivalent with the D7000.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/17-55mm.htm

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 00:44:00   #
Grammieb1 Loc: New Orleans
 
energizerdel wrote:
I wondered if anyone could suggest a good zoom lens for my Canon 20D (yes, I know it's ancient, but still takes great photos). I'm doing some photography inside in the evening at a friends engagement party next week and I want to hire a zoom lens so that I can get some decent photos without "being in the way". Anyone have any suggestions for a zoom lens that will give me good photos in low light situations?


The canon 17-55 f/2.8 is would be perfect for indoor shots with a 20D. It has a fast appature for a zoom, it has a good indoor range for a crop camera & stabilization for low light shots. It is an excellent lens. Bab

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2013 01:38:13   #
energizerdel
 
For a full-frame camera the 24-70 would be great.
For the 20D the 24-70 is not very wide.
I strongly recommend the 17-55.
I use the Nikon equivalent with the D7000.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/17-55mm.htm[/quote]

Thanks for the reply, but isn't the 17-55mm f/2.8 a wide angle lens rather than a zoom? Just wondering?

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 02:42:46   #
Grammieb1 Loc: New Orleans
 
The 17-55 is a standard zoom on the 20D. The 10-22 is the canon wide angle zoom for their cropped line. Bab

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 03:03:49   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Here is my first question....HOW low is low light?

Even a 2.8 lens will have some issues in really low light...that's just a fact...

And second; what's the QUALITY of the existing light? Where is it coming from? Will it be overhead lights and people will have shadows in the wrong places?

There is a LOT more than just the AMOUNT of light to consider.

Is there no way to unobtrusively get some light into the scene? (usually there is but nobody wants to take the small amount of time and effort to do it.)


It could be as simple as putting a flash, with a diffuser up high on a book case pointed towards the corner of the room where everyone will be; it will just put "some extra" light into the already lit scene and won't even be noticed...

I just did it and I was able to shoot at f/4 at 1/200 ISO 640 in my dark cave of a house (which normally I can only squeeze out 1/60, f/2, ISO 1600)...quite a difference and there was much available light...more than enough with just one flash.

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 06:45:59   #
ASR666 Loc: Singapore
 
As some have already said ... 17-55 f2.8 is a good lens.

For group shots pls be aware that at the wide end it distorts towards the edges. So avoid placing people towards the edges and too near to the camera.

energizerdel wrote:
I wondered if anyone could suggest a good zoom lens for my Canon 20D (yes, I know it's ancient, but still takes great photos). I'm doing some photography inside in the evening at a friends engagement party next week and I want to hire a zoom lens so that I can get some decent photos without "being in the way". Anyone have any suggestions for a zoom lens that will give me good photos in low light situations?

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2013 08:04:58   #
Db7423 Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
energizerdel wrote:
Db7423 wrote:
The 24-70 f2.8 and/or the 70-200 f2.8 are the best of the fast zooms.


Thanks I had been looking at the 24-70 f2.8. I appreciate all the answers I've had - thanks so much for answering.


For a full-frame camera the 24-70 would be great.
For the 20D the 24-70 is not very wide.
I strongly recommend the 17-55.
I use the Nikon equivalent with the D7000.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/17-55mm.htm


Goofy, indeed. I don't like to suggest crop lenses. Often people move to full frame and are stuck with an inventory of lenses that are useless and sold at a great loss. As good as the 17-55 is it is limited to crop sensor bodies and has limits of its own. If I was to only have one good lens I would rather it be in the range of 35-105 than 17-55...just sayin. ;)

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 09:16:18   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
The OP said something about "hiring" a zoom lens. I assume that means renting & as such they would not be buying the 17-55

Db7423 wrote:
GoofyNewfie wrote:
energizerdel wrote:
Db7423 wrote:
The 24-70 f2.8 and/or the 70-200 f2.8 are the best of the fast zooms.


Thanks I had been looking at the 24-70 f2.8. I appreciate all the answers I've had - thanks so much for answering.


For a full-frame camera the 24-70 would be great.
For the 20D the 24-70 is not very wide.
I strongly recommend the 17-55.
I use the Nikon equivalent with the D7000.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/17-55mm.htm


Goofy, indeed. I don't like to suggest crop lenses. Often people move to full frame and are stuck with an inventory of lenses that are useless and sold at a great loss. As good as the 17-55 is it is limited to crop sensor bodies and has limits of its own. If I was to only have one good lens I would rather it be in the range of 35-105 than 17-55...just sayin. ;)
quote=GoofyNewfie quote=energizerdel quote=Db74... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 09:33:33   #
Db7423 Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
The OP said something about "hiring" a zoom lens. I assume that means renting & as such they would not be buying the 17-55

Db7423 wrote:
GoofyNewfie wrote:
energizerdel wrote:
Db7423 wrote:
The 24-70 f2.8 and/or the 70-200 f2.8 are the best of the fast zooms.


Thanks I had been looking at the 24-70 f2.8. I appreciate all the answers I've had - thanks so much for answering.


For a full-frame camera the 24-70 would be great.
For the 20D the 24-70 is not very wide.
I strongly recommend the 17-55.
I use the Nikon equivalent with the D7000.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/17-55mm.htm


Goofy, indeed. I don't like to suggest crop lenses. Often people move to full frame and are stuck with an inventory of lenses that are useless and sold at a great loss. As good as the 17-55 is it is limited to crop sensor bodies and has limits of its own. If I was to only have one good lens I would rather it be in the range of 35-105 than 17-55...just sayin. ;)
quote=GoofyNewfie quote=energizerdel quote=Db74... (show quote)
The OP said something about "hiring" a z... (show quote)


Hey Scott, looks like you may have picked up on a word the rest of us, well at least I missed...if you are renting what the heck, try one of everything! :)

Reply
Jan 31, 2013 10:17:04   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Db7423 wrote:


Goofy, indeed. I don't like to suggest crop lenses. Often people move to full frame and are stuck with an inventory of lenses that are useless and sold at a great loss. As good as the 17-55 is it is limited to crop sensor bodies and has limits of its own. If I was to only have one good lens I would rather it be in the range of 35-105 than 17-55...just sayin. ;)


Needs a lens to use on a crop sensor camera NOW, not in the future when/if the move to FF comes....just sayin. :lol:

<<<< woops, just saw others who responded..>>>>

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.