Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Worst Digital Photography Suggestion/Tip?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
Feb 13, 2018 10:05:58   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Correction: Never said or believed "never need a tripod." I have used a tripod to do photography, with good results. Nevertheless, fewer conditions now require a tripod.

This device, however, a photographer should own for use when he faces conditions calling for it.

Progress here represents the advance of technology to bring us image stabilization to reduce reliance on a a tripod.
leftj wrote:
Well, at least he's moved from "never need a tripod" to "sometimes you need a tripod". We're making progress.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:10:47   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
anotherview wrote:
Correction: Never said or believed "never need a tripod." I have used a tripod to do photography, with good results. Nevertheless, fewer conditions now require a tripod.

This device, however, a photographer should own for use when he faces conditions calling for it.

Progress here represents the advance of technology to bring us image stabilization to reduce reliance on a a tripod.


Beg to differ. Your first post said don't buy a tripod. It's not needed because of image stabilization.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:16:53   #
Bison Bud
 
I think the worst advice that I frequently hear on this forum is telling someone that they should only shoot in manual mode and implying that a good photographer would only use manual mode virtually all the time! Yes, when one needs or wants full control, it's the only suitable option, but implying that it's the only way to get a high quality or creative photo is just plain misguided. Frankly, there's a time and use for most all the available shooting modes and a truly good photographer should know how to use them and when they might be a good, if not better choice, as well. Frankly, not every shot is an "artistic endeavor" either, but one can indeed have "vision and purpose" in Auto Mode just as easily as in Manual, they just don't have as much control over what the camera produces and it's just a tool. In this age of extensive post production, it doesn't seem to matter all that much anyway.

I started out years ago using a Pentax K-1000, which is strictly manual operation (including focus) and I still shoot in manual frequently with my DLSR, however, I've really learned to appreciate the "semi-auto" and even "Program" modes now available and if you really think about it, we all spend a lot of money to get new features and capabilities all the time. I have to wonder how many of these "Full Time Manual Mode" photographers are focusing manually too? Anyway, I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of anyone making or marketing a strictly manual DLSR these days and I think there's good reason for it. Yes, we should encourage Newbies to learn to shoot in manual, frankly we should encourage them to learn all the features and options available on their cameras, but maybe some of us need to step down off their high horses a bit when it comes to shooting in manual.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2018 10:22:37   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Bison Bud wrote:
I think the worst advice that I frequently hear on this forum is telling someone that they should only shoot in manual mode and implying that a good photographer would only use manual mode virtually all the time! Yes, when one needs or wants full control, it's the only suitable option, but implying that it's the only way to get a high quality or creative photo is just plain misguided. Frankly, there's a time and use for most all the available shooting modes and a truly good photographer should know how to use them and when they might be a good, if not better choice, as well. Frankly, not every shot is an "artistic endeavor" either, but one can indeed have "vision and purpose" in Auto Mode just as easily as in Manual, they just don't have as much control over what the camera produces and it's just a tool. In this age of extensive post production, it doesn't seem to matter all that much anyway.

I started out years ago using a Pentax K-1000, which is strictly manual operation (including focus) and I still shoot in manual frequently with my DLSR, however, I've really learned to appreciate the "semi-auto" and even "Program" modes now available and if you really think about it, we all spend a lot of money to get new features and capabilities all the time. I have to wonder how many of these "Full Time Manual Mode" photographers are focusing manually too? Anyway, I may be wrong, but I'm not aware of anyone making or marketing a strictly manual DLSR these days and I think there's good reason for it. Yes, we should encourage Newbies to learn to shoot in manual, frankly we should encourage them to learn all the features and options available on their cameras, but maybe some of us need to step down off their high horses a bit when it comes to shooting in manual.
I think the worst advice that I frequently hear on... (show quote)


Well said.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:26:28   #
Jim Bob
 
Gene51 wrote:
I use that all the time - and I shoot lots of birds in flight. Never noticed an issue. But they gave you incomplete advice - you still have to remain conscious of your shutter speed and ISO.


Yep.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:29:51   #
Rick from NY Loc: Sarasota FL
 
burkphoto wrote:
So? Photography is photography. Digital is not a subset, and neither is film.


No kidding, but the question specifically asked about worst digital advice, not worst photography advice. Many replies are simply off subject.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:33:53   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Actually, Av mode is a good mode for shooting birds. You guys don't know what your talking about. All you have to do is shoot wide open, (with most lenses) and adjust the ISO so that you maintain a shutter speed of at least 1/1000th of a second shutter. Usually ISO 400 is fine. Sometimes when low light conditions are present you must push the ISO a little higher. But on a bright sunny day Av, ISO 100 and wide open are the settings prefered. Once in a while when shooting up into a tree where a bird is deep in the branches and it's in shade, I'll push the ISO higher and I'll usually use +1 stop EC. Birds in the bright sky, I put the EC to +2/3 of a stop otherwise the dark blue sky looks too fake.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2018 10:34:25   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Rick from NY wrote:
No kidding, but the question specifically asked about worst digital advice, not worst photography advice. Many replies are simply off subject.


So, you're what? The room monitor?

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:34:40   #
Jim Bob
 
Feiertag wrote:
Mine was to shoot in Aperture Priority Mode. When I started taking photos of birds and becoming familiar with my Canon T3i, I was advised by the seasoned photographers, to do so.

As I look at my older shots, many very ruined by blur.

What was the worst suggest that you have been given?


Geesus. I've received so much bad information (much of it from this site) that I wouldn't know where to start. Sorry.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:36:23   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Geesus. I've received so much bad information (much of it from this site) that I wouldn't know where to start. Sorry.


Bad information comes from all sources. Life isn't fair.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:39:08   #
Jim Bob
 
leftj wrote:
Bad information comes from all sources. Life isn't fair.

Who claimed it was? Certainly not me. Thanks for that refreshing insight.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2018 10:44:08   #
Hyperhad Loc: Thunder Bay, Canada
 
Don't bother learning about photography. Just use your phone.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:45:43   #
Jim Bob
 
Hyperhad wrote:
Don't bother learning about photography. Just use your phone.


Did you receive that tip from UHH?

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:47:28   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Who claimed it was? Certainly not me. Thanks for that refreshing insight.


You seemed to intimate that most bad information comes from UHH. Thus my comment.

Reply
Feb 13, 2018 10:48:41   #
Feiertag Loc: British Columbia, Canada
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
Actually, Av mode is a good mode for shooting birds. You guys don't know what your talking about. All you have to do is shoot wide open, (with most lenses) and adjust the ISO so that you maintain a shutter speed of at least 1/1000th of a second shutter. Usually ISO 400 is fine. Sometimes when low light conditions are present you must push the ISO a little higher. But on a bright sunny day Av, ISO 100 and wide open are the settings prefered. Once in a while when shooting up into a tree where a bird is deep in the branches and it's in shade, I'll push the ISO higher and I'll usually use +1 stop EC. Birds in the bright sky, I put the EC to +2/3 of a stop otherwise the dark blue sky looks too fake.
Actually, Av mode is a good mode for shooting bird... (show quote)

Au contraire! I don't know what I'm talking about? What if wide open is f/5.6 or higher with some zoom lenses and you are in low light situation? Now you have to hope your shutter speed stays around the 1/000th when the bird takes flight, which btw is too low of a setting in this case. You don't have that control with Av mode like you do in M or second best, S mode.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.