Scientist takes photo of a single atom with a regular digital camera.
Feb 13, 2018 19:01:51 #
He did use extension tubes too. It is remarkable to see an image of a single atom captured with a regular camera.
The article doesn't what say what brand of camera was used.
You can read the article and see the photo at this link.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/a-scientist-captured-an-impossible-photo-of-a-single-atom/ar-BBJ5C2U?li=BBnb7Kz
The article doesn't what say what brand of camera was used.
You can read the article and see the photo at this link.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/a-scientist-captured-an-impossible-photo-of-a-single-atom/ar-BBJ5C2U?li=BBnb7Kz
Feb 13, 2018 19:19:39 #
I knew we could do it. Our scientist are the best in the world. Take that China.
Feb 13, 2018 19:23:10 #
Hal81 wrote:
I knew we could do it. Our scientist are the best in the world. Take that China.
I take it you're from the UK....where the university and the scientist who accomplished this is located.
"A student at the University of Oxford is being celebrated in the world of science photography for capturing a single, floating atom with an ordinary camera.
Using long exposure, PhD candidate David Nadlinger took a photo of a glowing atom in an intricate web of laboratory machinery."
Feb 14, 2018 12:37:51 #
ricardo7
Loc: Washington, DC - Santiago, Chile
If the electrodes are 2 mm apart, that is one gigantic atom.
Atoms are measured in angstroms.
Atoms are measured in angstroms.
Feb 14, 2018 14:06:57 #
Feb 14, 2018 17:27:49 #
ricardo7 wrote:
If the electrodes are 2 mm apart, that is one gigantic atom.
Atoms are measured in angstroms.
Atoms are measured in angstroms.
Feb 14, 2018 23:52:10 #
Feb 15, 2018 08:57:30 #
Hal81 wrote:
I knew we could do it. Our scientist are the best in the world. Take that China.
Do not be too sure of that anymore. You ought to worry about the current brain drain. Your grammar is certainly not exactly world-class either.
Feb 16, 2018 17:20:02 #
Only one atom? He has a way to go. My photos usually depict trillions of atoms.... :-)
Feb 19, 2018 15:10:40 #
Soul Dr. wrote:
He did use extension tubes too. It is remarkable to see an image of a single atom captured with a regular camera.
The article doesn't what say what brand of camera was used.
You can read the article and see the photo at this link.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/a-scientist-captured-an-impossible-photo-of-a-single-atom/ar-BBJ5C2U?li=BBnb7Kz
The article doesn't what say what brand of camera was used.
You can read the article and see the photo at this link.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/a-scientist-captured-an-impossible-photo-of-a-single-atom/ar-BBJ5C2U?li=BBnb7Kz
Don’t be too accepting of the claim. What was visualized was a regional photo-emittive effect of a stimulated single atom. Surely a remarlable achievement, but NOT, in any way, visualization of the atom itself.
Dave
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.